Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:29:02.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Models for New Labour: The Political Economy of Labour Party Support, January 1992–April 1997

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Harold D. Clarke ,
Marianne C. Stewart  and
Paul F. Whiteley
Harold D. Clarke
Affiliation:
University of North Texas
Marianne C. Stewart
Affiliation:
University of Texasat Dallas
Paul F. Whiteley
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article uses newly available British time-series data to analyze dynamic interrelationships among Labour vote intentions, perceptions that the Labour leader would make the best prime minister, and Labour party identification. Error-correction models reveal that best prime minister perceptions and party identification have important short- and long-run influences on vote intentions. Tests of rival models indicate that personal economic expectations outperform other economic evaluations in the vote intention and party identification analyses. National retrospective judgments perform well in analyses of best prime minister perceptions, and emotional reactions to economic conditions significantly influence these perceptions as well as party identification.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 92 , Issue 3 , September 1998 , pp. 559 - 575
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramson, Paul R., and Ostrom, Charles W.. 1991. “Macropartisanship: An Empirical Assessment.” American Political Science Review 85(March):181–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 1992. “Social Psychology, Demographic Variables, and Linear Regression: Breaking the Iron Triangle in Voting Research.” Political Behavior 14(September):195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alogoskoufis, George, and Smith, Ron. 1995. “On Error Correction Models: Specification, Interpretation, Estimation.” In Surveys in Econometrics, ed. Oxley, Les, George, Donald A. R., Roberts, Colin J., and Sayer, Stuart. Oxford: Blackwell. Pp. 139–70.Google Scholar
Alt, James E. 1984. “Dealignment and the Dynamics of Partisanship in Britain.” In Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Societies, ed. Beck, Paul Allen, Dalton, Russell, and Flanagan, Scott. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Pp. 298–329.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Anindya, Dolado, Juan, Galbraith, John W., and Hendry, David F.. 1993. Co-integration, Error-Correction, and the Econometric Analysis of Non-Stationary Data. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel. 1992. “Comparing Dynamic Specifications: The Case of Presidential Approval.” In Political Analysis, vol. 3, ed. Stimson, James A.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Pp. 51–88.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel. 1993. “The Methodology of Cointegration.” In Political Analysis, vol. 4, ed. Freeman, John R. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Pp. 237–48.Google Scholar
Bishop, George F., Tuchfarber, Alfred J., Smith, Andrew E., Abramson, Paul R., and Ostrom, Charles W. Jr. 1994. “Question Form and Context Effects in the Measurement of Partisanship: Experimental Tests of the Artifact Hypothesis.” American Political Science Review 88(December):945–58.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Smith, Renée. 1996. “The Dynamics of Aggregate Partisanship.” American Political Science Review 90(September):567–80.Google Scholar
Breusch, T. S., and Pagan, Adrian R.. 1979. “A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation.” Econometrica 47(September):1287–94.Google Scholar
Budge, Ian, Crewe, Ivor, and Farlie, Dennis, eds., 1976. Party Identification and Beyond: Representations of Voting and Party Competition. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Butler, David, and Stokes, Donald E.. 1976. Political Change in Britain, 2d college ed. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1966. Elections and the Political Order. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Gurin, Gerald, and Miller, Warren E.. 1954. The Voter Decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Charemza, Wojciech W., and Deadman, Derek F.. 1997. New Directions in Econometric Practice, 2d ed. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., and Stewart, Marianne C.. 1984. “Dealignment of Degree: Partisan Change in Britain 1974–83.” Journal of Politics 46(August):689–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., and Stewart, Marianne C.. 1995. “Economic Evaluations, Prime Ministerial Approval and Governing Party Support: Rival Models Reconsidered.” British Journal of Political Science 25(April):597–622.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., Stewart, Marianne C., and Whiteley, Paul. 1997. “Tory Trends: Party Identification and the Dynamics of Conservative Support Since 1992.” British Journal of Political Science 26(April):299–318.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., and Suzuki, Motoshi. 1994. “Partisan Dealignment and the Dynamics of Independence in the American Electorate, 1953–88.” British Journal of Political Science 24(January):57–78.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Feldman, Stanley. 1986. “Emotional Reactions to the Economy: I'm Mad as Hell and I'm Not Going to Take It Anymore.” American Journal of Political Science 30(February):50–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, Feldman, Stanley, and Knight, Kathleen. 1986. “Judging Inflation and Unemployment: The Origins of Retrospective Evaluations.” Journal of Politics 48(August):565–88.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnson, Feldman, Stanley, and Knight, Kathleen. 1987. “The Personal and Political Underpinnings of Economic Forecasts.” American Journal of Political Science 31(August):559–83.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1976. The Dynamics of Party Support: Cohort-Analyzing Party Identification. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Crewe, Ivor. 1985. “How to Win a Landslide Without Really Trying: Why the Conservatives Won in 1983.” In Britain at the Polls 1983, ed. Ranney, Austin. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Pp. 155–96.Google Scholar
