Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T00:07:39.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Puzzling Case of Christianity and Republicanism: A Comment on Black

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Cary J. Nederman
Cary J. Nederman*
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Antony Black argues that Christian republicanism was one of the discourses at work in framing the history of Western republican thought. But he neglects to confront the theoretically unique character of the Christian approach to republican institutions. First, Christian republicanism derived from more general beliefs about the divinely ordained organic structure of the universe. Second, it evinced no necessary hostility toward monarchic rule; indeed, quite to the contrary, its cosmological premise of organic hierarchy supported the office of the king (whether papal or secular). Once these elements of Christian republicanism are supplied, the medieval contribution to the history of republican ideas takes on a complexion very different from that described by Black.

Type
Forum
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 92 , Issue 4 , December 1998 , pp. 913 - 918
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Black, Antony. 1988. “The Conciliar Movement.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought, ed. Burns, J. H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 573–87.Google Scholar
Black, Antony. 1992. Political Thought in Europe 1250–1450. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Antony. 1997. “Christianity and Republicanism: From St. Cyprian to Rousseau.” American Political Science Review 91(September):647–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Janet. 1997. “Structural Realities of Power: The Theory and Practice of Monarchies and Republics in Relation to Personal and Collective Liberty.” In The Propagation of Power in the Medieval West, ed. Gosman, Martin, Vanderjagt, A. J., and Veenstra, Jan. Groningen: Egbert Forsten. Pp. 207–30.Google Scholar
Constable, Giles. 1995. Three Studies in Medieval Religious and Social Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasolt, Constantin. 1991. Council and Hierarchy: The Political Thought of William Durant the Younger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerson, Jean. [1415a] 1962. De Auferibilitate Sponsi. In Oeuvres Complètes, vol. 3, ed. Glorieux, Palemon. Paris: Desclée. Pp. 294–313.Google Scholar
Gerson, Jean. [1415b] 1963. In Recessu Regis Romanorum. In Oeuvres Complètes, vol. 5, ed. Glorieux, Palemon. Paris: Desclée. Pp. 417–80.Google Scholar
Gerson, Jean. [1417] 1965a. De Potestate Ecclesiastica. In Oeuvres Complètes, vol. 6, ed. Glorieux, Palemon. Paris: Desclée. Pp. 210–50.Google Scholar
Gerson, Jean. [1409a] 1965b. Propositio Facit Coram Angelicis. In Oeuvres Complètes, vol. 6, ed. Glorieux, Palemon. Paris: Desclée. Pp. 130–5.Google Scholar
Gerson, Jean. [1409b] 1965c. Tractatus de Unitate Ecclesiae. In Oeuvres Complètes, vol. 6, ed. Glorieux, Palemon. Paris: Desclée. Pp. 136–45.Google Scholar
John of Salisbury. [1159] 1955. The Letters of John of Salisbury, Volume One, The Early Years (1153–1161), ed. Millor, W. J., Butler, H. E., and Brooke, C. N. L.. Edinburgh: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst H. 1957. The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Morrall, John B. 1960. Gerson and the Great Schism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Nederman, Cary J. 1992. “Freedom, Community and Function: Communitarian Lessons of Medieval Political Theory.” American Political Science Review 86(December):977–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas of Cusa. 1959–1968. De Concordantia Catholica, 3 vols., ed. Kallen, Gerhard. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Nicholas of Cusa. 1991. The Catholic Concordance, trans. Sigmund, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oakley, Francis. 1969. “Figgis, Constance, and the Divines of Paris.” American Historical Review 75(December):368–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascoe, Louis B. 1973. Jean Gerson: Principles of Church Reform. Leiden: E. J. Brill.10.1163/9789004477179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, John. 1975. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rahe, Paul. 1992. Republics Ancient and Modern: Classical Republicanism and the American Revolution. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1987. The Basic Political Writings, ed. Cress, D. A.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1978. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Struve, Tilman. 1978. Die Entwicklung der Organologischen Staatsauffasung im Mittelalter. Stuttgart: Hiersemann.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. 1955. Foundations of the Conciliar Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. 1982. Religion, Law, and the Growth of Constitutional Thought, 1150–1650. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.