Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T03:48:08.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pragmatism and Prophecy: H. G. Wells and the Metaphysics of Socialism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2017

DUNCAN BELL
DUNCAN BELL*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
*
Duncan Bell is a Reader in Political Thought and International Relations, Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3BU ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Read throughout the world, H. G. Wells was one of the most famous political thinkers of the early twentieth century. During the first half of the 1900s, he elaborated a bold and idiosyncratic cosmopolitan socialist vision. In this article, I offer a new reading of Wells's political thought. I argue that he developed a distinctive pragmatist philosophical orientation, which he synthesized with his commitments to Darwinian evolutionary theory. His pragmatism had four main components: a nominalist metaphysics; a verificationist theory of truth; a Jamesian “will to believe”; and a conception of philosophy as an intellectual exercise dedicated to improving practice. His political thought was shaped by this philosophical orientation. Wells, I contend, was the most high-profile pragmatist political thinker of the opening decades of the twentieth century. Acknowledging this necessitates a re-evaluation of both Wells and the history of pragmatism.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 112 , Issue 2 , May 2018 , pp. 409 - 422
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I'd like to thank the following for their valuable comments on the paper: Michael Bacon, Ori Beck, Sarah Cole, Hannah Dawson, Sarah Fine, Michael Frazer, Joel Isaac, Simon James, Alex Livingston, Patrick Parrinder, and Quentin Skinner, as well as the APSR referees and Editor. The paper benefited from presentations at the University of East Anglia and the Institute for Historical Research. Invaluable financial support was provided by the Leverhulme Trust. All the usual disclaimers apply.

