Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:54:15.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Politics and the Problem of Technology: An Essay on Heidegger and the Tradition of Political Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Jerry Weinberger
Jerry Weinberger*
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I examine Heidegger's postmodern interpretation of technology, with an eye to exposing its weaknesses. I do this by showing that his view entails an understanding of the tradition of political philosophy that cannot do justice to that tradition's own understanding of the character of technology. I consider first Plato and Aristotle and then Hobbes and Locke in order to suggest that Heidegger's view that modern politics are stamped by technological metaphysics can be challenged on two related grounds: (1) it assumes incorrectly that the tradition is dominated by dogmatic metaphysics; (2) it prevents us from seeing how some in the tradition both understood and doubted the possibility of a technological stamp. I then suggest an alternative view of technology that might account better for the character of technology and political life.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 86 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 112 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1992 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1963. On Revolution. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Blitz, Mark. 1981. Heidegger's Being and Time and the Possibility of Political Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Michael Allen. 1984. Hegel, Heidegger, and the Ground of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226309866.001.0001Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. [1927] 1972. Sein und Zeit [Being and Time], Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1933. Die Selbstbehauptung der deutschen Universität [The Self-Assertion of the German University]. Breslau: Korn.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1950. Holzwege [Woodcutter's Trails]. Frankfurt: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time. Trans. Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1967. Vorträge und Aufsätze [Lectures and Essays]. 3 vols. Pfullingen: Neske.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1971. Poetry, Language, Thought. Trans. Hofstadter, Albert. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1976. “Nur noch ein Gott kann uns retten” [Only a God Can Save Us Now]. Der Spiegel, 31 May, pp. 193–219.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1977. “The Question Concerning Technology” and Other Essays. Trans. Lovitt, William. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1982. The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Trans. Hofstadter, Albert. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1981. Leviathan. Ed. Macpherson, C. B.. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Jonas, Hans. 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kass, Leon. 1985. Toward a More Natural Science. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kolb, David. 1986. The Critique of Pure Modernity: Hegel, Heidegger, and After. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1965. Two Treatises of Government. Ed. Laslett, Peter. New York: Mentor.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey C. Jr., 1979. “On the Political Character of Property in Locke.” In Powers, Possessions, and Freedom, ed. Kontos, Alkis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1977. Capital, vol. 1. Trans. Fowkes, Ben. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Orwin, Clifford. 1975. “On the Sovereign Authorization.” Political Theory 3:26–44.10.1177/009059177500300103Google Scholar
Pinkard, Terry. 1987. Democratic Liberalism and Social Union. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Pinkard, Terry. 1988. Hegel's Dialectic: The Explanation of Possibility. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804397Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1964. The First and Second Discourses. Trans. Masters, Roger D. and Masters, Judith R.. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Schürmann, Reiner. 1987. Heidegger on Being and Acting: From Principles to Anarchy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Tarcov, Nathan. 1984. Locke's Education for Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weinberger, Jerry. 1988a. “Liberalism, Constitutionalism, and the Rediscovery of the State of Nature.” In The Revival of Constitutionalism, ed. Muller, James W.. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Weinberger, Jerry. 1988b. “Liberal Democracy and the Problem of Technology.” In Democratic Theory and Technologic Society, ed. Day, Richard B., Beiner, Ronald, and Masculli, Joseph. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Michael E. 1990. Heidegger's Confrontation with Modernity: Technology, Politics, Art. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.