Hostname: page-component-5f56664f6-p8hl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-07T06:32:37.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Logic of Kidnapping in Civil War: Evidence from Colombia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2022

DANIELLE GILBERT Open the ORCID record for DANIELLE GILBERT [Opens in a new window]
DANIELLE GILBERT*
Affiliation:
United States Air Force Academy, United States
*
Danielle Gilbert, Assistant Professor, Department of Military and Strategic Studies, United States Air Force Academy, United States, [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Why do some armed groups kidnap for ransom? Despite a dramatic spike in kidnappings by political groups over the last several decades, there are scant existing explanations for why groups use this tool of coercion. Leveraging evidence from extensive interviews with former combatants from Colombia’s civil war, including the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and National Liberation Army (ELN), as well as military and security personnel, I show that ransom kidnapping is used to enforce groups’ protection rackets, their main source of funding. Kidnapping is both the most lucrative way to punish tax evasion and an effective means of deterring future shirking. Thus, groups that tax local populations are more likely to kidnap; groups relying on external or voluntary forms of funding are less likely to take hostages. This article explains when we should see kidnapping in armed conflict, describing an underexplored way that selective violence bolsters insurgency.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 116 , Issue 4 , November 2022 , pp. 1226 - 1241
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adamson, Fiona. 2005. “Globalisation, Transnational Political Mobilisation, and Networks of Violence.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 18 (1): 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arjona, Ana. 2016. Rebelocracy: Social Order in the Colombian Civil War. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asal, Victor, Rethemeyer, R. Karl, and Schoon, Eric W.. 2019. “Crime, Conflict, and the Legitimacy Trade-Off: Explaining Variation in Insurgents’ Participation in Crime.” The Journal of Politics 81 (2): 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and George, Alexander L.. 1997. Process Tracing in Case Study Research. Washington, DC: MacArthur Program on Case Studies.Google Scholar
Blattman, Chris. 2009. “From Violence to Voting: War and Political Participation in Uganda.” American Political Science Review 103 (2): 231–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breslawski, Jori, and Tucker, Colin. 2021. “Ideological Motives and Taxation by Armed Groups.” Conflict Management and Peace Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/07388942211033229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byman, Daniel. 2005. Deadly Connections: States that Sponsor Terrorism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callimachi, Rukmini. 2014. “Paying Ransoms, Europe Bankrolls Qaeda Terror.” The New York Times, July 29.Google Scholar
Centro Nacional CNMH. 2013a. “Una verdad secuestrada: Cuarenta anos de estadísticas de secuestro 1970–2010.” Technical Report. Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica Impreso en Colombia (CNMH).Google Scholar
Centro Nacional CNMH. 2013b. “Una sociedad secuestrada.” Technical Report. Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica Impreso en Colombia (CNMH).Google Scholar
Cohen, Dara Kay. 2016. Rape During Civil War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, David. 2012. “Remarks of Under Secretary David Cohen at Chatham House on ‘Kidnapping for Ransom: The Growing Terrorist Financing Challenge.” U.S. Department of the Treasury. https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/pages/tg1726.aspx.Google Scholar
Collier, Paul, and Hoeffler, Anke. 2004. “Greed and Grievance in Civil War.” Oxford Economic Papers 56 (4): 563–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, Sarah Zukerman. 2016. Organized Violence after Civil War: The Geography of Recruitment in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danton, José Antonio Gutiérrez. 2018. “Insurgent Institutions: Refractory Communities, Armed Insurgency and Institution.” PhD diss. University College Dublin.Google Scholar
Downes, Alexander. 2008. Targeting Civilians in War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Drake, Charles. 1998. “The Role of Ideology in Terrorists’ Target Selection.” Terrorism and Political Violence 10 (2): 53–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Tiempo . 2008. “Marcha contra las Farc, mayor movilización en la historia del país.” El Tiempo, February 4.Google Scholar
