Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:33:01.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public Reason Confucianism: A Construction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2015

SUNGMOON KIM
SUNGMOON KIM*
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong
*
Sungmoon Kim is Associate Professor, City University of Hong Kong ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

If perfectionism is understood as the state's non-neutral promotion of a valuable way of life, Confucian political theory, often pursued as a pluralist correction to global monism of liberal democracy, is ineluctably perfectionist. But how can Confucian perfectionism, committed to particular Confucian values, reconcile with the societal fact of value pluralism within the putative Confucian polity? This article argues that a potential tension between Confucian perfectionism and value pluralism can be avoided by making Confucian perfectionist goods the core elements of public reason with which citizens can justify their arguments to one another and by which the state can justifiably exercise its public authority to reasonable citizens who otherwise subscribe to various comprehensive doctrines. By defining a mode of Confucian perfectionism working through Confucian public reason broadly shared by citizens as public reason Confucianism, this article attempts to balance the Confucian polity's internal societal pluralism and the people's collective self-determination.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 109 , Issue 1 , February 2015 , pp. 187 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abizadeh, Arash. 2008. “Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders.” Political Theory 36 (1): 37–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angle, Stephen C. 2005. “Decent Democratic Centralism.” Political Theory 33 (4): 518–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angle, Stephen C. 2012. Contemporary Confucian Political Philosophy: Toward Progressive Confucianism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Bae, Mun-jo, and Park, Se-jeong. 2013. “Taehaksengŭi hyoedaehan inshikkwaa kachokgach’igwane yŏnghyang’ŭl mich’inŭn pyŏnin” [Consciousness of Filial Piety and Family Values among College Students], Journal of the Korean Contents Association 13: 275–85.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin R. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1995. “John Rawls and the Search for Stability.” Ethics 105 (4): 874–915.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel A. 2006. Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel A. 2008. China's New Confucianism: Politics and Everyday Life in a Changing Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Caney, Simon. 1995. “Anti-Perfectionism and Rawlsian Liberalism,” Political Studies 43 (2): 248–64.Google Scholar
Carens, Joseph H. 1995. “Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders.” In Theorizing Citizenship. Ed. Beiner, Ronald. Albany: State University of New York Press, 229–53.Google Scholar
Chan, Joseph. 2000. “Legitimacy, Unanimity, and Perfectionism,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (1): 5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Joseph. 2012. “On Legitimacy of Confucian Constitutionalism.” In Jiang Qing, A Confucian Constitutional Order. Eds. Bell, Daniel A. and Fan, Ruiping and trans. Edmund Ryden. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Joseph. 2014. Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy for Modern Times. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. 2008. The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 1993. “Freedom of Expression.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 22: 207–63.Google Scholar
Deuchler, Martina. 1992. The Confucian Transformation of Korea: A Study of Society and Ideology. Cambridge, MA: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry, and Plattner, Marc F. (Eds.) 2001. The Global Divergence of Democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fan, Ruiping. 2010. Reconstructionist Confucianism: Rethinking Morality after the West. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Joel S., and Soper, J. Christopher. 2013. Confucianism, Democratization, and Human Rights in Taiwan. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Galston, William A. 2002. Liberal Pluralism: The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Galston, William A. 2005. The Practice of Liberal Pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1996. Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and Its Rivals. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement: Why Moral Conflict Cannot Be Avoided in Politics, and What Should Be Done about It. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Hahm, Chaibong. 1997. “The Confucian Political Discourse and the Politics of Reform in Korea.” Korea Journal 34 (4): 65–77.Google Scholar
Hahm, Chaibong. 2004. “The Ironies of Confucianism.” Journal of Democracy 15: 93–107.Google Scholar
Han, Sangjin, and Eun, Kisu. 1999. “Kaehyŏkchiyangjŏk chungsanch’ŭngŭi kach’igwanchiyang’gwa ch’amyŏjŏk shillyoesahoe kuch’uk” [The Value Orientation of the Progressive-Minded Middle Class and the Construction of a Participatory Fiduciary Society]. The Ministry of Education Research Report, South Korea.Google Scholar
