Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Clinton, Joshua D.
2012.
Using Roll Call Estimates to Test Models of Politics.
Annual Review of Political Science,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 1,
p.
79.
Krehbiel, Keith
and
Peskowitz, Zachary
2012.
Legislative Organization and Ideal-Point Bias.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Clinton, Joshua D.
2012.
Congress, Lawmaking, and the Fair Labor Standards Act, 1971–2000.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 2,
p.
355.
Carroll, Royce
Lewis, Jeffrey B.
Lo, James
Poole, Keith T.
and
Rosenthal, Howard
2013.
The Structure of Utility in Spatial Models of Voting.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 4,
p.
1008.
Peress, Michael
2013.
Estimating Proposal and Status Quo Locations Using Voting and Cosponsorship Data.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 75,
Issue. 3,
p.
613.
Guinaudeau, Isabelle
2014.
Toward a conditional model of partisanship in policymaking.
French Politics,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 3,
p.
265.
Enns, Peter K.
Kelly, Nathan J.
Morgan, Jana
Volscho, Thomas
and
Witko, Christopher
2014.
Conditional Status Quo Bias and Top Income Shares: How U.S. Political Institutions Have Benefited the Rich.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 76,
Issue. 2,
p.
289.
Nokken, Timothy P.
2014.
Comparing Agenda Content and Roll-call Behaviour in Regular and Lame-duck Sessions of the House of Representatives, 1879–2010.
The Journal of Legislative Studies,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 4,
p.
430.
Asmussen, Nicole
and
Ramey, Adam
2014.
When Loyalty is Tested: Do Party Leaders Use Committee Assignments as Rewards?.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Richman, Jesse
2015.
The Electoral Costs of Party Agenda Setting: Why the Hastert Rule Leads to Defeat.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 77,
Issue. 4,
p.
1129.
Woon, Jonathan
and
Cook, Ian Palmer
2015.
Competing Gridlock Models and Status Quo Policies.
Political Analysis,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 3,
p.
385.
Robinson, Gregory
2015.
Competing Agendas in Theories of Congress: Assessing Agenda Control Using Counterfactual Data.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 77,
Issue. 3,
p.
749.
Shin, Jae Hyeok
2015.
Voter Demands for Patronage: Evidence from Indonesia.
Journal of East Asian Studies,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 1,
p.
127.
Shor, Boris
and
Rogowski, Jon
2015.
Ideology and the US Congressional Vote.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Krehbiel, Keith
and
Peskowitz, Zachary
2015.
Legislative organization and ideal-point bias.
Journal of Theoretical Politics,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 4,
p.
673.
McGrath, Robert J.
Rogowski, Jon C.
and
Ryan, Josh M.
2015.
Gubernatorial Veto Powers and the Size of Legislative Coalitions.
Legislative Studies Quarterly,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 4,
p.
571.
Gray, Thomas R.
and
Jenkins, Jeffery A.
2017.
Unpacking pivotal politics: exploring the differential effects of the filibuster and veto pivots.
Public Choice,
Vol. 172,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
359.
Branham, J. Alexander
and
Jessee, Stephen A.
2017.
Modeling spending preferences & public policy.
Electoral Studies,
Vol. 49,
Issue. ,
p.
155.
Clinton, Joshua D.
2017.
Coding the Ideological Direction and Content of Policies.
Annual Review of Political Science,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 1,
p.
433.
Waldhauser, Christoph
Hochreiter, Ronald
and
Hochreiter, R.
2017.
Shaking the trees: Abilities and Capabilities of Regression and Decision Trees for Political Science.
ITM Web of Conferences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. ,
p.
00009.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.