Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Dietz, Mary G.
1994.
“The Slow Boring of Hard Boards”: Methodical Thinking and the Work of Politics.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 88,
Issue. 4,
p.
873.
Johnson, James
and
Villa, Dana R.
1994.
Public Sphere, Postmodernism and Polemic.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 88,
Issue. 2,
p.
427.
Biskoivski, Lawrence J.
1995.
Politics Versus Aesthetics: Arendt's Critiques of Nietzsche and Heidegger.
The Review of Politics,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 1,
p.
59.
Cmiel, Kenneth
1996.
On Cynicism, Evil, and the Discovery of Communication in the 1940s.
Journal of Communication,
Vol. 46,
Issue. 3,
p.
88.
JOHNSON, JAMES
1997.
Communication, Criticism, and the Postmodern Consensus.
Political Theory,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 4,
p.
559.
Charney, Evan
1998.
Political Liberalism, Deliberative Democracy, and the Public Sphere.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 92,
Issue. 1,
p.
97.
Monberg, John
1998.
Making the Public Count: A Comparative Case Study of Emergent Information Technology-Based Publics.
Communication Theory,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
426.
Asen, Robert
1999.
Toward a Normative Conception of Difference in Public Deliberation.
Argumentation and Advocacy,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 3,
p.
115.
Triadafilopoulos, Triadafilos
1999.
Politics, Speech, and the Art of Persuasion: Toward an Aristotelian Conception of the Public Sphere.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 61,
Issue. 3,
p.
741.
James, Michael Rabinder
1999.
Tribal sovereignty and the intercultural public sphere.
Philosophy & Social Criticism,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 5,
p.
57.
Johnson, Pauline
2001.
Habermas's Search for the Public Sphere.
European Journal of Social Theory,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 2,
p.
215.
Olivo, Christiane
2001.
Creating a Democratic Civil Society in Eastern Germany.
p.
33.
Gordon, Neve
2002.
On Visibility and Power: An Arendtian Corrective of Foucault.
Human Studies,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 2,
p.
125.
Chambers, Simone
2003.
DELIBERATIVEDEMOCRATICTHEORY.
Annual Review of Political Science,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 1,
p.
307.
Brady, John S.
2004.
No Contest? Assessing the Agonistic Critiques of Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of the Public Sphere.
Philosophy & Social Criticism,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 3,
p.
331.
Roberts, John Michael
and
Crossley, Nick
2004.
Introduction.
The Sociological Review,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 1_suppl,
p.
1.
Germain, Randall D
2004.
Financial Governance and the Public Sphere: Towards a Global Modality of Governance?.
Policy and Society,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 3,
p.
68.
Barakso, Maryann
2005.
Civic Engagement and Voluntary Associations: Reconsidering the Role of the Governance Structures of Advocacy Groups.
Polity,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 3,
p.
315.
Gunaratne, Shelton A.
2006.
Public Sphere and Communicative Rationality: Interrogating Habermas's Eurocentrism.
Journalism & Communication Monographs,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 2,
p.
93.
Johnson, Pauline
2006.
Romantic and Enlightenment Legacies: Habermas and the Post-Modern Critics.
Contemporary Political Theory,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 1,
p.
68.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.