Helgesen, Geir. 1998. Democracy and Authority in Korea: The Cultural Dimension in Korean Politics. Surrey: Curzon.Google Scholar
Inkeles, Alex. 1969. “Making Men Modern: On the Causes and Consequences of Individual Change in Six Developing Countries.” American Journal of Sociology 75 (2): 208–25.Google Scholar
Jiang, Qing. 2012. A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China's Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future. Eds. Bell, Daniel A. and Fan, Ruiping and trans. Edmund Ryden. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kateb, George. 1998. “The Value of Association.” In Freedom of Association. Ed. Gutmann, Amy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 35–63.Google Scholar
Kim, Hee-Kang. 2007. “Locating Feminism beyond Gender and Culture: A Case of the Family-Head System in South Korea.” Tamnon 201 10 (1): 245–90.Google Scholar
Kim, Sungmoon. 2014. Confucian Democracy in East Asia: Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koh, Byung-ik. 1996. “Confucianism in Contemporary Korea.” In Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity: Moral Education and Economic Culture in Japan and Four Mini-Dragons. Ed. Wei-ming, Tu. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 191–201.Google Scholar
Korean Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism. 2011. “Religions in Korea” [Han’gukui jonggyo hyeonhwang]. Publication Number: 11-1371000-000391-01.Google Scholar
Krause, Sharon. 2008. Civil Passions: Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 2001. Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles. 2003. “Public Reason.” In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 368–93.Google Scholar
Lee, Namhee. 2007. The Making of Minjung: Democracy and the Politics of Representation in South Korea. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil. 1991. “Is Nationalism Philosophically Credible?” In Issues of Self-Determination. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 8–19.Google Scholar
Macedo, Stephen. 2000. Diversity and Distrust: Civic Education in a Multicultural Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mang, Franz F. L. 2013. “Liberal Neutrality and Moderate Perfectionism,” Res Publica 19 (4): 297–315.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank L. 2003. “Rawls on Constitutionalism and Constitutional Law.” In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Ed. Freeman, Samuel, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 394–425.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 1995. On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 2010. “Why Immigration Controls Are Not Coercive: A Reply to Arash Abizadeh.” Political Theory 38 (1): 111–20.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 1993. The Return of the Political. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Na, Chong-sŏk. 2014. “Han’guk minjujuŭiwa yugyomunhaw” [Korean Democracy and Confucian Culture]. In Yuhagi onŭlŭi munchee tabŭl jul su innŭnga [Can Confucianism Give an Answer for Today's Problems]. Eds. Na, Chong-sŏk, Park, Yŏng-to, and Cho, Kyŏng-ran. Seoul: Hyean, 242–70.Google Scholar
Quong, Jonathan. 2011. Liberalism without Perfection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” In The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 129–80.Google Scholar
Ridge, Michael. 1998. “Hobbesian Public Reason.” Ethics 108 (3): 538–68.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Nancy L. 1996. “The Democracy of Everyday Life.” In Liberalism without Illusions: Essays on Liberal Theory and the Political Vision of Judith N. Shklar. Ed. Bernard Yack. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 25–44.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Nancy L. 1998. Membership and Morals: The Personal Uses of Pluralism in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ryu, Su-young. 2007. “Han’gukinui yugyojeok gachicheukjeongnunhang gaebal yeon’gu [Item Development for Korean Confucian Values].” Korean Journal of Management 15: 171–205.Google Scholar
Sher, George. 1997. Beyond Neutrality: Perfectionism and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, Doh Chull. 2012. Confucianism and Democratization in East Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stout, Jeffrey. 2004. Democracy and Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tamir, Yael. 1993. Liberal Nationalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tiwald, Justin. 2008. “A Right of Rebellion in the Mengzi?” Dao 7 (3): 269–82.Google Scholar
Tu, Wei-ming. 1991. “The Search for Roots in Industrial East Asia: The Case of the Confucian Revival.” In Fundamentalisms Observed. Eds. Marty, Martin E. and Appleby, R. Scott. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1999. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wall, Steven. 1998. Liberalism, Perfectionism and Restraint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wenman, Mark. 2013. Agonistic Democracy: Constituent Power in the Era of Globalisation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 2012. Understanding Liberal Democracy: Essays in Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Hyunah. 2006. “Vision of Postcolonial Feminist Jurisprudence in Korea: Seen from the ‘Family-Head System’ in Family Law.” Journal of Korean Law 5 (2): 12–28.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.