Fattal, Alex. 2014. “Hostile Remixes on Youtube: A New Constraint on Pro-FARC Counterpublics in Colombia.” American Ethnologist 41 (2): 320–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fattal, Alex. 2018. Guerrilla Marketing: Counterinsurgency and Capitalism in Colombia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felbab-Brown, Vanda. 2009. Shooting Up: Counterinsurgency and the War on Drugs. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Forest, James. 2012a. “Global Trends in Kidnapping by Terrorist Groups.” Global Change, Peace & Security 24 (3): 311–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forest, James. 2012b. “Kidnapping by Terrorist Groups, 1970-2010: Is Ideological Orientation Relevant?” Crime & Delinquency 58 (5): 769–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Lee Ann. 2017. Interviewing in Social Science Research: A Relational Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gallego, Gloria. 2019. Después vino el silencio: memorias del secuestro en Antioquia. Medellín: Universidad EAFIT: Museo Casa de la Memoria de Medellín.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Danielle. 2020a. “The Oxygen of Publicity: Explaining U.S. Media Coverage of International Kidnapping.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2020.1792723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Danielle. 2020b. “The Logic of Coercive Kidnapping.” PhD diss. The George Washington University.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Danielle. 2022. “Replication Data for: The Logic of Kidnapping in Civil War: Evidence from Colombia.” Harvard Dataverse. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/50M5Z4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Sanín, Francisco, and Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2014. “Ideology in Civil War: Instrumental Adoption and Beyond.” Journal of Peace Research 51 (2): 213–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Sanín, Francisco, and Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2017. “What Should We Mean by ‘Pattern of Political Violence?’ Repertoire, Targeting, Frequency, and Technique.” Perspectives on Politics 15 (1): 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover Green, Amelia. 2018. The Commander’s Dilemma: Violence and Restraint in Wartime. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisa, Hultman. 2007. “Battle Losses and Rebel Violence: Raising the Costs for Fighting.” Terrorism and Political Violence 19 (2): 205–22.Google Scholar
Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz (JEP). 2021. Caso no. 01. Toma de rehenes y graves privaciones de la libertad cometidas por las FARC-EP. Technical report. Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis, and Balcells, Laia. 2010 “International System and Technologies of Rebellion: How the End of the Cold War Shaped Internal Conflict.” American Political Science Review 104 (3): 415–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Margaret. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Loertscher, Seth, and Milton, Daniel. 2018. “Prisoners and Politics: Western Hostage Taking by Militant Groups.” Democracy and Security 14 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mampilly, Zachariah. 2011. Rebel Rulers: Insurgent Governance and Civilian Life during War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mampilly, Zachariah. 2021. “Rebel Taxation: Between the Moral and Market Economy.” Chap. 4 in Rebel Economies: Warlords, Insurgents, Humanitarians, eds. Di Cosmo, Nicola, Fassin, Didier, and Pinaud, Clémence. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mampilly, Zachariah, and Thakur, Shalaka. 2021. “Rebel Taxation as Extortion or a Technology of Governance: Telling the Difference in India’s Northeast.” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Marighella, Carlos. 1969. Minimanual of the Urban Guerrilla. Utrecht, NL: Foreign Languages Press.Google Scholar
Moncada, Eduardo. 2019. “Resisting Protection: Rackets, Resistance, and State Building.” Comparative Politics 510 (3): 321–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarrete, Tatiana, Evans, Michael, and Restrepo, Juan Diego. 2017. “Chiquita Papers Document over $800,000 in Payments to Colombian Guerrillas.” Technical Report, National Security Archive. https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/colombia-chiquita-papers/2017-05-11/chiquita-papers-document-over-800000-payments-colombian-guerrillas.Google Scholar
North, Douglass. 1985. “Transaction Costs in History.” Journal of European Economic History 14 (3): 557–76.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1993. “Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development.” American Political Science Review 87 (3): 567–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, Ben, Steele, Abbey, Vargas, Juan, and Weintraub, Michael. 2015. “True Believers, Deserters, and Traitors: Who Leaves Insurgent Groups and Why.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 59 (5): 794–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otis, John. 2014. The FARC and Colombia’s Illegal Drug Trade. Technical report. Washington, DC: The Wilson Center.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Sarah, and Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2015. “Transparency in Intensive Research on Violence: Ethical Dilemmas and Unforeseen Consequences.” Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 13 (1): 22–27.Google Scholar
