Hostname: page-component-6dbcb7884d-cm8hq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T22:29:13.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Method of Estimating the Personal Ideology of Political Representatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Richard T. Carson  and
Joe A. Oppenheimer
Richard T. Carson
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Joe A. Oppenheimer
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We suggest a method for estimating a political representative's personal ideology and its effect on his or her voting decisions. The current practice of using the ratings of a pressure group such as Americans for Democratic Action (ADA) as a proxy for personal ideology is shown to have a number of theoretical and interpretive flaws. Our technique uses the residuals from two regression equations to provide answers to two questions: Is there a systematic ideological component to the voting behavior of political representatives after taking account of other political determinants, and if a systematic ideological component exists, is it possible to determine its role in voting on particular issues? The technique developed and the currently accepted practice are compared using votes on labor issues as an empirical example.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 78 , Issue 1 , March 1984 , pp. 163 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barone, M., Ujifusa, G., & Matthews, D.The almanac of American politics. Boston: Gambit, 1970, 1972, 1974; New York: Dutton, 1976, 1978, 1980 and 1982.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. A., & Horn, S. R.Explaining House voting on energy policy: ideology and the conditional effects of party and district economic interests. Western Political Quarterly, 1981, 34, 235–245.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, G.Education, income, ability revisited. Journal of Econometrics, 1977, 5, 241–254.Google Scholar
Chappell, H. W. Jr.Campaign contributions and voting on the cargo preference bill: a comparison of simultaneous models. Public Choice, 1981, 36, 301–312. (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, H. W. Jr.Conflict of interest and congressional voting: a note. Public Choice, 1981, 37, 331–336. (b)Google Scholar
Downs, A. J.An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row, 1957.Google Scholar
Dunlop, R.E., & Allen, M.P.Partisan differences on environmental issues: a congressional roll-call analysis. Western Political Quarterly, 1976, 29, 384–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, M.P.Comments. In Russell, C. S. (Ed.), Collective decision making. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press (for Resources for the Future), 1979.Google Scholar
Goldberger, A. S.Econometric theory. New York: Wiley, 1964.Google Scholar
Hanushek, E.A., & Jackson, J.E.Statistical methods for social scientists. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Johannes, J.R., & McAdams, J.C.The congressional incumbency effect: is it casework, policy compatibility, or something else? an examination of the 1978 election. American Journal of Political Science, 1981, 25, 512–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, G.G.et al.The theory and practice of econometrics. New York: Wiley, 1980.Google Scholar
Judge, G.G.et al.An introduction to the theory and practice of econometrics. New York: John Wiley, 1982.Google Scholar
Kalt, J. P.The economics and politics of oil price regulation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Kalt, J. P.Oil and ideology in the U.S. Senate. The Energy Journal, 1982, 3, 141–166.Google Scholar
Kau, J. B., Keenan, D., & Rubin, P. H.A general equilibrium model of congressional voting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1982, 271–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kau, J. B. & Rubin, P. H.Voting on minimum wages: a time-series analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 1978, 86, 337–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kau, J. B., & Rubin, P. H.Self-interest, ideology, and logrolling in congressional voting. The Journal of Law and Economics, 1979, 22, 365–384. (a)Google Scholar
Kau, J. B., & Rubin, P. H.Public interest lobbies: membership and influence. Public Choice, 1979, 34, 45–54. (b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenski, H.C., & Kenski, M.C.Partisanship, ideology, and constituency differences on environmental issues in the U.S. House of Representatives: 1973-78. Policy Studies Journal, 1980, 9, 325–335.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W.Models of legislative voting. The Journal of Politics, 1977, 39, 563–595.Google Scholar
Kushner, H. W.Electoral margins and ideological voting. Review of Public Data Use, 1975, 3, 23–27.Google Scholar
Lindgrem, B.W., & McElrath, G.W.Introduction to probability and statistics, 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan, 1969.Google Scholar
Lopreato, S.C., & Smoller, F.Explaining energy votes in the ninety-fourth Congress. Center for Energy Studies, The University of Texas at Austin, Policy Study No. 1, 1978.Google Scholar
MacRae, D.Issues and parties in legislative voting: methods of statistical analysis. New York: Harper and Row, 1970.Google Scholar
Markus, G.B.Electoral coalitions and Senate roll call behavior: an ecological analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 1974, 18, 595–607.Google Scholar
Matthews, D.U.S. senators and their world. Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Mayhew, D. R.The electoral connection. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, J. A.Some political implications of “vote trading and the voting paradox: a proof of logical equivalence.” American Political Science Review, 1975, 69, 963–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer, J. A., Mitchell, R. C., & Carson, R.Explaining congressional environmental voting. 1984, unpublished.Google Scholar
Poole, K. T.Dimensions of interest group evaluation of the U.S. Senate,1969-1978. American Journal of Political Science, 1981, 25, 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridker, R.G., & Henning, J.A.The determinants of residential property values with special reference to air pollution. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1967, 49, 246–257.Google Scholar
Shreck, A.E.Minerals yearbook: 1975. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Washington, D.C., 1977.Google Scholar
Silberman, J.I., & Durden, G.C.Determining legislative preferences on the minimum wage: an economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 1976, 84, 317–329.Google Scholar
Weisberg, H. F.Evaluating theories of congressional roll-call voting. American Journal of Political Science, 1978, 22,554–557.Google Scholar
Wittman, D.Candidates with policy preferences: a dynamic model. Journal of Economic Theory, 1977, 14, 180–189.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.