Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-04T23:28:40.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Jurisprudence, the “New Institutionalism,” and the Future of Public Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Rogers M. Smith
Rogers M. Smith
Affiliation:
Yale University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For the last quarter century public-law studies have been dominated by “political jurisprudence,” which tries to understand law as a product of political forces. Critics claim this outlook, as now articulated, has generated fragmented empirical work disconnected from larger normative issues. This essay uses recent “institutionalist” or “structuralist” perspectives, based on critiques of pluralist political science and both Marxist and functionalist sociology, to propose a political approach to public law studies that can avoid such criticisms. If both empirical and normative public-law scholars took as their central concern the “dialectic of meaningful actions and structural determinants” and recast their research in several specified ways, they might be better able to describe the role of normative ideas in law and to achieve a broader empirical agenda that could ground and inform normative debates.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 82 , Issue 1 , March 1988 , pp. 89 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamany, David. 1980. The Supreme Court's Role in Critical Elections. In Realignment in American Politics, ed. Trilling, Richard J.. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel. 1960. A Functional Approach to Comparative Politics. In The Politics of the Developing Areas, ed. Almond, and Coleman, James S.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barbrook, Alec. 1975. Patterns of Political Behaviour. London: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert N., Madsen, Richard, Sullivan, William M., Swidler, Ann, and Tipton, Steven M.. 1985. Habits of the Heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand. 1980. On History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James, and Tullock, Gordon. 1962. The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Carter, Lief H. 1985. Contemporary Constitutional Lawmaking. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Connolly, William E. 1969. The Challenge to Pluralist Theory. In The Bias of Pluralism, ed. Connolly, William E.. New York: Atherton.Google Scholar
Danelski, David J. 1984. Law From a Political Perspective. Western Political Quarterly 36:548–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law's Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1953. The Political System. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1981. The Political System Besieged by the State. Political Theory 9:303–26.Google Scholar
Fehrenbacher, Don E. 1978. The Dred Scott Case. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Funston, Richard. 1975. The Supreme Court and Critical Elections. American Political Science Review 69:795–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1978. Judges' Role Orientation, Attitudes, and Decisions: An Interactive Model. American Political Science Review 72:911–24.Google Scholar
Goldman, Sheldon. 1982. Constitutional Law and Supreme Court Decisionmaking. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1984. Critical Legal Histories. Stanford Law Review 36:57–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, John Mark. 1985. The Political Economy of Group Membership. American Political Science Review 79:79–96.Google Scholar
Herzog, Don. 1985. Without Foundations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Klare, Karl. 1978. Judicial Deradicalization of the Wagner Act and the Origins of Modern Legal Consciousness, 1937–1941. Minnesota Law Review 62:265–339.Google Scholar
Lasser, William. 1985. The Supreme Court in Periods of Critical Realignment. Journal of Politics 47:1124–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl. 1960. The Bramble Bush. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1979. The End of Liberalism. 2nd ed. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Robert G. 1960. The American Supreme Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McConnell, Grant. 1966. Private Power and American Democracy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdaire. 1981. After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1984. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review 78:734–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G., and Simon, Herbert A.. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1986. Placing Parties in American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, Dennis C. 1979. Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter F. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
O'Brien, David M. 1984. Reconsidering Whence and Whither Political Jurisprudence. Western Political Quarterly 36:558–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur Jr., 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Orren, Karren. 1976. Standing to Sue: Interest Group Conflict in the Federal Courts. American Political Science Review 70:723–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1977. Economic Analysis of Law. 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1981. The Economics of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1980. Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions. American Political Science Review 74:432–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism against Populism. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1972. Policy Goals and Opinion Coalitions. Midwest Journal of Political Science 16:208–24.Google Scholar
Rohde, David W., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 1976. Supreme Court Decision Making. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1986. The Contingency of Community. London Review of Books 8:10–14.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H. 1969. An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science 13:1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin. 1984. The Maturation of Political Jurisprudence. Western Political Quarterly 36: 551–58.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart. 1974. The Politics of Rights. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon. 1975. Human Jurisprudence. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. 1984. Predicting Supreme Court Cases Probabilistically: The Search and Seizure Cases, 1962–81. American Political Science Review 78:891–900.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. 1986. Supreme Court Justices As Human Decision Makers: An Individual-Level Analysis of the Search and Seizure Cases. Journal of Politics 48:938–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Martin M. 1964. Law and Politics in the Supreme Court. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin M. 1978. The Supreme Court from Warren to Burger. In The New American Political System, ed. King, Anthony. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin M. 1981. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin M. 1984. Recent Developments in Political Jurisprudence. Western Political Quarterly 36:541–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Martin M. 1986. The Supreme Court's “Return” to Economic Regulation. In Studies in American Political Development, ed. Orren, Karren and Skowronek, Stephen. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1979. Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multi-Dimensional Voting Models. American Journal of Political Science 23:27–59.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1957. Administrative Behavior. 2d ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1984. Vision and Method in Historical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a New American State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1985. Liberalism and American Constitutional Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stumpf, Harry P. 1984. The Recent Past. Western Political Quarterly 36:534–41.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal. 1981. Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices. American Political Science Review 75: 355–67.Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert C., ed. 1978. The Marx-Engels Reader. 2d ed. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark V. 1981. The American Law of Slavery. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1983. The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups in America. American Political Science Review 77:390–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.