No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 February 2012
We welcome the Editorial Statement from the incoming University of North Texas (UNT) team and express our gratitude for their kind words about our tenure and policies. We are coordinating regularly with them to insure a smooth handoff, and we want to explain to our readers (and potential contributors) how—following the precedent of Lee Sigelman's handoff to us—the transition will work.
1 Christopher Adolph and Mingxing Liu.
2 For parallel findings on career incentives during the Great Leap Forward (where advancement depended chiefly on overfulfillment of regional grain quotas), see Kung, and Chen, , “The Tragedy of the Nomenklatura,” this Review (2011) 105: 27–45Google Scholar.
3 Note that “rhetoric” encompasses something quite distinct from “oratory.” Few can have heard Lincoln's speeches, and indeed some of his most powerful rhetoric took the form of open letters. Churchill's rhetoric was embodied mostly in speeches, yet usually only the House of Commons heard them; the British public read, rather than heard, his vivid rhetoric. Even Roosevelt's addresses, although often preserved in recordings, lose little of their power on the printed page.
5 One widely accepted guide to such norms is given by the American Anthropological Association's Code of Ethics, particularly Section III. http://www.aaanet.org/issues/policy-advocacy/upload/AAA-Ethics-Code-2009.pdf
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.