Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-04T23:31:54.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Competition in Legislative Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2018

STEFAN KRASA  and
MATTIAS K. POLBORN
STEFAN KRASA*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois
MATTIAS K. POLBORN*
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University
*
Stefan Krasa is a Professor, Department of Economics, University of Illinois, 1407 W. Gregory Dr., Urbana, IL 61801 ([email protected]).
Mattias K. Polborn is a Professor, Department of Economics and Department of Political Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We develop a theory of electoral competition in multidistrict legislative elections when nomination decisions are made by local policy-motivated party members, and voters care about both local and national positions. We show that the asymmetry generated by different national party positions reduces or even entirely removes the competitive pressure to nominate moderate candidates. The model has important implications for our understanding of policy divergence and, in particular, of the effects of gerrymandering.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 112 , Issue 4 , November 2018 , pp. 809 - 825
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are very grateful for the comments of three referees and the editor that helped us to improve the paper. Both authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from National Science Foundation Grant SES-1261016. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or any other organization. We are thankful for helpful comments by seminar participants at USC, Caltech, NYU, MPI Munich, ITAM, Toulouse, Illinois, Princeton, Western Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Notre Dame, UC Irvine, Illinois State, Mannheim, ETH Zurich, Brigham Young, New Economic School, Higher School of Economics, Yale, Southern Methodist and Vanderbilt, as well as Odilon Camara, Tiberiu Dragu, Bernie Grofman, Matthias Messner, and Arturas Rozenas. Replication files are available on the American Political Science Review Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/SNW8PV.

