Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:21:02.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Promise and Performance: A Dynamic Model of Presidential Popularity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1985

Charles W. Ostrom Jr.  and
Dennis M. Simon
Charles W. Ostrom Jr.
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Dennis M. Simon
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The growth of public opinion measurement in the last 40 years has added a new dimension to the study of presidential behavior. Not only have public evaluations become more newsworthy, but the importance of public support as a resource and determinant of political survival has been enhanced. Recent scholarship on the presidency has documented the value of public support, attempted to identify its major determinants, and speculated about the manner in which presidents might influence these evaluations.

This research is designed to integrate these concerns into a single model and thereby to examine the interdependence between public support as a product of citizen decisions and as a political resource. First, a characterization of the citizen as an evaluator of the president is developed and used to construct an equation of presidential approval. Next, we develop an equation that explains presidential effectiveness in the legislative arena and illustrates the operation of public support as a presidential resource. The public support and legislative effectiveness equations are specified as a simultaneous equation system, estimated, and evaluated. The results of the model are then used to expand the conventional wisdom about the determinants of public support, to examine the consequences of the reciprocal relationship between public support and legislative success, and to generate ex post forecasts of President Reagan's support from 1981 through 1983.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 79 , Issue 2 , June 1985 , pp. 334 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, P. Political attitudes in America. San Francisco: Freeman, 1983.Google Scholar
Abramson, P., Aldrich, J., & Rohde, D. Continuity and change in the 1980 elections. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Amemiya, T. The non-linear two-stage least squares estimator. Journal of Econometrics, 1974, 2, 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azar, E. Conflict and peace data bank (COPDAB), 1948-1978: Daily aggregation. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, ICPSR 7767, 1982.Google Scholar
Azar, E., & Havener, T. Discontinuities in the symbolic environment: A problem in scaling events. International Interactions, 1976, 2, 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, R. That special moment: The public response to international crises. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Seattle, Washington, 1983.Google Scholar
Brody, R., & Page, B. I. The impact of events on presidential popularity. In Wildavsky, A. (Ed.). Perspectives on the presidency. Boston: Little, Brown, 1975.Google Scholar
Cronin, T. The state of the presidency (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown, 1980.Google Scholar
Davis, O., Hinich, M., & Ordeshook, P. An expository development of a mathematical model of the electoral process. American Political Science Review, 1970, 64, 426–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishel, J. From campaign promise to presidential performance. Presented at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, D.C., June 20, 1979.Google Scholar
George, A., & Keohane, F. The concept of national interest. In George, A. (Ed.). Presidential decisionmaking in foreign policy. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1980, pp. 217–238.Google Scholar
Greenstein, F. The hidden hand presidency. New York: Basic Books, 1982.Google Scholar
Haight, T., & Brody, R. The mass media and presidential popularity. Communications Research, 1977, January, 41–60.Google Scholar
Hibbs, D. A. Jr. On the demands for economic outcomes: Macroeconomic performance and mass political support in the United States. Journal of Politics, 1982, 34, 426–462. (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbs, D. A. Jr. The dynamics of political support for American presidents among occupational and partisan groups. American Journal of Political Science, 1982, 26, 312–332. (b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbs, D. A. Jr. President Reagan's mandate from the 1980 elections. American Politics Quarterly, 1982, 10, 387–420. (c)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbs, D. A. Jr., & Fassbender, H. (Eds.). Contemporary political economy. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1981.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. All things to all men. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1980.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. Subjective political efficacy as a measure of diffuse support. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1980, 44, 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenski, H. The impact of economic conditions on presidential popularity. Journal of Politics, 1977, 39, 764–773. (b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenski, H. Inflation and presidential popularity. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1977, 41, 86–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernell, S. Explaining presidential popularity. American Political Science Review, 1978, 72, 506–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernell, S. Presidential popularity and negative voting. American Political Science Review, 1977, 71, 44–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, L. A textbook of econometrics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974.Google Scholar
Kmenta, J. Elements of econometrics. New York: Macmillan, 1971.Google Scholar
Lee, J. Rallying around the flag. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 1977, 7, 252–256.Google Scholar
Light, P. The president's agenda. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M., & Schneider, W. The confidence gap. New York: Free Press, 1983.Google Scholar
MacKuen, M. Political drama, economic conditions, and the dynamics of presidential popularity. American Journal of Political Science, 1983, 27, 165–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCleary, R., & Hay, R. Jr. Applied time series analysis. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1980.Google Scholar
Monroe, K. Presidential popularity: An Almon distributed lag model. Political Methodology, 1981, 7, 43–70.Google Scholar
Mueller, J. Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson. American Political Science Review, 1970, 64, 18–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J. War, presidents, and public opinion. New York: Wiley, 1973.Google Scholar
Neustadt, R. Presidential power. New York: Wiley, 1980.Google Scholar
Norpoth, H., & Yantek, T. Macroeconomic conditions and fluctuations of presidential popularity. American Journal of Political Science, 1983, 27, 785–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, C., & Job, B. The president and the political use of force. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Denver, Colorado, 1982.Google Scholar
Ostrom, C., & Simon, D. Managing popular support. Policy Studies Journal, 1984, 12, 677–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pindyck, R., & Rubinfeld, D. Econometric models and economic forecasts. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1981.Google Scholar
Riker, W., & Ordeshook, P. An introduction to positive political theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1973.Google Scholar
Rivers, D., & Rose, R. Passing the president's program. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1981.Google Scholar
Rohde, D., & Simon, D. Presidential vetoes and the congressional response. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois, 1983.Google Scholar
Searing, D., Wright, S., & Rabinowitz, G. The primacy principle: Attitude change and political socialization. British Journal of Politics, 1976, 6, 83–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, J. Public support for American presidents. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1976, 40, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, E. Determinants of outcomes of midterm congressional elections. American Political Science Review, 1975, 69, 812–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildavsky, A. The two presidencies. Trans-Action, 166(4), 7–14.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.