Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:06:30.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Political Economy of Governance Quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2021

MICHAEL M. TING Open the ORCID record for MICHAEL M. TING [Opens in a new window]
MICHAEL M. TING*
Affiliation:
Columbia University
*
Michael M. Ting, Professor of Political Science and International and Public Affairs, Department of Political Science and SIPA, Columbia University, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper develops a dynamic theory of the social and political foundations of governance quality. In the model, groups of citizens have different expected needs for a public service, and citizens choose whether to demand service when the need arises. Politicians representing these groups can determine policy benefits and delegate to bureaucrats the ability to invest in long-run service quality. The main feature of the theory is its foundation for citizen–government interactions, which draws from well-known queueing models of organizational service provision. The model provides a framework for characterizing the effectiveness and durability of government programs. A main implication is that politicized bureaucracies improve program survivability and increase the frequency of investment, while insulated bureaucracies increase the intensity of investment; overall service quality trades off between these two factors. Other results examine the implications of cross-group inequality, electoral conditions, and decentralization.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 115 , Issue 2 , May 2021 , pp. 667 - 685
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aberbach, Joel D., and Rockman, Bert A.. 2000. In the Web of Politics: Three Decades of the U.S. Federal Executive. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Akhtari, Mitra, Moreira, Diana, and Trucco, Laura. 2020. “Political Turnover, Bureaucratic Turnover, and the Quality of Public Services.” Unpublished Manuscript. University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Ando, Amy W. 1999. “Waiting to be Protected under the Endangered Species Act: The Political Economy of Regulatory Delay.” Journal of Law and Economics 42 (1): 29–60.10.1086/467417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, Jeff. 2018. “Fewer Crimes Get Counted When Police Are Slow To Respond.” Fivethirtyeight.com. Retrieved Feb. 23, 2020. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/fewer-crimes-get-counted-when-police-are-slow-to-respond.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Abhijit V. 1997. “A Theory of Misgovernance.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (4): 1289–1332.10.1162/003355300555484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednar, Jenna. 2011. “The Political Science of Federalism.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 7 (1): 269–288.10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beggs, A. W. 2001. “Queues and Hierarchies.” Review of Economic Studies 68 (2): 297–322.10.1111/1467-937X.00170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Christopher R., Burden, Barry C., and Howell, William G.. 2010. “After Enactment: The Lives and Deaths of Federal Programs.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (1): 1–17.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00414.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy, and Persson, Torsten. 2009. “The Origins of State Capacity: Property Rights, Taxation, and Politics.” American Economic Review 99 (4): 1218–1244.10.1257/aer.99.4.1218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilmes, Linda J., and Neal, Jeffrey R.. 2003. “The People Factor: Human Resources Reform in Government.” In For the People: Can We Fix Public Service? eds. Donahue, John D. and Nye, Joseph S. Jr., 113–133. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Blanes i Vidal, Jordi, and Kirchmaier, Tom. 2018. “The Effect of Police Response Time on Crime Clearance Rates.” Review of Economic Studies 85 (2): 855–891.10.1093/restud/rdx044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Alexander, Potter, Rachel Augustine, and Thrower, Sharece. 2016. “Organizational Capacity, Regulatory Review, and the Limits of Political Control.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 32 (2): 242–271.10.1093/jleo/ewv025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussell, Jennifer. 2019. Clients and Constituents: Political Responsiveness in Patronage Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190945398.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callander, Steven, and Martin, Gregory J.. 2017. “Dynamic Policymaking with Decay.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (1): 50–67.10.1111/ajps.12258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862-1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2002. “Groups, the Media, Agency Waiting Costs, and FDA Drug Approval.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 490–505.10.2307/3088394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2004. “Commentary: Staff Resources Speed FDA Drug Review: A Critical Analysis of the Returns to Resources in Approval Regulation.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 29 (3): 431–442.10.1215/03616878-29-3-431CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, Daniel P., and Lewis, David E.. 2004. “Political Learning from Rare Events: Poisson Inference, Fiscal Constraints, and the Lifetime of Bureaus.” Political Analysis 12 (3): 201–232.10.1093/pan/mph016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlström, Carl, Lapuente, Victor, and Teorell, Jan. 2012. “The Merit of Meritocratization: Politics, Bureaucracy, and the Institutional Deterrents of Corruption.