Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:13:53.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Opinion Representation versus Social Representation; or, Why Women Can't Run as Women and Win

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Jerry Perkins  and
Diane L. Fowlkes
Jerry Perkins
Affiliation:
Texas Tech
Diane L. Fowlkes
Affiliation:
Georgia State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article, by employing voting simulations in a survey of party activists, examines responses to a woman's claim to party office on the basis of her sex. The degree of acceptance of this claim or the willingness to grant what is called social representation, is contrasted with the respondents' inclinations to select candidates favorable to women's rights, or the willingness to grant what is called opinion representation. Variations in responses to the two simulations are analyzed in terms of attitudes toward gender roles, government intervention and the legitimacy of groups in the political process. Voting in the simulation involving opinion representation can best be understood in terms of the respondent's attitude toward government intervention, while the simulation involving social representation activates the attitude toward groups. Discussion of the findings focuses on the dilemma of group claims for minority representation in a liberal democratic context and the need for better understanding of attitudes toward groups among political elites.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , September 1980 , pp. 92 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aberbach, Joel D., and Walker, Jack L. (1971). Race in the City. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Adam, William C. (1975). “Candidate Characteristics, Office of Election, and Voter Responses.” Experimental Study of Politics 4: 76–88.Google Scholar
Darcy, R., and Schramm, Sarah Slavin (1977). “When Women Run Against Men.” Public Opinion Quarterly 41: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Otis Dudley (1966). “Path Analysis: Sociological Examples.” American Journal of Sociology 72: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowlkes, Diane L., Perkins, Jerry and Rinehart, Sue Tolleson (1979). “Gender Roles and Party Roles.” American Political Science Review 73: 772–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gitelson, Alan R., and Gitelson, Idy B. (1977). “Adolescents' Attitudes toward Male and Female Political Candidates.” Experimental Study of Politics 6: 31–58.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. (1977). “Convention Quotas and Communal Representation.” British Journal of Political Science 7: 255–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstone, J. David, and Peterson, Paul E. (1973). Race and Authority in Urban Politics. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Hacker, Helen Mayer (1951). “Women as a Minority Group.” Social Forces 30: 60–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Thomas, Norman (1968). “Men and Women in Party Elites: Social Roles and Political Resources.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 12: 469–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karnig, Albert B., and Walter, B. Oliver (1976). “Election of Women to City Councils.” Social Science Quarterly 56: 605–13.Google Scholar
Kim, Jae-On (1975). “Factor Analysis.” In Nie, Norman H., et al., Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Jeane J. (1975). “Representation in the American National Conventions: The Case of 1972.” British Journal of Political Science 5: 265–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, Everett Carl Jr. with Hadley, Charles D. (1978). Transformations of the American Party System: Political Coalitions from the New Deal to the 1970s, 2nd ed. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lee, Marcia Manning (1976). “Why Few Women Hold Public Office: Democracy and Sexual Roles.” Political Science Quarterly 91: 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. (1979). The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States, 2nd ed. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey C. Jr., and Scigliano, Robert (1978). Representation. Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Mend, Michael R., Bell, Tony and Bath, Lawrence (1976). “Dynamics of Attitude Formation Regarding Women in Politics.” Experimental Study of Politics 5: 25–39.Google Scholar
Mezey, Susan Gluck (1978a). “Does Sex Make a Difference? A Case Study of Women in Politics.” Western Political Quarterly 31: 492–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezey, Susan Gluck (1978b) “Women and Representation: The Case of Hawaii.” Journal of Politics 40: 369–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and Levitin, Teresa E. (1976). Leadership and Change: Presidential Elections From 1952 to 1976. Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranney, Austin (1975). Curing the Mischiefs of Faction. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranney, Austin (1968). “The Representativeness of Primary Electorates.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 12: 224–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, Janet, and Helmreich, Robert (1972). “The Attitudes Toward Women Scale: An Objective Instrument to Measure Attitudes Toward the Rights and Roles of Women in Contemporary Society.” Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 2: 66.Google Scholar
Stokes, Donald E. (1971). “Compound Paths in Political Analysis.” In Bernd, J. L. and Herndon, J. F. (eds.), Mathematical Applications in Political Science. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.