References

REFERENCES

Bell, Duncan. 2014. “What is Liberalism?” Political Theory 42 (6): 682–715.Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan. 2016. Reordering the World: Essays on Liberalism and Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan. Forthcoming. “Pragmatic Utopianism and Race: H. G. Wells as Social Scientist.” Modern Intellectual History.Google Scholar
Brooks, Van Wyck. 1915. The World of H. G. Wells. New York: Haskell.Google Scholar
Burgess, Robert, and Park, Ernest. 1921. Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Claeys, Gregory. 2000. “The ‘Survival of the Fittest’ and the Origins of Social Darwinism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 6 (2): 223–40.Google Scholar
Cole, Sarah. Forthcoming. The Wells Era.Google Scholar
Craufurd, A. H. 1909. The Religion of H.G. Wells. London: Unwin.Google Scholar
Desmond, Adrian. 1997. Huxley: Evolution's High Priest, 2 vols. London: Michael Joseph.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1998. “The Development of American Pragmatism” (1925). In The Essential Dewey, Vol. 1, eds. Hickman, Larry & Alexander, Thomas, 1–13.Google Scholar
Earle, Edward Mead. 1950. “H. G. Wells, British Patriot in Search of a World State.” World Politics 2 (2): 181–208.Google Scholar
Edel, Leon and Ray, Gordon, eds. 1958. Henry James and H.G. Wells. London: Hart-Davis.Google Scholar
Ellwood, Charles. 1909. “Review of Wells.” First and Last Things, American Journal of Sociology 14 (4): 550–1.Google Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew. 1997. Pragmatism and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael. 1996. Ideologies and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Piers. 2014. Political Descent: Malthus, Mutualism, and the Politics of Evolution in Victorian England. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Hardy, Sylvia. 1991. “H.G. Wells and Language” (PhD dissertation, University of Leicester).Google Scholar
Hardy, Sylvia. 2008. “H.G. Wells and William James: A Pragmatic Approach.” In H.G. Wells: Interdisciplinary Essays, ed. McLean, Steven. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Michael. 1997. Social Darwinism in European and American Thought, 1860–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, T. H. 1879. Hume. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. 1888. “The Struggle for Existence in Human Society: A Programme.” Nineteenth Century 23: 161–80.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. 1989a. “Prolegomena to Ethics and Evolution” (1894). In T.H. Huxley's “Evolution and Ethics,” eds. Paradis, James & Williams, George. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 59–104.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. 1989b. “Evolution and Ethics” (1893). In Huxley's “Evolution and Ethics,” 104–45.Google Scholar
Hyde, William. 1956. “The Socialism of H.G. Wells in the Early Twentieth Century.” Journal of the History of Ideas 17 (2): 217–34.Google Scholar
James, J. G. 1909. “The New Philosophy.” The Expository Times 20 (7): 296–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Simon. 2012. Maps of Utopia: H.G. Wells, Modernity and the End of Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
James, William. 1903. “Review of Sturt.” Personal Idealism, Mind 13 (2): 246—51.Google Scholar
James, William. 1979a. “The Will to Believe.” In James, The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy (1897). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, William. 1979b. “The Dilemma of Determinism” (1884). In James, Will to Believe.Google Scholar
James, William. 1979c. “The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life” (1891). In James, Will to Believe.Google Scholar
James, William. 1981. The Principles of Psychology (1890). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, William. 1994. The Correspondence of William James, III, eds. Skrupskelis, Ignas and Berkeley, Elizabeth. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
James, William. 2000. Pragmatism and Other Writings, ed. Gunn, Giles (1907). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
James, William. 2002. Correspondence, X.Google Scholar
James, William. 2003. Correspondence, XI.Google Scholar
James, William. 2004. Correspondence, XII.Google Scholar
James, William. 2016. “The Moral Equivalent of War” [1910]. In William James: Essays and Lectures, ed. Kamber, Richard. London: Routledge, 274–86.Google Scholar
Kuklick, Bruce. 2017. “Who Owns Pragmatism?” Modern Intellectual History [FirstView].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1913. A Preface to Politics. New York: Michael Kennerley.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 2000. “Taking a Chance” [1915]. In Lippmann, Force and Ideas: The Early Writings. London: Transaction.Google Scholar
Livingston, Alexander. 2016. Damn Great Empires! William James and the Politics of Pragmatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McLean, Steven. 2009. The Early Fiction of H.G. Wells: Fantasies of Science. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Merriam, Charles. 1920. American Political Ideas: Studies in the Development of American Political Thought, 1865–1917. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Muirhead, J. H. 1909. “Why Pluralism?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 9 (1): 183–225.Google Scholar
Orwell, George. 1970. “Wells, Hitler, and the World State.” In The Collected Essays, Journalism, and Letters of George Orwell, II, eds. Orwell, Sonia and Angus, Ian. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 172.Google Scholar
Paradis, James. 1989. “Evolution and Ethics in its Victorian Context.” In Huxley's “Evolution and Ethics,” 3–57.Google Scholar
Parrinder, Patrick. 1995. Shadows of the Future: H.G. Wells, Science Fiction and Prophecy. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Partington, John. 2003. Building Cosmopolis: The Political Thought of H.G. Wells. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Partington, John. 2008. “H.G. Wells: A Political Life.” Utopian Studies 19 (3): 517–76.Google Scholar
Perry, Ralph Barton. 1935. The Thought and Character of William James, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pihlström, Sami, ed. 2015. The Bloomsbury Companion to Pragmatism. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Planinc, Emma. 2017. “Catching up with Wells: The Political Thought of H.G. Wells's Science Fiction.” Political Theory 45 (5): 637–58.Google Scholar
Porrovecchio, Mark. 2011. F.C.S. Schiller and the Dawn of Pragmatism. Lanham: Lexington.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G. 1894. “Review of Kidd.” Social Evolution, International Journal of Ethics 5 (1): 107–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1956. Portraits from Memory and Other Essays. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Schiller, F. S. C. 1902. “Axioms as Postulates.” In Sturt, Personal Idealism, 47–134.Google Scholar
Schiller, F. S. C. 1907. “Review of James, Pragmatism.” Mind 16 (64): 598–604.Google Scholar
Schiller, F. S. C. 1912. “Critical Notice.” Mind 21 (81): 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shook, John, and Margolis, Joseph, eds. 2009. A Companion to Pragmatism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Alfred. 1901. The Use of Words in Reasoning. London: Black.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 2001. Visions of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skodo, Admir. 2015. “Eugenics and Pragmatism: F.C.S. Schiller's Philosophical Politics,” Modern Intellectual History [First View]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, David. 1986. H.G. Wells: Desperately Mortal. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, H. L. 1918. “The Alleged Egotism in the Demand for Personal Immortality.” The Biblical World 51 (1) (January): 19–30.Google Scholar
Thayer, Horace. 1968. Meaning and Action. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Toye, Richard. 2008. “H.G. Wells and the New Liberalism.” Twentieth Century British History 19 (2): 156–85.Google Scholar
Wagar, Warren. 2004. H.G. Wells: Traversing Time. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Wagar, Warren. 1961. H.G. Wells and the World State. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas. 2000. “Alfred Sidgwick: A Little-Known Precursor of Informal Logic and Argumentation.” Argumentation 14: 175–9.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 1894. Text-book of Biology, 2nd ed. London: Clive.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 1901. “Huxley.” Royal College of Science Magazine 13: 209–11.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 1902. “The Discovery of the Future.” Nature 65 (1684): 326–33.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 1903. Mankind in the Making. London: Chapman.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 1904. “Scepticism of the Instrument.” Mind 13 (51): 379–93.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 1907. “The So-Called Science of Sociology.” In An Englishman, 192–206.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 1908. New Worlds for Old. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 1912. “The Contemporary Novel.” In An Englishman, 148–70.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 1914a. An Englishman Looks at the World. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 1914b. “Is there a People?” In An Englishman, 245–51.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 1917. God the Invisible King. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 1932. The Work, Wealth and Happiness of Mankind. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 1942. The Conquest of Time. London: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 1975a. “The Rediscovery of the Unique” (1891). In Philmus & Hughes, Wells, 22–31.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 1975b. “Human Evolution, An Artificial Process” (1896). In Philmus & Hughes, Wells, 211–19.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 1975c. “Morals and Civilisation” (1897). In Philmus & Hughes, Wells, 220–8.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 1975d. “On Comparative Theology” (1898). In Philmus & Hughes, Wells, 40–6.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 1998. The Correspondence of H. G. Wells, ed. Smith, David, 4 vols. London: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 1999. Anticipations of the Reactions of Mechanical and Scientific Progress upon Human Life and Thought (1901). Mineola: Dover.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 2004. The Outline of History, Volume II, ed. Wagar, W. (1920). New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 2005a. A Modern Utopia, ed. Claeys, Gregory (1905). London: PenguinGoogle Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 2005b. The New Machiavelli, ed. James, Simon. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 2008. An Experiment in Autobiography, 2 vols. (1934). London: Faber.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 2016a. The Future in America: A Search after Realities (1906). London: Read.Google Scholar
Wells, Herbert George. 2016b. First and Last Things: A Confession of Faith and Rule of Life (1908). London: Read.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.