Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T00:26:14.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Partisan Dealignment in the American Electorate: Itemizing the Deductions since 1964

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1982

Helmut Norpoth  and
Jerrold G. Rusk
Helmut Norpoth
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Stony Brook
Jerrold G. Rusk
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to the SRC-CPS surveys, the proportion of Americans identifying with a political party declined sharply between 1964 and 1976, from approximately 75 percent to 63 percent. In order to cast some light on the reasons for this dealignment, we examine the contributions made by the changing age composition of the electorate, the entry of new voters into the electorate, the party desertion among voters already in the electorate, and the suppression of age gains in partisanship. These four sources are shown to explain close to 100 percent of the aggregate decline from 1964 to 1976, with the single largest contribution made by entry of new voters. Nevertheless our findings indicate that the decline occurred throughout all age cohorts and suggest the potency of dealigning period forces. These forces simply had their strongest effect on those voters with predictably the least resistance, the youngest cohorts.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , September 1982 , pp. 522 - 537
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Paul R. 1976. Generational change and the decline of party identification in America: 1952–1974. American Political Science Review 70:469–78.10.2307/1959651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, Paul R. 1978. Generational replacement and partisan dealignment in Britain and the United States. British Journal of Political Science 8:505–9.10.1017/S000712340000154XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, Paul R. 1979. Developing party identification: a further examination of life-cycle, generational and period effects. American Journal of Political Science 23: 78–96.10.2307/2110772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Paul Allen. 1976. A socialization theory of partisan dealignment. In Controversies in American voting behavior, eds. Niemi, R. G. and Weisberg, H. F., pp. 396–411. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Beck, Paul Allen 1977. Partisan dealignment in the postwar South. American Political Science Review 71: 477–96.10.1017/S0003055400267403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Richard W. 1972. Popular control of public policy: a normal vote analysis of the 1968 election. American Political Science Review 66:429–49.10.2307/1957787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1970. Critical elections and the mainsprings of American politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus; Converse, P. E.; Miller, W. E.; and Stokes, D. E. 1960. The American voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Campbell, Bruce A. 1977. Patterns of change in the partisan loyalties of native southerners: 1952–1972. Journal of Politics 39:730–61.10.2307/2129650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, Gosta, and Karlsson, Katarina. 1970. Age, cohorts and the generation of generations. American Sociological Review 35:710–18.10.2307/2093946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassel, Carol A. 1977. Cohort analysis of party identification among southern whites, 1952–1972. Public Opinion Quarterly 41:28–33.10.1086/268349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claggett, William. 1981. Partisan acquisition versus partisan intensity: life-cycle, generation, and period effects, 1952–1976. American Journal of Political Science 25:193–214.10.2307/2110849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clymer, Adam. 1981. Public prefers a balanced budget to large cuts in taxes, poll shows. New York Times, 02 1.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1969. Of time and partisan stability. Comparative Political Studies 2:139–71.10.1177/001041406900200201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1976. The dynamics of party support. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1979. Rejoinder to Abramson. American Journal of Political Science 23:97–100.10.2307/2110773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E.; Miller, W. E.; Rusk, J. G.; and Wolfe, A. C. 1969. Continuity and change in American politics: parties and issues in the 1968 election. American Political Science Review 63:1083–1105.10.1017/S0003055400263211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crewe, Ivor. 1980. Prospects for party realignment: an Anglo-American comparison. Comparative Politics 12:379–400.10.2307/421832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, Norval D. 1972. Sources of the shift to political independence: some evidence from a cohort analysis. Social Science Quarterly 53:494–519.Google Scholar
Glenn, Norval D. 1977. Cohort Analysis. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 07–005. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Hochstein, Avram. 1972. Alignment and dealignment in France and the United States. Comparative Political Studies 5:343–72.10.1177/001041407200500304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Niemi, Richard G. 1975. Continuity and change in political orientations: a longitudinal study of two generations. American Political Science Review 69:1316–35.10.2307/1955291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoke, David, and Hout, Michael. 1974. Social and demographic factors in American political party affiliations. American Sociological Review 39:700–13.10.2307/2094315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, Everett Carll, with Hadley, Charles D. 1975. Transformations of the American party system. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas, and Wolfinger, Raymond. 1980. Candidates and parties in congressional elections. American Political Science Review 74:617–32.10.2307/1958145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Karen O.; Mason, W. M.; Winsborough, H. H.; and Poole, W. K. 1973. Some methodological issues in cohort analysis of archival data. American Sociological Review 38:242–58.10.2307/2094398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur H.; Miller, W. E.; Raine, A. S.; and Brown, T. A. 1976. A majority party in disarray: policy polarization in the 1972 election. American Political Science Review 70:753–78.10.2307/1959866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., and Miller, Warren E. 1977. Partisanship and performance: ‘rational’ choice in the 1976 presidential elections. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association meeting in Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E. 1981. Ideology in the 1980 elections: elite interpretations and the reality of mass behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association in Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Nie, Norman H.; Verba, S.; and Petrocik, J. 1976. The changing American voter. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Riley, Matilda W. 1973. Aging and cohort succession: interpretations and misinterpretations. Public Opinion Quarterly 37:35–49.10.1086/268058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shively, W. Phillips. 1979. The relationship between age and party identification: a cohort analysis. Political Methodology 6:437–460.Google Scholar
Sundquist, James L. 1973. Dynamics of the party system. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Herbert F., and Rusk, Jerrold G. 1970. Dimensions of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review 64:1167–85.10.2307/1958364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.