Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
McGuire, Kevin T.
and
Palmer, Barbara
1996.
Issues, Agendas, and Decision Making on the Supreme Court.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 90,
Issue. 4,
p.
853.
Epstein, Lee
Segal, Jeffrey A.
and
Johnson, Timothy
1996.
The Claim of Issue Creation on the U.S. Supreme Court.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 90,
Issue. 4,
p.
845.
Spriggs, James F.
and
Wahlbeck, Paul J.
1997.
Amicus Curiae and the Role of Information at the Supreme Court.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 2,
p.
365.
WAHLBECK, PAUL J.
SPRIGGS, JAMES F.
and
MALTZMAN, FORREST
1999.
The Politics of Dissents and Concurrences on the U.S. Supreme Court.
American Politics Quarterly,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 4,
p.
488.
Palmer, Barbara
1999.
Issue Definition and Policy Making on the United States Supreme Court.
Southeastern Political Review,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 4,
p.
699.
Palmer, Barbara
1999.
Issue Fluidity and Agenda Setting on the Warren Court.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 1,
p.
39.
JOHNSON, TIMOTHY R.
2001.
Information, Oral Arguments, and Supreme Court Decision Making.
American Politics Research,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 4,
p.
331.
Benesh, Sara C.
Brenner, Saul
and
Spaeth, Harold J.
2002.
Aggressive Grants by Affirm-Minded Justices.
American Politics Research,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 3,
p.
219.
Spriggs, James F.
and
Hansford, Thomas G.
2002.
The U.S. Supreme Court's Incorporation and Interpretation of Precedent.
Law & Society Review,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 1,
p.
139.
Chen, Paul
2003.
The Institutional Sources of State Success in Federalism Litigation before the Supreme Court.
Law & Policy,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 4,
p.
455.
Epstein, Lee
2004.
Introduction to the Symposium.
Perspectives on Politics,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 04,
p.
757.
Sherry, Suzanna
2004.
What's Law Got to Do with It?.
Perspectives on Politics,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 04,
p.
769.
Silbey, Susan S.
2004.
The Dream of a Social Science: Supreme Court Forecasting, Legal Culture, and the Public Sphere.
Perspectives on Politics,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 04,
p.
785.
Caldeira, Gregory A.
2004.
Expert Judgment versus Statistical Models: Explanation versus Prediction.
Perspectives on Politics,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 04,
p.
777.
Martin, Andrew D.
Quinn, Kevin M.
Ruger, Theodore W.
and
Kim, Pauline T.
2004.
Competing Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decision Making.
Perspectives on Politics,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 04,
p.
761.
Greenhouse, Linda
2004.
Press Room Predictions.
Perspectives on Politics,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 04,
p.
781.
Maltzman, Forrest
and
Wahlbeck, Paul J.
2004.
A Conditional Model of Opinion Assignment on the Supreme Court.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 4,
p.
551.
Collins, Paul M.
2004.
Friends of the Court: Examining the Influence of Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation.
Law & Society Review,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 4,
p.
807.
Johnson, Timothy R.
Spriggs, James F.
and
Wahlbeck, Paul J.
2005.
Passing and Strategic Voting on the U.S. Supreme Court.
Law & Society Review,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 2,
p.
349.
HURWITZ, MARK S.
2006.
Institutional Arrangements and the Dynamics of Agenda Formation in the U.S. Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals.
Law & Policy,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 3,
p.
321.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.