References

REFERENCES

Adams, James, and Merrill, Samuel. 2003. “Voter Turnout and Candidate Strategies in American Elections.” Journal of Politics 65, 161–89.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Party Politics in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Leblanc, William, and Snyder, James M. Jr. 2012. “When Parties Are Not Teams: Party Positions in Single-Member District and Proportional Representation Systems.” Economic Theory 49 (3), 521–47.Google Scholar
Aragones, Enriqueta, and Palfrey, Thomas R.. 2002. “Mixed Equilibrium in a Downsian Model with a Favored Candidate.” Journal of Economic Theory 103 (1), 131–61.Google Scholar
Austen-Smith, David. 1984. “Two-party Competition with Many Constituences.” Mathematical Social Sciences 7 (2), 177–98.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, Daniel, Duggan, John, and Squintani, Francesco. 2007. “Electoral Competition with Privately-Informed Candidates.” Games and Economic Behavior 58 (1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, Dan, and Ingberman, Daniel E.. 1985. “Candidate Reputations and the ‘Incumbency Effect’.” Journal of Public Economics 27 (1), 47–67.Google Scholar
Besley, Timothy, and Coate, Steve. 1997. “An Economic Model of Representative Democracy.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 85–114.Google Scholar
Bierbrauer, Felix J., and Boyer, Pierre C.. 2013. “Political Competition and Mirrleesian Income Taxation: A First Pass.” Journal of Public Economics 103, 1–14.Google Scholar
Callander, Steven. 2005. “Electoral Competition in Heterogeneous Districts.” Journal of Political Economy 113, 1116–45.Google Scholar
Callander, Steven. 2008. “Political Motivations.” Review of Economic Studies 75 (3), 671–97.Google Scholar
Calvert, Randall L. 1985. “Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model: Candidate Motivations, Uncertainty, and Convergence.” American Journal of Political Science 29, 69–95.Google Scholar
Camara, Odilon. 2012. “Economic Policies of Heterogeneous Politicians.” Mimeo, USC.Google Scholar
Castanheira, Micael. 2003. “Why Vote for Losers?” Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (5), 1207–38.Google Scholar
Castanheira, Micael, and Crutzen, Benoit S.. 2010. “Comparative Politics with Endogenous Intra-Party Discipline.” Mimeo, Erasmus University Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Coate, Stephen, and Conlin, Michael. 2004. “A Group Rule–Utilitarian Approach to Voter Turnout: Theory and Evidence.” American Economic Review 94 (5), 1476–504.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diermeier, Daniel, and Vlaicu, Razvan. 2011. “Parties, Coalitions, and the Internal Organization of Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 105 (2), 359–80.Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash, and Londregan, John. 1995. “Redistributive Politics and Economic Efficiency.” American Political Science Review 89 (4), 856–66.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar
Eguia, John X. 2011a. “Endogenous Parties in an Assembly.” American Journal of Political Science 55, 16–26.Google Scholar
Eguia, John X. 2011b. “Voting Blocs, Party Discipline and Party Formation.” Games and Economic Behavior 73, 111–35.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert, and Romero, David. 1990. “Candidate Equilibrium and the Behavioral Model of the Vote.” American Political Science Review 84, 1103–26.Google Scholar
Feddersen, Timothy, and Sandroni, Alavaro. 2006. “A Theory of Participation in Elections.” American Economic Review 96 (4), 1271–82.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Thomas W., and Krehbiel, Keith. 1989. “Asymmetric Information and Legislative Rules with a Heterogeneous Committee.” American Journal of Political Science 33, 459–90.Google Scholar
Groseclose, Tim. 2001. “A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (4), 862–86.Google Scholar
Gul, Faruk, and Pesendorfer, Wolfgang. 2009. “Partisan Politics and Aggregation Failure with Ignorant Voters.” Journal of Economic Theory 144, 146–74.Google Scholar
Halberstam, Yosh, and Montagnes, B. Pablo. 2015. “Presidential Coattails versus the Median Voter: Senator Selection in US Elections.” Journal of Public Economics 121, 40–51.Google Scholar
Hinich, Melvin J., and Munger, Michael C.. 1994. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Krasa, Stefan, and Polborn, Mattias. 2010a. “The Binary Policy Model.” Journal of Economic Theory 145, 661–88.Google Scholar
Krasa, Stefan, and Polborn, Mattias. 2010b. “Competition between Specialized Candidates.” American Political Science Review 104 (4), 745–65.Google Scholar
Krasa, Stefan, and Polborn, Mattias. 2012. “Political Competition between Differentiated Candidates.” Games and Economic Behavior 76, 249–71.Google Scholar
Krasa, Stefan, and Polborn, Mattias. 2014. “Social Ideology and Taxes in a Differentiated Candidates Framework.” American Economic Review 104, 308–22.Google Scholar
Lindbeck, Assar, and Weibull, Jurgen. 1987. “Balanced-Budget Redistribution as the Outcome of Political Competition.” Public Choice 52, 273–97.Google Scholar
Londregan, John, and Romer, Thomas. 1993. “Polarization, Incumbency, and the Personal Vote.” In Political Economy: Institutions, Competition, and Representation, eds. Barnett, W., Hinich, M. and Schofield, N., pp. 355–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martinelli, Cesar. 2001. “Elections with Privately Informed Parties and Voters.” Public Choice 108 (1), 147–67.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2009a. “Does Gerrymandering Cause Polarization?” American Journal of Political Science 53 (3), 666–80.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2009b. “Gerrymandering Didn’t Cause the Shutdown.” Bloomberg, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-09/gerrymandering-didn-t-cause-the-shutdown.html.Google Scholar
Osborne, Martin, and Slivinski, Al. 1996. “A Model of Political Competition with Citizen Candidates.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 111, 65–96.Google Scholar
Palfrey, Thomas R. 1984. “Spatial Equilibrium with Entry.” Review of Economic Studies 51, 139–56.Google Scholar
Patty, John W. 2008. “Equilibrium Party Government.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (3), 636–55.Google Scholar
Polborn, Mattias K., and Snyder, James M.. 2017. “Party Polarization in Legislatures with Office-Motivated Candidates.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 132 (3), 1509–50.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2000. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rohde, David W. 2010. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” American Political Science Review 81, 85–104.Google Scholar
Snyder, James M. 1994. “Safe Seats, Marginal Seats, and Party Platforms: The Logic of Platform Differentiation.” Economics & Politics 6 (3), 201–13.Google Scholar
Soubeyran, Raphael. 2009. “Does a Disadvantaged Candidate Choose an Extremist Position?” Annales d’Economie et de Statistique 93–94, 328–48.Google Scholar
Van Weelden, Richard. 2013. “Candidates, Credibility, and Re-Election Incentives.” Review of Economic Studies 80 (4), 1622–51.Google Scholar
Volden, Craig, and Bergman, Elizabeth. 2006. “How Strong Should Our Party Be? Party Member Preferences over Party Cohesion.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31 (1), 71–104.Google Scholar
Winer, Stanley L., Kenny, Lawrence W., and Grofman, Bernard. 2014. “Explaining Variation in the Competitiveness of US Senate Elections, 1922–2004.” Public Choice 161 (3-4), 471– 97.Google Scholar
Wittman, Donald. 1983. “Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative Theories.” American Political Science Review 77, 142–57.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Krasa and Polborn Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/SNW8PV
Link
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.