Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T21:48:50.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Multiple Effects of Casualties on Public Support for War: An Experimental Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2008

SCOTT SIGMUND GARTNER
SCOTT SIGMUND GARTNER*
Affiliation:
The University of California, Davis
*
Scott Sigmund Gartner is Professor, Department of Political Science, The University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Public support for a conflict is not a blank check. Combat provides information people use to update their expectations about the outcome, direction, value, and cost of a war. Critical are fatalities—the most salient costs of conflict. I develop a rational expectations theory in which both increasing recent casualties and rising casualty trends lead to decreased support. Traditional studies neither recognize nor provide a method for untangling these multiple influences. I conduct six experiments, three on the Iraq War (two with national, representative samples) and three with a new type of panel experiment design on hypothetical military interventions. The results of hazard and ordered logit analyses of almost 3,000 subjects support a rational expectations theory linking recent casualties, casualty trends, and their interaction to wartime approval. I also examine the effects of the probability of victory, information levels, and individual characteristics on the support for war, and contrast results from representative and convenience samples.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 102 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 95 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baum, Mathew A. 2002. “The Constituent Foundation of the Rally-Round-the-Flag Phenomenon.” International Studies Quarterly 46 (2): 263–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Matthew A. 2003. Soft News Goes to War: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy in the New Media Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J. 2006. “Assuming the Costs of War: Events, Elites and American Public Support for Military Conflict.” Working Paper, MIT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., and Druckman, James N.. 2007. “Public Opinion Research and Support for the Iraq War.” Public Opinion Quarterly 71 (1): 126–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boettcher, William A. III. 1995. “Prospect Theory in International Relations.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 39 (3): 561–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boettcher, William A., and Cobb, Michael D.. 2006. “Echoes of Vietnam? Casualty Framing and Public Perceptions of Success and Failure in Iraq.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (6): 831–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Richard A. 1991. Assessing the President. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph, and Morrow, James. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, Jamie, Jenkins, Jeffrey, Rohde, David, and Souva, Mark. 2001. “The Impact of National Tides and District-Level Effects on Electoral Outcomes: The U.S. Congressional Elections of 1862-63.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (4): 887–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N. 2004. “Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects.” The American Political Science Review 98 (4): 671–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, George C. III, and Swenson, Tami. 1997. “Who Rallies The Anatomy of a Rally Event?” The Journal of Politics 59 (1): 200–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichenburg, Richard C. 2003. “Gender Differences in Public Attitudes Toward the Use of Force by the United States, 1990–2003.” International Security 28 (1): 110–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichenburg, Richard C. 2005. “Victory has Many Friends: U.S. Public Opinion and the Use of Military Force, 1981–2005.” International Security 30 (1): 140–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feaver, Peter D., and Gelpi, Christopher. 2004. Choosing Your Battles: American Civil-Military Relations and the Use of Force. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Fordham, Benjamin O. 2006. “Economic Interests and Public Support for American Foreign Policy.” Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Gartner, Scott Sigmund. 1997. Strategic Assessment in War. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gartner, Scott Sigmund. 2004. “Making the International Local: The Terrorist Attack on the USS Cole, Local Casualties, and Media Coverage.” Political Communication 21 (2): 139–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, Scott Sigmund, and Segura, Gary M.. 1998. “War, Casualties and Public Opinion.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (3): 278–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, Scott Sigmund, and Segura, Gary. 2000. “Race, Opinion and Casualties in the Vietnam War.” The Journal of Politics 62 (1): 115–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, Scott Sigmund, and Segura, Gary M.. 2005. “A General Theory of War Casualties and Public Opinion.” Western Political Science Association Annual Meeting. Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
