Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:17:18.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Presidency and Organized Interests: White House Patterns of Interest Group Liaison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Mark A. Peterson
Mark A. Peterson
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies of the relationship between the presidency and organized interests generally focus on presidential assistants and their communications with the interest group community. I take a different perspective. Based on presidential strategic interests and choices illuminated for several administrations through interviews with White House officials, four kinds of interest group liaison are identified: governing party, consensus building, outreach, and legitimization. These approaches are then empirically evaluated for the Reagan White House using interviews with Reagan's staff and the responses of several hundred interest group leaders to 1980 and 1985 surveys of national voluntary associations. Like the Carter administration after its first year, the Reagan White House initially emphasized “liaison as governing party” built on exclusive and programmatic ties to groups. A less activist legislative agenda and new circumstances later shifted the emphasis of the Reagan and Bush administrations to other forms of interest group liaison.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 86 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 612 - 625
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benda, Peter M., and Levine, Charles H.. 1988. “Reagan and the Bureaucracy: The Bequest, the Promise, and the Legacy.” In The Reagan Legacy, ed. Jones, Charles O.. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Berman, Larry. 1979. The Office of Management and Budget and the Presidency, 1921–1979. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey M. 1984. The Interest Group Society. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Bond, Jon, and Fleisher, Richard. 1990. The President in the Legislative Arena. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Copeland, Robert M. 1985. “Cultivating Interest Group Support: Public Liaison in the Ford Administration.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Duffy, Michael. 1989. “Mr. Consensus.” Time, 21 August.Google Scholar
Edwards, George C. III. 1989. At the Margins: Presidential Leadership of Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gais, Thomas L., Peterson, Mark A., and Walker, Jack L.. 1984. “Interest Groups, Iron Triangles, and Representative Institutions in American National Government.” British Journal of Political Science 14:161–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gais, Thomas L., and Walker, Jack L.. 1991. “Pathways to Influence in American Politics.” In Mobilizing Interest Groups in America, Walker, Jack L.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Greenwald, Carol S. 1977. Group Power: Lobbying and Public Policy. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh. 1975. “OMB and the Presidency—the Problem of ‘Neutral Competence”.” Public Interest 38:80–98.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh. 1981. “The Changing Presidential Office.” In Politics and the Oval Office, ed. Meltsner, Arnold J.. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles O. 1988. The Trusteeship Presidency: Jimmy Carter and the United States Congress. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Kearns, Doris. 1976. Lyndon Johnson and the American Dream. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Kessel, John H. 1983. “The Structures of the Carter White House.” American Journal of Political Science 27:431–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessel, John H. 1984. “The Structures of the Reagan White House.” American Journal of Political Science 28:231–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilberg, Bobbie. 1991. White House briefing for the American Political Science Association Congressional Fellowship Program. 22 May.Google Scholar
Kumar, Martha Joynt, and Grossman, Michael Baruch. 1984. “The Presidency and Interest Groups.” In The Presidency and the Political System, ed. Nelson, Michael. Washington: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Kumar, Martha Joynt, and Grossman, Michael Baruch. 1986. “Political Communications from the White House: The Interest Group Connection.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 16:92–101.Google Scholar
Mezey, Michael L. 1989. Congress, the President, and Public Policy. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry. 1985. “The Politicized Presidency.” In The New Direction in American Politics, ed. Chubb, John E. and Peterson, Paul E.. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Peterson, Mark A. 1990. Legislating Together: The White House and Capital Hill from Eisenhower to Reagan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Mark A. 1992. “Interest Mobilization and the Presidency.” In The Politics of Interests: Interest Groups Transformed, ed. Petracca, Marc P.. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Peterson, Mark A., and Walker, Jack L.. 1986. “Interest Group Responses to Partisan Change: The Impact of the Reagan Administration upon the National Interest Group System.” In Interest Group Politics, ed. Cigler, Allan J. and Loomis, Burdett A.. Washington: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Pika, Joseph A. 1982. “Dealing with the People Divided: The White House Office of Public Liaison.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Milwaukee.Google Scholar
Pika, Joseph A. 1983. “Interest Groups and the Executive: Presidential Intervention.” In Interest Group Politics, ed. Cigler, Alan J. and Loomis, Burdett A.. Washington: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Pika, Joseph A. 1985. “Interest Groups and the White House: Comparing Administrations.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. 1978. “Interest Groups and the Presidency: Trends in Political Intermediation in American.” In American Politics and Public Policy, ed. Burnham, Walter Dean and Weinberg, Martha Wagner. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. 1983. The Consequences of Party Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Redford, Emmette S., and McCulley, Richard T.. 1986. White House Operations: The Johnson Presidency. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Reischauer, Robert D. 1986. “Fiscal Federalism in the 1980's: Dismantling or Rationalizing the Great Society.” In The Great Society and Its Legacy, ed. Kaplan, Marshall and Cuciti, Peggy. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Rockman, Bert A. 1984. The Leadership Question: The Presidency and the American System, New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Tierney, John T.. 1986. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Simonton, Dean Keith. 1987. Why Presidents Succeed: A Political Psychology of Leadership. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, Robert J. 1983. The Presidency and Public Policy: The Four Arenas of Presidential Power. University: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Stockman, David A. 1986. The Triumph of Politics: Why the Reagan Revolution Failed. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1983. “The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups in America.” American Political Science Review 77:390–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1991. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolman, Harold, and Teitelbaum, Fred. 1984. “Interest Groups and the Reagan Presidency.” In The Reagan Presidency and the Governing of America, ed. Salamon, Lester M. and Lund, Michael S.. Washington: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.