Crewe, Ivor. 1986. “On the Death and Resurrection of Class Voting: Some Comments on How Britain Votes.” Political Studies 35(December):620–38.Google Scholar
Crewe, Ivor, and King, Anthony. 1994. “Did Major Win? Did Kinnock Lose?: Leadership Effects in the 1992 British General Election.” In Labour's Last Chance? The 1992 Election and Beyond, ed. Heath, Anthony, Jowell, Roger, and Curtice, John. Aidershot, UK: Dartmouth. Pp. 125–48.Google Scholar
Crewe, Ivor, Sarlvik, Bo, and Alt, James E.. 1977. “Partisan Dealignment in Britain, 1964–1974.” British Journal of Political Science 7(April):129–90.Google Scholar
DeBoef, Suzanna, and Granato, Jim. 1995. “Near-Integration, Cointegration, and Error Correction Models.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Political Methodology Section, American Political Science Association, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
DeBoef, Suzanna, and Granato, Jim. 1997a. “Near-Integrated Data and the Analysis of Political Relationships.” American Journal of Political Science 41(April):619–40.Google Scholar
DeBoef, Suzanna, and Granato, Jim. 1997b. “Overdifferencing: Implications for the Time Series Study of Political Relationships.” Department of Political Science, Pennsylvania State University. Typescript.Google Scholar
Denver, David. 1998. “The Government That Could Do No Right.” In New Labour Triumphs: Britain at the Polls, ed. King, Anthony. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House. Pp. 15–48.Google Scholar
Dickey, David A., and Fuller, Wayne A.. 1979. “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Series with a Unit Root.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74(June):427–31.Google Scholar
Dunleavy, Patrick, and Husbands, Christopher T.. 1985. British Democracy at the Crossroads: Voting and Party Competition in the 1980s. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Durr, Robert H. 1993a. “An Essay on Cointegration and Error Correction Models.” In Political Analysis, vol. 4, ed. Freeman, John R.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Pp. 185–228.Google Scholar
Durr, Robert H. 1993b. “Of Forests and Trees.” In Political Analysis, vol. 4, ed. Freeman, John R.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Pp. 255–8.Google Scholar
Engle, Robert F., and Granger, Clive W.J.. 1987. “Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing.” Econometrica 55(March):251–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, Robert F., and Yoo, Sam. 1991. “Cointegrated Economic Time Series: An Overview with New Results.” In Long-Run Economic Relationships, ed. Engle, Robert F. and Granger, Clive W.J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 237–66.Google Scholar
Ericsson, Neil R., and Irons, John S., eds. 1994. Testing Exogeneity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Robert H. 1988. Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles H. 1984. “Issues, Preferences, Socialization and the Evolution of Party Identification.” American Journal of Political Science 28(August):459–78.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles H. 1992. “Measurement and the Dynamics of Party Identification.” Political Behavior 4(September):297–310.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles H., and Jackson, John E.. 1983. “The Dynamics of Party Identification.” American Political Science Review 77(December):957–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, Clive W.J., and Newbold, Paul. 1974. “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics.” Journal of Econometrics 2(1):111–20.Google Scholar
Gujarati, Damodar N. 1988. Basic Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hamilton, James D. 1994. Time Series Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Richard. 1995. Using Cointegration Analysis in Econometric Modelling. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Heath, Anthony, Jowell, Roger, and Curtice, John. 1985. How Britain Votes. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Heath, Anthony, Jowell, Roger, Curtice, John, Evans, Geoff, Field, Julia, and Witherspoon, Sharon. 1991. Understanding Political Change: The British Voter 1964–1987. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Heath, Anthony, et al., eds. 1994. Labour's Last Chancel Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Heath, Anthony, and MacDonald, Sarah-K.. 1988. “The Demise of Party Identification Theory?” Electoral Studies 7(August):95–108.Google Scholar
Heath, Anthony, and Pierce, Roy. 1992. “It Was Party Identification All Along: Question Order Effects on Reports of Party Identification in Britain.” Electoral Studies 11(June):93–105.Google Scholar
Hendry, David. 1980. “Econometrics—Alchemy or Science?” Economica 47(November):387–406.Google Scholar