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (3): 656–668.10.1177/1065912911408109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dal Bó, Ernesto, Finan, Frederico, and Rossi, Martín A.. 2013. “Strengthening State Capabilities: The Role of Financial Incentives in the Call to Public Service.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 128 (3): 1169–1218.10.1093/qje/qjt008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derthick, Martha. 1990. Agency Under Stress: The Social Security Administration in American Government. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1967. Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little Brown.10.7249/CB156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, David, and O’Halloran, Sharyn. 1999. Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making Under Separate Powers. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511609312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francois, Patrick. 2000. “Public Service Motivation as an Argument for Government Provision.” Journal of Public Economics 78 (3): 275–299.10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00075-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gailmard, Sean, and Patty, John W.. 2007. “Slackers and Zealots: Civil Service, Policy Discretion and Bureaucratic Expertise.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 873–889.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00286.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gailmard, Sean, and Patty, John W.. 2012. “Formal Models of Bureaucratic Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 15: 353–377.10.1146/annurev-polisci-031710-103314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R., and Gibson, Clark C.. 2009. “Balancing Regionalism and Localism: How Institutions and Incentives Shape American Transportation Policy.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (3): 633–648.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00391.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratton, Gabriele, Guiso, Luigi, Michelacci, Claudio, and Morelli, Massimo. 2020. “From Weber to Kafka: Political Instability and the Overproduction of Laws.” Unpublished Manuscript. Bocconi University.Google Scholar
Gross, Donald, Shortle, John F., Thompson, James M., and Harris, Carl M.. 2008. Fundamentals of Queueing Theory (4th edition). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.10.1002/9781118625651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heclo, Hugh. 1977. A Government of Strangers: Executive Politics in Washington. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Herd, Pamela, and Moynihan, Donald P.. 2018 Administrative Burden: Policymaking by Other Means. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Herron, Michael C., and Smith, Daniel A.. 2016. “Precinct Resources and Voter Wait Times.” Electoral Studies 42: 249–263.10.1016/j.electstud.2016.02.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Alexander V., and Shotts, Kenneth W.. 2012. “Policy-Specific Information and Informal Agenda Power.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (1): 67–83.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00538.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollibaugh, Gary E., Horton, Gabriel, and Lewis, David E.. 2014. “Presidents and Patronage.” Journal of Politics 58 (4): 1024–1042.Google Scholar
Horn, Murray J. 1995. The Political Economy of Public Administration. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511528163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John D., and McCarty, Nolan M.. 2004. “Bureaucratic Capacity, Delegation, and Political Reform.” American Political Science Review 98 (3): 481–494.10.1017/S0003055404001297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank. 2018. Wait No More: Citizens, Red Tape, and Digital Government. eds. Roseth, Benjamin, Reyes, Angela, Santiso, Carlos. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Herbert. 1976. Are Government Organizations Immortal? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Keefer, Philip, and Khemani, Stuti. 2005. Democracy, Public Expenditures, and the Poor: Understanding Political Incentives for Providing Public Services. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
Krause, George A., Lewis, David E., and Douglas, James W.. 2006. “Political Appointments, Civil Service Systems, and Bureaucratic Competence: Organizational Balancing and Executive Branch Revenue Forecasts in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 770–787.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00215.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruks-Wisner, Gabrielle. 2018. Claiming the State: Active Citizenship and Social Welfare. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108185899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David E. 2007. “Testing Pendleton’s Premise: Do Political Appointees Make Worse Bureaucrats?” Journal of Politics 69 (4): 1073–1088.10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00608.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Lui, Francis T. 1985. “An Equilibrium Queueing Model of Bribery.” Journal of Political Economy 93 (4): 760–781.10.1086/261329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maranto, Robert. 