Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-04T23:27:14.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

[no title]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Hwa Yol Jung
Hwa Yol Jung*
Affiliation:
Moravian College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Communications
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 67 , Issue 3 , September 1973 , pp. 964 - 965
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “Leo Strauss's Conception of Political Philosophy: A Critique,” The Review of Politics, 29 (October, 1967), 492–517 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Miller's Straussian position is clearer in his “Political Philosophy and Human Nature,” The Personalist, 53 (Summer, 1972), 209–21Google Scholar.

2 For a phenomenological critique of behavioralist episteraology and ontology, see the author's forthcoming article “A Critique of the Behavioral Persuasion in Politics: A Phenomenological View,” in Phenomenology and the Social Sciences, ed. Natanson, Maurice, 2 vols. (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1973)Google Scholar.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.