Hendry, David. 1995. Dynamic Econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1989. “Macropartisanship.” American Political Science Review 83(December):1125–42.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1996. “Comment.” Journal of Politics 58(August):793–801.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., Stimson, James A., Abramson, Paul R., and Ostrom, Charles W. Jr. 1992. “Controversy: Question Wording and Macropartisanship.” American Political Science Review 86(June):475–86.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E. 1988. “The Structure of Emotional Response: 1984 Presidential Candidates.” American Political Science Review 82(September):737–62.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., and MacKuen, Michael B.. 1993. “Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement During Presidential Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 87(September):672–85.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E. 1991. “Party Identification: Back to Basics.” American Political Science Review 85(June):557–70.Google Scholar
Miller, William L. 1989. “Studying How the Economy Affects Public Attitudes and Behavior: Problems and Prospects.” In Economic Decline and Political Change: Canada, Great Britain, the United States, ed. Clarke, Harold D., Stewart, Marianne C., and Zuk, Gary. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Pp. 143–72.Google Scholar
Miller, William L., Clarke, Harold D., Harrop, Martin, LeDuc, Lawrence, and Whiteley, Paul F.. 1990. How Voters Change: The 1987 British Election Campaign in Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Richard, Niemi, Richard G., and Amato, Timothy. 1996. “Prospective and Comparative or Retrospective and Individual? Party Leaders and Party Support in Great Britain.” British Journal of Political Science 26(April):245–58.Google Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut. 1992. Confidence Regained: Economics, Mrs. Thatcher, and the British Voter. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut. 1996a. “Presidents and the Prospective Voter.” Journal of Politics 58(August):776–92.Google Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut. 1996b. “Rejoinder.” Journal of Politics 58(August):802–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, Philip. 1998. “The Conservative Party: ‘In Office but Not in Power.’” In New Labour Triumphs: Britain at the Polls, ed. King, Anthony. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House. Pp. 75–112.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Charles W. Jr., and Smith, Renée M.. 1993. “Error Correction, Attitude Persistence, and Executive Rewards and Punishments: A Behavioral Theory of Presidential Approval.” In Political Analysis, vol. 4, ed. Freeman, John R.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Pp. 127–85.Google Scholar
Perron, Pierre. 1989. “The Great Crash, the Oil Shock and the Unit Root Hypothesis.” Econometrica 57(November):1361–402.Google Scholar
Perron, Pierre. 1990. “Testing for a Unit Root in a Time Series with a Changing Mean.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 8(April):153–62.Google Scholar
Pesaran, M. Hashem, and Pesaran, Bahram. 1997. Microfit 4.0. Cambridge, UK: Camfit Data.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard, and McAllister, Ian. 1990. The Loyalties of Voters: A Lifetime Learning Model. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sanders, David. 1991. “Government Popularity and the Next General Election.” Political Quarterly 62(April):235–61.Google Scholar
Sanders, David. 1993. “Why the Conservatives Won—Again.” In Britain at the Polls 1992, ed. King, Anthony, Crewe, Ivor, Denver, David, Newton, Kenneth, Norton, Philip, Sanders, David, and Seyd, Patrick. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House. Pp. 171–222.Google Scholar
Sanders, David. 1995. “The Economy and Support for the Conservative Party, 1979–96.” Presented at the annual conference of the Political Studies Association, University of York, York, England.Google Scholar
Sanders, David, Marsh, David, and Ward, Hugh. 1993. “The Electoral Impact of Press Coverage of the British Economy, 1979–87.” British Journal of Political Science 23(April):175–210.Google Scholar
Sarlvik, Bo, and Crewe, Ivor. 1983. Decade of Dealignment: The Conservative Victory of 1979 and Electoral Trends in the 1970s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Renée M. 1993. “Error Correction, Attractors, and Cointegration: Substantive and Methodological Issues.” In Political Analysis, vol. 4, ed. Freeman, John R.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Pp. 249–54.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A., and Tetlock, Philip E.. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, Marianne C., and Clarke, Harold D.. 1992. “The (Un)Importance of Party Leaders: Leader Images and Party Choice in the 1987 British Election.” Journal of Politics 54(May):447–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, James H. 1991. “Confidence Intervals for the Largest Autoregressive Root in U.S. Macroeconomic Time Series.” Journal of Monetary Economics 28(December):435–59.Google Scholar
White, Halbert. 1980. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica 48(May):817–38.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Paul. 1997. “The Conservative Campaign.” Parliamentary Affairs 50(October 1997):542–54.Google Scholar
Williams, John T. “What Goes Around Comes Around: Unit Root Tests and Cointegration.” In Political Analysis, vol. 4, ed. Freeman, John R.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Pp. 229–36.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.