Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T12:14:36.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making the City Safe for Philosophy: Nicomachean Ethics, Book 10

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Aristide Tessitore
Aristide Tessitore*
Affiliation:
Assumption College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The perennially problematic relationship between philosophy and politics, though recognized as an important theme in the Platonic corpus, is virtually ignored in the writings of his most famous student. This is not due to the absence of the problem but the deftness of Aristotle's treatment. Attentiveness to both the requirements of moral-political life and the nature of philosophy gives rise to the rhetorical design of the Nicomachean Ethics. In the final book of the Ethics Aristotle establishes the value of philosophy by placing his argument within a broader context that reveals to what extent moral and intellectual excellence can be regarded as similar and even complementary. Without actually denying the existence of a fundamental tension between the requirements of philosophy and civic virtue, Aristotle succeeds in winning an at-least-partial acceptance of philosophy on the part of those who are (or will be) most responsible for the welfare of the city.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 84 , Issue 4 , December 1990 , pp. 1251 - 1262
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackrill, J. L. 1980. “Aristotle on Eudaimonia.” In Essays on Aristotle's Ethics, ed. Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Arnhart, Larry. 1981. Aristotle on Political Reasoning. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University.Google Scholar
Clark, Stephen. 1975. Aristotle's Man. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, John. 1975. Reason and Human Good in Aristotle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, John. 1989. “Contemplation and Happiness: A Reconsideration.” In Moral Philosophy: Historical and Contemporary Essays, eds. Starr, William and Taylor, Richard. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Faulkner, Robert. 1972. “Spontaneity, Justice, and Coercion: On Nicomachean Ethics Books III and IV.” In Coercion, ed. Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W.. Nomos, vol. 14. Chicago: Aldine/Atherton.Google Scholar
Festugière, André J. 1960. Aristote: Le plaisir. Paris: Librairie Philosophique.Google Scholar
Gauthier, Réné, and Jolif, Jean. 1970. Alistote: L'ethique a Nicomaque. 2 vols. Louvain: Publications Universitaires.Google Scholar
Hardie, William F. R. 1968. Aristotle's Ethical Theory. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, William F. R. 1979. “Aristotle on the Best Life for Man.” Philosophy 54:35–50.Google Scholar
Jaffa, Harry V. 1952. Thomism and Aristotelianism. Westport: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Lieberg, Godo. 1958. Die Lehre von der Lust in den Ethiken des Aristoteles. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Lord, Carnes. 1982. Education and Culture in the Political Thought of Aristotle. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mara, Gerald. 1987. “The Role of Philosophy in Aristotle's Political Science.” Polity 19:375–401.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1972. “Aristotle on Eudaimonia.” Phronesis 17:252–59.Google Scholar
Nichols, Mary. 1987. “Aristotle's Defense of Rhetoric.” Journal of Politics 49:657–77.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. 1978. “Aristotelian Pleasures.” In Ethics and Politics, vol. 2 of Articles on Aristotle, eds. Barnes, Jonathan, Schofield, Malcolm, and Sorabji, Richard. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Rodier, Georges. 1957. Etudes de philosophie grecque. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg. 1980. “The Place of Contemplation in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics.” In Essays on Aristotle's Ethics, ed. Oksenberg Rorty, Amélie. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Ross, William D. 1974. Aristotle. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
de Sainte Croix, Geoffrey E. M. 1972. The Origins of the Peloponnesian War. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1953. Natural Right and History. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1977. The City and Man. Chicago: Midway.Google Scholar
Tessitore, Aristide. 1989. “A Political Reading of Aristotle's Treatment of Pleasure in the Nicomachean Ethics.” Political Theory 17:247–65.Google Scholar
Urmson, J. O. 1988. Aristotle's Ethics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wilkes, Kathleen. 1978. “The Good Man and the Good for Man in Aristotle's Ethics.” Mind 87:553–71.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.