Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:40:21.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws, 1945–85

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Arend Lijphart*
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego

Abstract

A systematic analysis of the relationships between the main electoral system variables (electoral formula, district magnitude, and ballot structure) and electoral outcomes (the degrees of disproportionality and multipartism) in the 20 Western democracies from 1945 to 1985—representing 32 distinct electoral systems (an electoral system being defined as a set of elections held under basically the same rules)—shows that the effects of both formula and magnitude on proportionality are very strong, much stronger than Douglas W. Rae and subsequent researchers have suggested; that on the other hand, their effects on the number of parties participating in elections is surprisingly weak; and that ballot structure affects the degree of multipartism only in single-member district systems. These findings suggest that strategic behavior by politicians and voters plays a less important role in reducing multipartism than is usually assumed.

Type
Research Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balinski, Michel L., and Peyton Young, H.. 1982. Fair Representation: Meeting the Ideal of One Man, One Vote. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Peter. 1965. French Electoral Systems and Elections since 1789. Hamden, CT: Archon.Google Scholar
Carstairs, Andrew McLaren. 1980. A Short History of Electoral Systems in Western Europe. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Dittberner, Jürgen. 1987. FDP–Partei der zweiten Wahl: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der liberalen Partei und ihrer Funktionen im Parteiensystem der Bundesrepublik. Opladen: Westdeutscher.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1963. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gunther, Richard. 1989. “Electoral Laws, Party Systems, and Elites: The Case of Spain.” American Political Science Review 83: 835–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard S. 1980. A Theory of Parties and Electoral Systems. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laakso, Markku, and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. “The ‘Effective’ Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12:327.Google Scholar
Leonard, Dick, and Natkiel, Richard. 1987. World Atlas of Elections: Voting Patterns in 39 Democracies. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1985. “The Field of Electoral Systems Research: A Critical Survey.” Electoral Studies 4: 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1986. “Degrees of Proportionality of Proportional Representation Formulas.” In Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences, ed. Grofman, Bernard and Lijphart, Arend. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
Loosemore, John, and Hanby, Victor J.. 1971. “The Theoretical Limits of Maximian Distortion: Some Analytic Expressions for Electoral Systems.” British Journal of Political Science 1: 467–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luxembourg. Service Central de la Statistique. 1984. “Les élections législatives de 1945 à 1984.” Bulletin du Statec 30: 119–31.Google Scholar
Mackie, Thomas T. 1985. “General Elections in Western Nations during 1984.” European Journal of Political Research 13: 335–39.Google Scholar
Mackie, Thomas T. 1986. “General Elections in Western Nations during 1985.” European Journal of Political Research 14: 695–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, Thomas T., and Rose, Richard. 1982. The International Almanac of Electoral History. 2d ed.New York: Facts on File.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, Thomas T., and Rose, Richard. 1983. “General Elections in Western Nations during 1982.” European Journal of Political Research 11: 345–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, Thomas T., and Rose, Richard. 1984. “General Elections in Western Nations during 1983.” European Journal of Political Research 12:335–42.Google Scholar
Nohlen, Dieter. 1978. Wahlsysteme der Welt–Daten und Analysen: Ein Handbuch. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Norman J., Mann, Thomas E., and Malbin, Michael J.. 1987. Vital Statistics on Congress, 1987–1988. Washington: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Rae, Douglas W. 1971. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. 2d ed.New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1986. “Duvergeťs Law Revisited.” In Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences, ed. Grofman, Bernard and Lijphart, Arend. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard. 1984. “Electoral Systems: A Question of Degree or of Principle?” In Choosing an Electoral System: Issues and Alternatives, ed. Lijphart, Arend and Grofman, Bernard. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1986. “The Influence of Electoral Systems: Faulty Laws or Faulty Methods?” In Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences, ed. Grofman, Bernard and Lijphart, Arend. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
Spreafico, Alberto. 1983. “Systèmes électoraux et système politique en Italie depuis 1945.” In Les modes de scrutin des dix-huit pays libres de l'Europe occidentale—leurs résultats et leurs effets comparés: Élections nationales et europeenes, ed. Cadart, Jacques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Taagepera, Rein, and Grofman, Bernard. 1985. “Rethinking Duverger's Law: Predicting the Effective Number of Parties in Plurality and PR Systems–Parties Minus Issues Equals One.” European Journal of Political Research 13: 341–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taagepera, Rein, and Shugart, Matthew S.. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Van den Bergh, G. 1955. Unity in Diversity: A Systematic Critical Analysis of All Electoral Systems. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.