Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T23:33:26.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Presidential Speechmaking, 1949-1980

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Lyn Ragsdale
Lyn Ragsdale*
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The study provides an empirical analysis of the determinants and consequences of presidential speechmaking, defined as the occurrence of a major, nationally broadcast and televised address. Major speeches delivered by Presidents Truman through Carter are examined during the period 1949-1980. Using a probit analysis, a prediction is made of the likelihood of a major speech occurring within a month, based on the effects of public attitudes, national conditions, and events. The results indicate that changes in public approval ratings and the presence of visible national events increase the likelihood that a president will deliver a speech. Conversely, worsening economic conditions (inflation and unemployment) as well as expanding military situations decrease speechmaking efforts. The findings also demonstrate that a president's popularity increases significantly with the delivery of a major address.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 78 , Issue 4 , December 1984 , pp. 971 - 984
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, J., & Cnudde, C.Probing the bounds of conventional wisdom: A comparison of regression, probit, and discriminant analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 1975, 19, 571–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, R., & Page, B.The impact of events on presidential popularity: The Johnson and Nixon administrations. In Wildavsky, A. (Ed.). Perspectives on the presidency. Boston: Little, Brown, 1975.Google Scholar
Edelman, M.The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Edwards, G.The public presidency. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Gallup, G.The Gallup poll, public opinion 1935-1971. 3 vols. New York: Random House, 1972.Google Scholar
Gallup, G.The Gallup poll, public opinion 1972-1977. 2 vols. Wilmington, Del.: Scholarly Resources, Inc., 1978.Google Scholar
Gallup, G.Presidential popularity: A 43-year review. Gallup Opinion Index, 1980, Report 182.Google Scholar
Haight, T., & Brody, R.The mass media and presidential popularity. Communication Research, 1977, 4, 41–60.Google Scholar
Hanushek, E., & Jackson, J.Statistical methods for social scientists. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Hibbs, D.On the demand for economic outcomes: Macroeconomic performance and mass political support in the United States, Great Britain, and Germany. Journal of Politics, 1982, 44, 426–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, J.Econometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.Google Scholar
Kenski, H.The impact of economic conditions on presidential popularity. Journal of Politics, 1977, 39, 764–773.Google Scholar
Kernell, S.Explaining presidential popularity. American Political Science Review, 1978, 72, 506–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessel, J.The parameters of presidential politics. Social Science Quarterly, 1974, 55, 8–24.Google Scholar
Kessel, J.The seasons of presidential politics. Social Science Quarterly, 1977, 58, 418–435.Google Scholar
Lammers, W.Presidential attention-focusing activities. In Graber, D. (Ed.). The president and the public. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues, 1982, pp. 145–171.Google Scholar
Lee, J.Limits of leadership in foreign policy. Seoul: Seoul National University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Light, P.The president's agenda. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
MacKuen, M.Political drama, economic conditions, and the dynamics of presidential popularity. American Journal of Political Science, 1983, 27, 165–192.Google Scholar
McDiarmid, J.Presidential inaugural addresses—A study in verbal symbols. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1937, 1, 79–82.Google Scholar
Miller, L., & Sigelman, L.Is the audience the message? A note on LBJ's Vietnam statements. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1978, 42, 71–80.Google Scholar
Minow, N.et al.Presidential television. New York: Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar
Mueller, J.Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson. American Political Science Review, 1970, 64, 18–34.Google Scholar
Mueller, J.War, presidents, and public opinion. New York: Wiley, 1973.Google Scholar
Paletz, D., & Vinegar, R.Presidents on television: Effects of instant analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1977–1978, pp. 488–497.Google Scholar
Ragsdale, L.The fiction of congressional elections as presidential events. American Politics Quarterly, 1980, 8, 375–398.Google Scholar
Ragsdale, L.Presidential speechmaking and the public audience: A dialogue. Unpublished manuscript, University of Arizona, 1984.Google Scholar
Rutkus, D. A report on simultaneous television network coverage of presidential addresses to the nation. In U.S. Congress, House, Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, Hearings on Federal Communication Commission Oversight, March 2-3, 1976.Google Scholar
Shapiro, R., & Conforto, B.Presidential performance, the economy and the public's evaluation of economic conditions. Journal of Politics, 1980, 42, 49–67.Google Scholar
Stimson, J.Public support for American presidents: A cyclical model. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1976, 40, 1–21.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.