Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T17:08:56.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moral and Criminal Responsibility in Plato's Laws

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2009

LORRAINE SMITH PANGLE
LORRAINE SMITH PANGLE*
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin
*
Lorraine Smith Pangle is Associate Professor of Government, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station A1800, Austin, TX 78712 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his most practical work, the Laws, Plato combines a frank statement of the radical Socratic thesis that virtue is knowledge and vice involuntary with a prudential acceptance of the political community's need for retributive punishment. This paper examines the Laws' statements of principle regarding responsibility and punishment and compares these with the actual criminal code proposed in Book 9. The result is to show how a radical philosophic insight can be adapted to make ordinary citizens more gentle, thoughtful, and humane without sapping their moral commitments. Lessons are drawn from the Laws for the contemporary restorative justice movement.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 103 , Issue 3 , August 2009 , pp. 456 - 473
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adkins, Arthur W. H. 1960. Merit and Responsibility: A Study in Greek Values. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Danielle. 2000. The World of Prometheus. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Nicomachean Ethics. Translations my own.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. 1936. The Essays of Francis Bacon. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Bobonich, Christopher. 2002. Plato's Utopia Recast. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonta, James, Jesseman, Rebecca, Rugge, Tanya, and Corimer, Robert. 2006. “Restorative Justice and Recidivism.” In Handbook of Restorative Justice: A Global Perspective, ed. Sullivan, Dennis and Tift, Larry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Booth, James. 1999. “Communities of Memory: On Identity, Memory, and Debt.” American Political Science Review 93: 249–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, James. 2001. “The Unforgotten: Memories of Justice.” American Political Science Review 95: 777–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, Mark. 1998. The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organizations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 1989. Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 2002. Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Jennifer Gerada. 1994. “The Use of Mediation to Resolve Criminal Cases: A Procedural Critique.” Emory Law Journal 43: 1247–309.Google Scholar
Cairns, Douglas L. 1993. Aidos: The Psychology and Ethics of Honor and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cobb, Sara. 1997. “The Domestication of Violence in Mediation.” Law and Society Review 31: 397–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coker, Donna. 1999. “Enhancing Autonomy for Battered Women: Lessons from Navajo Peacemaking.” UCLA Law Review 47: 1–111.Google Scholar
Daly, Kathleen. 2006. “The Limits of Restorative Justice.” In Handbook of Restorative Justice: A Global Perspective, ed. Sullivan, Dennis and Tift, Larry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Daly, Kathleen and Immarigeon, R.. 1998. “The Past, Present, and Future of Restorative Justice: Some Critical Reflections.” Contemporary Justice Review 1: 21–45.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1951. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
England, E. B. 1921. The Laws of Plato. 2 vols. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Gilligan, J. 1996. Violence: Our Deadly Epidemic and Its Causes. New York: Grosset/Putnam Books.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1989. Abortion and Divorce in Western Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar
Harris, Nathan, and Maruna, Shadd. 2006. “Shame, Shaming, and Restorative Justice. In Handbook of Restorative Justice: A Global Perspective, ed. Sullivan, Dennis and Tift, Larry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, M. M. 1981. Plato on Punishment. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massaro, T. M. 1997. “The Meaning of Shame: Implications for Legal Reform.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 3 (4): 645–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, Glenn. 1960. Plato's Cretan City: A Historical Interpretation of the Laws. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pangle, Thomas. 1976. “The Political Psychology of Religion in Plato's Laws. American Political Science Review 70 (4): 1059–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pangle, Thomas. 1980. The Laws of Plato. Translation with notes and interpretive essay. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Parker, Robert. 1983. Miasma: Pollution and Purification in Early Greek Religion. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Roberts, Jean. 1987. “Plato on the Causes of Wrongdoing in the Laws.” Ancient Philosophy 7: 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, Declan. 2003. Accountability and Restorative Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, Trevor. 1972. Notes on the Laws of Plato. London: Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Saunders, Trevor. 1991a. Plato's Penal Code: Tradition, Controversy, and Reform in Greek Penology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, Trevor. 1991b. “Penal Law and Family Law in Plato's Magnesia.” In Symposion 1990: Papers on Greek and Hellenistic Legal History, ed. Gagarin, M.. Cologne: Böhlau Verlag, 115–32.Google Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm. 2006. Plato: Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seneca, . 1995. “On Anger.” In Moral and Political Essays, ed. Cooper, John M. and Procopé, J. F.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1–116.Google Scholar
Stalley, R. F. 1983. An Introduction to Plato's Laws. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stalley, R. F. 1994. “Persuasion in Plato's Laws.” History of Political Thought, 15: 157–77.Google Scholar
Stauffer, Devin. 2001. Plato's Introduction to the Question of Justice. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Stauffer, Devin. 2006. The Unity of Plato's Gorgias. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strang, Heather. 2002. Repair or Revenge: Victims and Restorative Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1975. The Argument and Action of Plato's Laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Dennis, and Tifft, Larry. 2006. “Introduction” In Handbook of Restorative Justice: A Global Perspective, ed. Sullivan, Dennis and Tiff, Larry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tangney, June Price. 1995. “Recent Advances in the Empirical Study of Shame and Guilt.” American Behavioral Scientist 38: 1132–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Neely. 2007. “Juries Don't Always Know Heinous Crimes When They See Them, but This Might Help.” Washington Post, 23 July.Google Scholar
Umbreit, Mark, Coates, Robert, and Vos, Betty. 2006. “Victim Offender Mediation: An Evolving Evidence-Based Practice.” In Handbook of Restorative Justice: A Global Perspective, ed. Sullivan, Dennis and Tift, Larry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Ness, D. 1993. “New Wine in Old Wineskins: Four Challenges of Restorative Justice.” Criminal Law Forum 4: 251–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Roslyn. 2006. The Socratic Paradox and Its Enemies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Yazzie, Robert. 1998. “Navaho Peacemaking: Implications for Adjudication-Based Systems of Justice.” Contemporary Justice Review 1 (1): 123–31.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.