Gartner, Scott Sigmund, and Segura, Gary M.. Forthcoming (January 2008). “All Politics are Still Local: The Iraq War and the 2006 Midterm Elections.” PS: Political Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, Scott Sigmund, Segura, Gary M., and Barratt, Bethany. 2004. “Casualties, Positions and Senate Elections in the Vietnam War.” Political Research Quarterly 53 (3): 467–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartzke, Erik. 1998. “Kant We All Just Get Along?: Opportunity, Willingness, and the Origins of the Democratic Peace.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartzke, Erik. 2000. “Preferences and the Democratic Peace.” International Studies Quarterly 44 (2): 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartzke, Erik. 2001. “Democracy and the Preparation for War: Does Regime Type Affect States' Anticipation of Casualties?” International Studies Quarterly 45 (3): 467–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelpi, Christopher, Feaver, Peter D., and Reifler, Jason. 2005. “Success Matters: Casualty Sensitivity and the War in Iraq.” International Security 30 (3): 7–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Stacy B., and Segura, Gary M.. 1997. “Cross-National Variation in the Political Sophistication of Individuals: Capability or Choice?” Journal of Politics 59: 126–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann K., Richard, Tetlock, Philip E., and Visser, Penny S.. 1999. “Mass Public Decisions on Going to War: A Cognitive-Interactionist Framework.” The American Political Science Review 93 (3): 553–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J., and Nelson, Michael. 2003. “Anatomy of a Rally Effect: George W. Bush and the War on Terrorism.” PS: Political Science and Politics. 36 (1): 37–44.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary, and Kernell, Samuel. 2004. “The Logic of American Politics in Wartime.” In, The Logic of American Politics 2nd edition. ed. Kernell, Samuel and Jacobson, Gary C.. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1–49.Google Scholar
Kadera, Kelly M. 1998. “Transmission, Barriers and Constraints: A Dynamic Model of the Spread of War.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (3): 367–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadera, Kelly M., Crescenzi, Mark J., and Shannon, Megan. 2003. “Democratic Survival, Peace and War in the International System.” The American Journal of Political Science 47 (2): 224–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadera, Kelly M., and Sara McLaughlin, Mitchell. 2005. “Manna from Heaven or Forbidden Fruit? The(Ab) Use of Control Variables in Research on International Conflict.” Special Issue of Conflict Management and Peace Science 22 (4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kam, Cindy D. 2005. “Who Toes the Party Line? Cues, Values and Individual Differences.” Political Behavior 27 (2): 163–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karol, David, and Miguel, Edward. 2007. “Iraq War Casualties and the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election.” Journal of Politics 69 (3): 633–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 2002. “New Ideas in Experimental Political Science.” Political Analysis 10 (4): 319–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., Erickson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1992. “Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy.” The American Political Science Review 86 (3): 597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintz, Alex, Redd, Steve B., and Vedlitz, Arnold. 2006. “Can We Generalize from Student Experiments to the Real World in Political Science, Military Affairs, and International Relations?” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (5): 757–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, John E. 1973. War, Presidents and Public Opinion. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Murray, William S. 2001. “A Will to Measure.” Parameters XXXI (3): 134–47.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Stephen P., and Segura, Gary M.. 1999. “Midterm Elections and Divided Government: An Information-Driven Theory of Electoral Volatility.” Political Research Quarterly 52: 609–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nincic, D. J., and Nincic, M.. 1995. “Commitment to Military Interventions: the Democratic Government as an Economic Investor.” Journal of Peace Research 32: 413–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, Richard, and Ross, Lee. 1980. Human Inference: Strategies and Short Comings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Parker, Suzanne L. 1995. “Toward an Understanding of ‘Rally’ Effects: Public Opinion in the Persian Gulf War.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 59 (4): 526–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce. 1990. Controlling the Sword: The Democratic Governance of National Security. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. 2001. Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O. 1986. “College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influence of a Narrow Data Base on Social Psychology's View of Human Nature.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (3): 515–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shane, Scott. December 4. 2005. “Bush's Speech on Iraq War Echoes Voice of an Analyst.” The New York Times. 1: 1.Google Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, and Conover, Pamela Johnston. 1981. “The Dynamics of Presidential Support during International Conflict Situations; the Iranian Hostage Crisis.” Political Behavior 3 (4): 303–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siverson, Randolph. 1995. “Democracies and War Participation: In Defense of Institutional Constraints.” The European Journal of International Relations 1 (4): 481–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Patricia L. 2006. “Sustaining the Fight: A Cross-Sectional Time Series Analysis of Public Support for Ongoing Military Interventions.” Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Voeten, Erik, and Brewer, Paul R.. 2006. “Public Opinion, the War in Iraq and Presidential Accountability.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (6): 809–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.