1998. “Thinking the Unthinkable in Public Administration: A Case for Spoils in the Federal Bureaucracy.” Administration and Society 29 (6): 623–642.10.1177/009539979802900603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 1982. “Regulatory Performance and Presidential Administration.” American Journal of Political Science 26 (2): 197–224.10.2307/2111036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 1985. “The Politicized Presidency.” In The New Direction in American Politics, eds. Chubb, John E. and Peterson, Paul E., 235–271. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 1989. “The Politics of Bureaucratic Structure.” In Can the Government Govern? eds. Chubb, John E. and Peterson, Paul E. 267–329. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Mueller, Hannes. 2015. “Insulation or Patronage: Political Institutions and Bureaucratic Efficiency.” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 15 (3): 961–996.10.1515/bejeap-2013-0084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naor, P. 1969. “The Regulation of Queue Size by Levying Tolls.” Econometrica 37 (1) 15–24.10.2307/1909200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nath, Anusha. 2015. “Bureaucrats and Politicians: How Does Electoral Competition Affect Bureaucratic Performance?” IED Working Paper 269.Google Scholar
Pepinsky, Thomas B., Pierskalla, Jan H., and Sacks, Audrey. 2017. “Bureaucracy and Service Delivery.” Annual Review of Political Science 20: 249–268.10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prendergast, Canice. 2003. “The Limits of Bureaucratic Efficiency.” Journal of Political Economy 111 (5): 929–958.10.1086/376956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffer, Pia. 2019. “Does Political Oversight of the Bureaucracy Increase Accountability? Field Experimental Evidence from an Electoral Autocracy.” Unpublished Manuscript. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Rainey, Hal G., and Steinbauer, Paula. 1999. “Galloping Elephants: Developing Elements of a Theory of Effective Government Organizations.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9 (1): 1–32.10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauch, James E. 1995. “Bureaucracy, Infrastructure, and Economic Growth: Evidence from U.S. Cities During the Progressive Era.” American Economic Review 85 (4): 968–979.Google Scholar
Rogger, Daniel. 2018. “The Consequences of Political Interference in Bureaucratic Decision Making: Evidence from Nigeria.” World Bank Development Economics Research Group, Policy Research Working Paper 8554.Google Scholar
Romig, Kathleen. 2017. “More Cuts to Social Security Administration Funding Would Further Degrade Service.” Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Retrieved Feb. 23, 2020. https://www.cbpp.org/research/social-security/cuts-weakening-social-security-administration-services.Google Scholar
Rosen, Stephen P. 1988. “New Ways of War: Understanding Military Innovation.” International Security 13 (1): 134–168.10.2307/2538898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slough, Tara. 2020. “Bureaucrats Driving Inequality in Access: Experimental Evidence from Colombia.” Unpublished Manuscript. New York University.Google Scholar
Ting, Michael M. 2017. “Politics and Administration.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (2): 305–319.10.1111/ajps.12273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ting, Michael M., Folke, Olle, Hirano, Shigeo, and Snyder, James. 2013. “Elections and Reform: The Adoption of Civil Service Systems in the U.S. States.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 25 (3): 363–387.10.1177/0951629812453217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Ian. 2019. “Political Agency, Oversight, and Bias: The Instrumental Value of Politicized Policymaking.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 35 (3): 544–578.10.1093/jleo/ewz011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ujhelyi, Gergely. 2014. “Civil Service Reform.” Journal of Public Economics 118: 15–25.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.06.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Government Accountability Office. 2014. “Elections: Observations on Wait Times for Voters on Election Day 2012.” Report GAO-14-850.Google Scholar
United States Government Accountability Office. 2015. “VA Mental Health: Action Needed to Improve Access Policies and Wait-Time Data.” Report GAO-16-170T.Google Scholar
United States Government Accountability Office. 2018. “Aviation Security: TSA Uses Data to Monitor Airport Operations and Respond to Increases in Passenger Wait Times and Throughput.” Report GAO-18-563T.Google Scholar
United States Social Security Administration. 2018. “Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Overview.” Retrieved November 30, 2020. https://www.ssa.gov/budget/FY18Files/2018BO.pdf.Google Scholar
Vakilifathi, Mona. 2019. “Do Electorally-Vulnerable Legislators Grant More or Less Statutory Discretion?” Unpublished Manuscript. New York University.Google Scholar
Whitford, Andrew B. 2005. “The Pursuit of Political Control by Multiple Principals.” Journal of Politics 67 (1): 28–49.10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00306.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilke, Anna. 2020. “How Does the State Replace the Community? Experimental Evidence on Crime Control from South Africa.” Unpublished Manuscript. Columbia University.Google Scholar
Wilson, Jeremy M., Chermak, Steve, Corsaro, Nicholas, Grammich, Clifford, and Gruenewald, Jeffrey. 2018. “A Multi-Site Assessment of Police Consolidation: Final Summary Overview.” U.S. National Criminal Justice Reference Service Report 252503.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Ting supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Ting supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 611.9 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.