No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Punishing Liberals or Rehabilitating Liberalism?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 December 1989
Abstract
In the September 1988 issue of this Review, Stanley C. Brubaker argued that liberals strive for neutrality concerning how people should live and that this moral ambivalence prevented them from punishing. In this Controversy, Ronald Terchek denies that liberalism is crippled by moral relativism or incapacitated for punishment. In return, Brubaker defends his firm no to the question, Can liberals punish?
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 1989
References
Brubaker, Stanley C.
1988. “Can Liberals Punish?” American Political Science Review
82:821–36.10.2307/1962493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, James. 1983. John Locke's Moral Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, John. 1969. The Political Thought of John Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511558436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1984. The Division of Labour in Society. Trans. Halls, W. D.. London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-17729-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Ruth W.
1987. John Locke's Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226306919.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Peter. 1830. The Life of John Locke with Extracts from His Correspondence, Journals, and Common-place Books. 2 vols. London: Colburn & Bentley.Google Scholar
Kraynak, Robert P.
1980. “John Locke: From Absolutism to Toleration.” American Political Science Review
74:53–69.10.2307/1955646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1952. The Second Treatise of Government. Ed. Peardon, Thomas. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1958. The Reasonableness of Christianity. Ed. Ramsey, Ian T.. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1968. The Educational Writings of John Locke. Ed. Axtell, James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1979. Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Mill, John S.
1868. Speech to the House of Commons, Hansard Parliamentary Debates, 3d ser., vol. 191.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1959. On Liberty. Ed. Sheilds, Currin V.. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Mill, John S.
1984. Essays on Equality, Law, and Education. Vol. 4 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, ed. Robson, John. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Pangle, Thomas L.
1988. The Spirit of Modern Republicanism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin. 1964. The Politics of Conscience: T. H. Green and His Age. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 1986. The Evolution of Rights in Liberal Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Semmel, Bernard. 1984. John Stuart Mill and the Pursuit of Virtue. New Haven: Yale University Press.10.2307/j.ctt1xp3s9wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1976. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Ed. Raphael, David D. and MacFie, Alec L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tarcov, Nathan. 1984. Locke's Education for Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tully, James. 1980. A Discourse on Property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511558641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winch, Donald. 1978. Adam Smith's Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yolton, John. 1970. Locke and the Compass of Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Michael P.
1986. “John Locke and the Problem of Civil Religion.” The Moral Foundations of the American Republic. 3d ed., ed. Horwitz, Robert H.. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.