Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:55:30.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes from the Editors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2010

Extract

This issue's articles address three broad themes, each of which looms large in present-day political science: (a) revolution, civil war, and nationalism; (b) representation and deliberation; and (c) domestic and international sources of governments' economic policies.

Type
From the Editor: In This Issue
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Even, or perhaps especially, liberals scarcely aware of their liberalism have developed similar (mostly utilitarian) balancing rules, for example, between economies of scale in governance and the benefits of cultural autonomy (Alberto Alesina and Enrico Spolaore, The Size of Nations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003).

2 February 2009, 103 (1): 59–81.

3 See, for instance, the Center for Deliberative Democracy at Stanford University: http://cdd.stanford.edu; the Centre for Deliberative Democracy & Global Governance at Australian National University: http://deliberativedemocracy.anu.edu.au; or the Deliberative Democracy Consortium at http://www.deliberative-democracy.net

4 Kevin M. Esterling, Ryan P. Kennedy, David M. J. Lazer, and Anand E. Sokhey.

5 Given that the Iversen & Soskice article takes as its starting point some work on which APSR Managing Co-Editor Ronald Rogowski was a co-author, it is appropriate to note that Rogowski recused himself from all stages of this article's consideration for publication.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.