Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:53:02.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Culture and Political Preferences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

David D. Laitin  and
Aaron Wildavsky
David D. Laitin
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Aaron Wildavsky
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aaron Wildavsky has argued that it is theoretically more useful to think of political preferences as rooted in political culture than to entertain alternative bases such as schemas or ideologies. In the APSA presidential address in which he made his case, Wildavsky also advocated a program of research on political cultures, and welcomed “challenges and improvements.” David Laitin accepts the invitation; he variously takes issue with Wildavsky's concept of political culture.

Type
Controversies
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 82 , Issue 2 , June 1988 , pp. 589 - 597
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ames, Bruce. 1983. Dietary Carcinogens and Anti carcinogens. Science 221:1256–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Bruce. 1987. Ranking Possible Carcinogenic Hazards. Science 236:271–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barth, Frederick. 1969. Ethnic Croups and Boundaries. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert. 1983. Modernization, Ethnic Competition, and the Rationality of Politics in Contemporary Africa. In Ethnicity, State Coherence, and Public Policy, ed. Rothchild, Donald and Olorunsola, Victor. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Cohen, Abner. 1974. Two-Dimensional Man. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1970. Natural Symbols: Exploration in Cosmology. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1982. Cultural Bias. In In the Active Voice. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary, and Wildavsky, Aaron. 1982. Risk and Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Laitin, David. 1986. Hegemony and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, George, and Fischer, Michael. 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Metzger, Thomas. 1977. Escape from Predicament. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pye, Lucien, and Verba, Sidney. 1965. Political Culture and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, Stanley, and Lichter, S. Robert. 1987. Elite Ideology and Risk Perception in Nuclear Energy Policy. American Political Science Review 81:383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Michael, and Schwarz, Michiel. 1985. Beyond the Politics of Interest. Paper presented at the thirteenth world congress of the International Political Science Association. Paris.Google Scholar
Truman, David. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1985. Change in Political Culture. Politics 20:95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1987. Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation. American Political Science Review 81:3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron, and Thompson, Michael. N.d. The Foundations of Cultural Theory. University of California, Berkeley. Typescript.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.