Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T23:22:15.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Power, Alliance, and the Escalation of International Conflict, 1815-1965

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Randolph M. Siverson  and
Michael R. Tennefoss
Randolph M. Siverson
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Michael R. Tennefoss
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A considerable amount of the international politics literature attempts to explain international conflict on the basis of the distribution of power between and among nations. There are, however, divergent views of this linkage. One view argues that wars are most likely to take place between nations of similar power, while another asserts that wars are most likely when power is unequal. Research seeking to explore this phenomenon has not investigated the capability augmenting effects of alliances on power relationships and has tended to focus its attention upon the occurrence of wars. This research examines the individual and joint effects of power and alliance upon the probability of 256 conflicts to escalate to reciprocated military action. The main finding is that equality of power, supplemented by alliance with a major power for those nations that are weak, tends to restrain the likelihood that a conflict will escalate.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 78 , Issue 4 , December 1984 , pp. 1057 - 1069
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 0000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, Y., Feinberg, S., & Holland, P.Discrete multivariate statistics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. P., & Leiss, A. C.Controlling small wars. New York: Knopf, 1969.Google Scholar
Boulding, K.Conflict and defense. New York: Harper and Row, 1962.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B.The war trap. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Craig, A., & George, A.Statecrcrft. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Dixon, W. J., & Brown, M. B.BMDP-79: Biomedical computer programs, P-Series. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1979.Google Scholar
East, M.Size and foreign policy behavior. World Politics, 1973, 25, 556–576.Google Scholar
Feinberg, S.The analysis of cross-classified categorical data. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Garnham, D.Dyadic international war, 1816-1955. Western Political Quarterly, 1976, 29, 231–242. (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnham, D.Power parity and lethal international violence, 1969-1973. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1976, 20, 379–394. (b)Google Scholar
George, A., & Smoke, R.Deterrence in American foreign policy. New York: Columbia University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Gochman, C.Studies in international violence: Five easy pieces? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1976, 20, 539–560.Google Scholar
Job, B.Membership in internation alliances, 1815-1965. In Zinnes, D. A. & Gillespie, J. V. (Eds.), Mathematical models in international relations. New York: Praeger, 1976.Google Scholar
Knoke, D., & Burke, P. J.Log-linear models. Sage university paper series, 07-20. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, A.Why big nations lose small wars: The politics of asymmetric conflict. World Politics, 1975, 27, 175–200.Google Scholar
Most, B. A., & Starr, H.Case selection, conceptualizations and basic logic in the study of war. American Journal of Political Science, 1982, 26, 834–856.Google Scholar
Organski, A. F. K.World politics (2nd ed.). New York: Knopf, 1968.Google Scholar
Organski, A. F. K., & Kugler, J.The war ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, S.War power and the willingness to suffer. In Russen, B. M. (Ed.), War, peace and numbers. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1972.Google Scholar
Russett, B. M.The calculus of deterrence. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1963, 7, 97–109.Google Scholar
Sabrosky, A. N.The utility of interstate alliances. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, 1975.Google Scholar
Singer, J. D.Accounting for international war: The state of the discipline. Annual Review of Sociology, 1980, 6, 349–367.Google Scholar
Singer, J. D., Bremer, S., & Stuckey, J.Capability distribution, uncertainty and major power war, 1820-1965. In Russett, B. (Ed.). War, peace and numbers. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1972.Google Scholar
Singer, J. D., & Small, M.Alliance aggregation and the onset of war, 1815-1945. In Singer, J. D. (Ed.), Qualitative international politics: Insights and evidence. New York: Free Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Singer, J. D., & Small, M.Foreign policy indicators: Predictors of war in history and in the state of the world message. Policy Sciences, 1974, 5, 271–296.Google Scholar
Singer, J. D., & Small, M.The wages of war. New York: Wiley, 1972.Google Scholar
Siverson, R. M., & Duncan, G. T.Stochastic models of international alliance initiation. In Zinnes, D. A. & Gillespie, J. V. (Eds.), Mathematical models of international relations. New York: Praeger, 1976.Google Scholar
Siverson, R. M., & King, J.Alliances and the expansion of war, 1815-1965. In Singer, J. D. & Wallace, M. (Eds.), To augur well. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1979.Google Scholar
Siverson, R. M., & Sullivan, M. P.The distribution of power and the onset of war. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1983, 27, 473–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siverson, R. M., & Tennefoss, M. R.Interstate conflicts: 1815-1965. International Interactions, 1982, 9, 147–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, M. P., & Siverson, R.Theories of war: Problems and prospects. In Hoppman, P. T., Zinnes, D. A., & Singer, J. D.. Cumulation in international relations research. Monograph series, World Affairs, 1981, 18, 9–38.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. J. P.The struggle for mastery in Europe: 1848-1918. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Waltz, K.Theory of international politics. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1979.Google Scholar
Weede, E.Extended deterrence by superpower alliance. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1983, 27, 231–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weede, E.Overwhelming preponderance as a pacifying condition among contiguous Asian dyads, 1950-1969. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1976, 20, 395–411.Google Scholar
Wholstetter, A.Theory and opposed system design. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1968, 20, 302–331.Google Scholar
Wight, M.Power politics. London: royal Institute of International Affairs, 1946.Google Scholar
Wright, Q.A study of war (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.