Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-04T23:31:39.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpretation and the History of Political Theory: Apology and Epistemology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1982

John G. Gunnell
John G. Gunnell*
Affiliation:
Slate University of New York at Albany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent challenges to traditional approaches and purposes for studying the history of political theory have raised questions about its constitution as both a subject matter and subfield of political science. Methodological arguments advocating what is characterized as a more truly historical mode of inquiry for understanding political ideas and recovering textual meaning have become increasingly popular. The relationship of these hermeneutical claims about historicity, such as that advanced by Quentin Skinner, to the actual practice of interpretation is problematical. Such claims are more a defense of a certain norm of historical investigation than a method of interpretation, and the implications of this norm for the reconstitution of the history of political theory require careful consideration.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , June 1982 , pp. 317 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dunn, John. 1968. The identity of the history of ideas. Philosophy 43: 85–116.10.1017/S0031819100008986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, H-G. 1976. Philosophical hermeneutics. Berkely: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H-G. 1975. Truth and method. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John G. 1981a. Encounters of the third kind: the alienation of theory in American political science. American Journal of Political Science 25: 440–61.10.2307/2110813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnell, John G. 1981b. Political theory and the theory of action. Western Political Quarterly 34: 341–58.10.1177/106591298103400303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnell, John G. 1980. Method, methodology, and the search for traditions in the history of political theory. Annals of Scholarship 1: 26–56.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John G. 1979. Political theory: tradition and interpretation. Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. D. Jr. 1976. The aims of interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. D. Jr. 1967. Validity in interpretation. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hollis, Martin. 1977. Models of man. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1971. Politics, language and time: essays on political thought and history. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1976. Interpretation theory, discourse, and the surplus of meaning. Forth Worth: Texas Christian University Press.Google Scholar
Schocket, Gordon. 1974. Quentin Skinner's method. Political Theory 2: 261–76.10.1177/009059177400200302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1979. The idea of a cultural lexicon. Essays in Criticism 29: 205–23.10.1093/eic/XXIX.3.205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1978a. Action and context. The Aristotelian Society. Supplementary vol. 52: 55–69.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1978b. The foundations of modern political thought, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1977. Political Language and the Explanation of Political Action. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 1977, in Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1976. Review of Handbook of Political Science, vol. 1, eds. Greenstein, Fred and Polsby, Nelson. Political Theory.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1975–1976. Hermeneutics and the role of history. New Literary History 7: 209–32.10.2307/468286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1974. Some problems in the analysis of political thought and action. Political Theory 2: 277–303.10.1177/009059177400200303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1972a. Motives, intentions, and the interpretation of texts. New Literary History 3: 393–408.10.2307/468322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1972b. ‘Social meaning’ and the explanation of social action. In Philosophy, politics and society, series 4, pp. 136–57. eds. Laslett, Peter, Runciman, W. G., and Skinner, Quentin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1971. On performing and explaining linguistic actions. The Philosophical Quarterly 21: 1–21.10.2307/2217566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1970. Conventions and the understanding of speech acts. The Philosophical Quarterly 20: 118–38.10.2307/2218084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1969. Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. History and Theory 8: 3–53.10.2307/2504188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1966. The limits of historical explanation. Philosophy 41: 199–215.10.1017/S003181910005868XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.