Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T19:59:56.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Partisan Orientations over the Long Haul: Results from the Three-Wave Political Socialization Panel Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

M. Kent Jennings  and
Gregory B. Markus
M. Kent Jennings
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara and The University of Michigan
Gregory B. Markus
Affiliation:
The University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The present study examines the dynamics of partisanship and voting behavior by utilizing national survey panel data gathered in 1965, 1973, and 1982 from two strategically situated generations—members of the high school senior class of 1965 and their parents. At the aggregate level, generational effects appeared in the persistently weaker partisan attachments of the younger generation. At the individual level, strong effects based on experience and habituation appeared in the remarkable gains occurring in the stability of partisan and other orientations among the young as they aged from their mid-20s to their mid-30s. Dynamic modeling of the relationship between partisanship and voting choice demonstrated that the younger voters had stabilized at an overall weaker level of partisanship, leading to more volatile voting behavior which, in turn, failed to provide the consistent reinforcement needed to intensify preexisting partisan leanings.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 78 , Issue 4 , December 1984 , pp. 1000 - 1018
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, P. R.Developing party identification: A further examination of life cycle, generational, and period effects. American Journal of Political Science, 1979, 23, 78–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, P. R., Aldrich, J. H., & Rohde, D. W.Change and continuity in the 1980 elections (Rev. ed.). Washington D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, 1983.Google Scholar
Beck, P. A.A socialization theory of partisan realignment. In Niemi, R. G. (Ed.). The politics of future citizens. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.Google Scholar
Beck, P. A., & Jennings, M. K.Political periods and political participation. American Political Science Review, 1979, 73, 737–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, R. A.Stability and change in party identification: Presidential to off-years. Presented at the 1977 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., September, 1977.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E.The American voter. New York: John Wiley, 1960.Google Scholar
Converse, P. E.The dynamics of party support. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1976.Google Scholar
Converse, P. E., & Markus, O. B.Plus ca change…: The new CPS election study panel. American Political Science Review, 1979, 73, 32–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, J.On being an independent partisan supporter. Presented at the 1981 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Cincinnati, Ohio, April, 1981.Google Scholar
Fiorina, M. P.Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Franklin, C. H. Policy preferences and party identification. American Journal of Political Science (in press).Google Scholar
Franklin, C. H., & Jackson, J. E.The dynamics of party identification. American Political Science Review, 1983, 77, 957–973.Google Scholar
Howell, S. E.The behavioral component of changing partisanship. American Politics Quarterly, 1980, 8, 279–302.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. E.Issues, party choices, and presidential votes. American Journal of Political Science, 1975, 19, 161–185.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. K., Barnes, S. H., Farah, B. G., & Ingle-hart, R.Perceptions of injustice in American society. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Seattle, Washington, March, 1983.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. K., & Niemi, R. G.The political character of adolescence. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. K., & Niemi, R. G.Generations and politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, D. R., & Kiewiet, D.Sociotropic politics: The American case. British Journal of Political Science, 1981, 11, 129–161.Google Scholar
Lambert, T. A.Generations and change: Toward a theory of generations as a force in historical processes. Youth and Society, 1972, 4, 21–46.Google Scholar
Mannheim, K.The problem of generations. In Kecskemeti, P. (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1952.Google Scholar
Markus, G. B.Dynamic modelling of cohort change: The case of political partisanship. American Journal of Political Science, 1983, 27, 717–739.Google Scholar
Markus, G. B.Political attitudes during an election year: A report on the 1980 NES panel study. American Political Science Review, 1982, 76, 558–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, G. B.The political environment and the dynamics of public attitudes: A panel study. American Journal of Political Science, 1979,25, 338–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, G. B., & Converse, P. E.A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice. American Political Science Review, 1979, 73, 1055–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, W. E., Miller, A. H., & Schneider, E. J.American national election studies data sourcebook, 1952-1978. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Petrocik, J. R.An analysis of intransitivities in the index of party identification. Political Methodology, 1974, 7(3), 31–48.Google Scholar
Shively, W. P.The development of party identification among adults: Explanation of functional model. American Political Science Review, 1979, 73, 1039–1054.Google Scholar
Valentine, D. C., & Van Wingen, J. R.Partisanship, independence, and the partisan identification question. American Politics Quarterly, 1980, 8 165–186.Google Scholar
Weisberg, H. F.A multidimensional conceptualization of party identification. Political Behavior, 1980, 2, 33–60.Google Scholar
Wiley, D. E., & Wiley, J. A.The estimation of measurement error in panel data. American Sociological Review, 1970, 55, 112–117.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.