Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T05:39:40.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Machiavellian Democracy: Controlling Elites with Ferocious Populism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2005

John P. McCormick
Affiliation:
John P. McCormick is Assistant Professor of Political Science, Yale University, P.O. Box 208301, New Haven, CT 06520-8301 ([email protected]),,

Abstract

This essay demonstrates that Niccolò Machiavelli’s political thought addresses the deficiencies of two opposite poles of contemporary democratic theory: As do formal or minimalist approaches, he specifies electoral mechanisms for elite control; and similar to substantive or civic culture approaches, he encourages more direct and robust modes of popular participation. On these grounds, I cull from Machiavelli’s Discourses a theory of democracy in which the populace selects the elites who will hold office but also constantly patrols them through extraelectoral institutions and practices, such as the tribunes of the people, public accusations, and popular appeals. Machiavelli adds to these institutional features of popular government an important cultural dimension: The people should despise and mistrust elites, and they should actively confront the injustice that elite governing inevitably entails. Finally, I explore the ramifications of this theory for debates over elite accountability in contemporary democratic theory.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2001 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.