Rettberg, Angelika, and Ortiz-Riomalo, Juan Felipe. 2016. “Golden Opportunity, or a New Twist on the Resource–Conflict Relationship: Links between the Drug Trade and Illegal Gold Mining in Colombia.” World Development 84 (August): 82–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rettberg, Angelika, Nasi, Carlo, Leiteritz, Ralf, and Sanabria, Juan Diego Prieto. 2019. Different Resources, Different Conflicts? The Subnational Political Economy of Armed Conflict and Crime in Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: Ediciones Uniandes-Universidad de los Andes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revkin, Mara Redlich. 2020. “What Explains Taxation by Resource-Rich Rebels? Evidence from the Islamic State in Syria.” Journal of Politics 82 (2): 757–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC). 2000. “Ley 2000: Sobre la tributación.” https://cedema.org/digital_items/4349.Google Scholar
Nazih, Richani. 2013. Systems of Violence: The Political Economy of War and Peace in Colombia. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Sophie, Richardot. 2014. “‘You Know What to Do with Them’: The Formulation of Orders and Engagement in War Crimes.” Aggression and Violent Behavior 19 (2): 83–90.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Franco, Diana. 2016. “Internal Wars, Taxation, and State Building.” American Sociological Review 81 (1): 190–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Michael. 1999. “The Political Economy of the Resource Curse.” World Politics 51 (2): 297–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabates-Wheeler, Rachel, and Verwimp, Philip. 2014. “Extortion with Protection: Understanding the Effect of Rebel Taxation on Civilian Welfare in Burundi.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 58 (8): 1474–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas. 1966. Arms and Influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas. 1968. “The Life You Save May Be Your Own.” In Problems in Public Expenditure Analysis, ed. Chase, Samuel B., 127–62. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Semana. 2020. “‘Fue un gravísimo error’: Farc pide perdón a víctimas de secuestros.” Semana, September 14.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Jacob. 2013. The Terrorist’s Dilemma: Managing Violent Covert Organizations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shortland, Anja. 2019. Kidnap: Inside the Ransom Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, Abbey. 2017. Democracy and Displacement in Colombia’s Civil War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Megan. 2018. “Civil War as State-Making: Strategic Governance in Civil War.” International Organization 72 (1): 205–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Christopher. 2014. “The (In)Effectiveness of Torture for Combatting Insurgency.” Journal of Peace Research 51 (3): 388–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, Kai. 2012. “Ideology and Violence in Civil Wars: Theory and Evidence from Mozambique and Angola.” Civil Wars 14 (4): 546–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1985. “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime.” Chap. 5 in Violence: A Reader, eds. Evans, Peter B., Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Valentino, Benjamin. 2014. “Why We Kill: The Political Science of Political Violence against Civilians.” Annual Review of Political Science 17: 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Barbara. 2009. “Bargaining Failures and Civil War.” Annual Review of Political Science, 12: 243–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, Jeremy. 2007. Inside Rebellion: The Political Economy of Rebel Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Charles, Gibson, Chris, Ribeiro, Ludmila, and Hamsho-Diaz, Paula. 2010. “Crime Victimization in Latin America and Intentions to Migrate to the United States.” International Migration Review 44 (1): 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2008. “Sexual Violence during War: Toward an Understanding of Variation.” In Order, Conflict, and Violence, eds. Kalyvas, Stathis N., Shapiro, Ian, and Masoud, Tarek, 321–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2009. “Armed Groups and Sexual Violence: When Is Wartime Rape Rare?” Politics and Society 37 (1): 131–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2018. “Rape as a Practice of War: Toward a Typology of Political Violence.” Politics & Society 46 (4): 513–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Gilbert Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/50M5Z4
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Gilbert supplementary material

Appendix

Download Gilbert supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 383.2 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.