No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 November 2012
The subtitle's placement of its apostrophe means something: While all previous “front matter” (as well as the “In This Issue” summary that follows) has been a collective product, in this final “UCLA” issue I want to speak as Lead Co-editor, the post I have held for most of the Review's tenure here. (Dan Treisman served as Acting Lead in our initial year, and very special thanks are due to him).
1 Privately, Lyndon Johnson is supposed to have argued for the public accommodations sections of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 by saying, “Damn it, a man has a right not to be humiliated in front of his children.” Publicly, he said at the signing ceremony, “Now the Negro families no longer suffer the humiliation of being turned away because of their race” (April 11, 1968: http://millercenter.org/president/speeches/detail/4036).
2 The analysis adopts the thirteen categories used in the Supreme Court Database (Spaeth et al.). These include such rubrics as First Amendment, Civil Rights, Privacy, Economic Activity, and Federalism.
4 One widely accepted guide to such norms is given by the American Anthropological Association's Code of Ethics, particularly Section III. http://www.aaanet.org/issues/policy-advocacy/upload/AAA-Ethics-Code-2009.pdf
5 Behavior Genetics 42 (2012): 1–2, DOI 10.1007/s10519–011-9504-z
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.