Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T03:37:21.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influences on Executive and Congressional Budgetary Priorities, 1955–1981

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Mark S. Kamlet
Affiliation:
Carnegie-Mellon University
David C. Mowery
Affiliation:
Carnegie-Mellon University

Abstract

A reduced form equation system is used to analyze the influence of economic, political, and institutional influences on the budgetary priorities of the executive branch and Congress during fiscal 1955–81. Three related issues are considered: the extent to which political and macroeconomic factors affect priorities; the degree of interdependence among the components of the federal budget and between spending and revenues; and differences between the executive branch and Congress with respect to these issues. Both types of interdependence are present within both executive branch and congressional budgeting, although this interdependence is stronger within the executive branch. The influence of economic conditions on budgetary outcomes is strong but varies considerably across spending categories. There is no evidence of apolitical business cycle. Political variables exert a modest influence on the budgetary outcomes examined; differences between Democratic and Republican budgetary policies, as well as differences in the budgetary priorities of different presidential administrations, are small by comparison with the differences between executive and congressional policies.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alt, James E., and Chrystal, Kenneth A.. 1983. Political Economics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Auten, Gerald, Bozeman, Barry, and Cline, Robert. 1984. A Sequential Model of Congressional Appropriations. American Journal of Political Science 28:503–24.Google Scholar
Azar, Edward E., and Havener, T. N.. 1976. Discontinuities in the Symbolic Environment: A Problem in Scaling. International Interactions 2:231–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Robert E., and Richardson, J. David. 1984. Recent U.S. Trade Policy and Its Global Implications. Working paper No. 1330. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel. 1982. Parties, Administrations, and American Macroeconomic Outlays. American Political Science Review 76:8393.Google Scholar
Berry, William D. 1985. The “Ratio Variable” Problem in Research on Budgeting and Expenditure Choke. Photocopy.Google Scholar
Browning, Robert X. 1984. Presidents, Congress, and Policy Outcomes: U.S. Social Welfare Expenditures, 1949–1977. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M., and Wagner, Richard E.. 1977. Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, David R. 1978. The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis. American Political Science Review 72:1243–61.Google Scholar
Chappell, Henry W. Jr., and Keech, William R.. ity and Macroeconomic Performance: Are Voters Really So Naive? Review of Economics and Statistics 65:385–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Henry W. Jr. and Keech, William R.. 1985. A New View of Political Accountability for Economic Performance. American Political Science Review 79:1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crecine, John P., Kamlet, Mark S., Mowery, David C., and Winer, Mark. 1981. The Role of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget in Executive Branch Budgetary Decision Making. In Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management. Vol. 2, ed., Crecine, J. P.. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Cusack, Thomas R., and Ward, Michael. 1981. Military Spending in the United States, Soviet Union, and People's Republic of China. Journal of Conflict Resolution 25:429–69.Google Scholar
Domke, William K., Eichenberg, Richard C., and Kelleher, Catherine M.. 1983. The Illusion of Choice: Defense and Welfare in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1948–1978. American Political Science Review 77:1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John A. 1974. Pork Barrel Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1978. Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Gregory W., and Crecine, John P.. 1981. Defense Spending, Nondefense Spending, and the Need for Fiscal Restraint: Two Models of the Presidential Budgetary Process. Arms Control 2:65106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Gregory W., and Kamlet, Mark S.. 1984. Explaining Presidential Priorities: The Competing Aspirations Levels of Macro budgetary Decision Making. American Political Science Review 78:356–71.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno S., and Schneider, Friedrich. 1978a. An Empirical Study of Politico-Economic Interactions in the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics 60:174–83.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno S., and Schneider, Friedrich. 1979. An Politico-Economic Model of the United Kingdom. Economic Journal 88:243–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. and Schneider, Friedrich. 1979. An Econometric Model with an Endogenous Government Sector. Public Choice 34:2943.Google Scholar
Golden, David, and Poterba, James M.. 1980. The Price of Popularity: The Political Business Cycle Reexamined. American Journal of Political Science 24:697714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Kjell, and Lagerkranz, Johan. 1977. Neither Tension nor Detente: East-West Relations in Europe, 1971–1975. Cooperation and Conflict 12:251–64.Google Scholar
Glejser, Henri. 1969. A New Test for Heteroskedasticity. Journal of the American Statistical Association 64:316–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heclo, Hugh. 1985. Executive Budget Making. In Federal Budget Policy in the 1980s, ed. Mills, G. B. and Palmer, J. L.. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas. 1977. Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy. American Political Science Review 71:1467–87.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas. 1979. Letter. American Political Science Review 73:180–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Alexander. 1984. Elections, Keynes, Bureaucracy, and Class. American Sociological Review 49:165–82.Google Scholar
Howell, Llewellyn D. 1983. A Comparative Study of the WEIS and COPDAB Data Sets. International Studies Quarterly 27:149–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, George, Griffiths, William E., Hill, R. Carter, Lutkepohl, Helmut, and Lee, Tsoung-chao. 1985. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2d ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Kamlet, Mark S., and Mowery, David C.. 1983. Budgetary Side Payments and Government Growth, 1953–68. American Journal of Political Science 27:636–64.Google Scholar
Kamlet, Mark S., and Mowery, David C., 1985a. The First Decade of the Congressional Budget Act: Legislative Imitation and Adaptation in Budgeting. Policy Sciences 18:313–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamlet, Mark S., and Mowery, David C.. 1985b. Economic, Political, and Institutional Influences on Executive and Congressional Budgetary Priorities, 1953–81. Carnegie-Mellon University. Photocopy.Google Scholar
Kamlet, Mark S. and Mowery, David C.. 1986. Does Tax Policy Respond to Spending Pressure? An Analysis of the Relationship between Budget and Revenue Policies, 1953–85. Carnegie-Mellon University. Photocopy.Google Scholar
Kamlet, Mark S., Mowery, David C., and Su, Tsai-tsu. 1986. Who Do You Trust? An Analysis of Executive and Congressional Executive Forecasts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1985a. Agenda Power in the Federal Appropriations Process: The Role of Reversionary Expenditure Levels. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1985b. Appropriations Decisions as a Bilateral Bargaining Game between President and Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 10:181201.Google Scholar
LeLoup, Lance T. 1978. Discretion in National Budgeting: Controlling the Controllables. Policy Analysis 4(4):455–75.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1986. Comparative Economic Voting: Britain, France, Germany, Italy. American Journal of Political Science 30:315–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, David. 1985. The Keynesian and Political Determinants of Unbalanced Budgets: U.S. Fiscal Policy From Eisenhower to Reagan. American Journal of Political Science 29:428–60.Google Scholar
Lowery, David, and Berry, William D.. 1983. The Growth of Government in the United States: An Empirical Assessment of Competing Explanations. American Journal of Political Science 27:665–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, G. Duncan. 1977. A Political Model of the Business Cycle. Journal of Political Economy 85:239–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, Charles A. 1983. Let the User Beware. International Studies Quarterly 27:169–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew D. 1983. Policy Components of Arms Competition. American Journal of Political Science 27:385406.Google Scholar
Moll, Kendall D., and Luebbert, Gregory M.. 1980. Arms Race and Military Expenditure Models: A Review. Journal of Conflict Resolution 24:153–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowery, David C., Kamlet, Mark S., and Crecine, John P.. 1980. Presidential Management of Budgetary and Fiscal Policymaking. Political Science Quarterly 95:395425.Google Scholar
Mullineaux, Donald J. 1980. Inflation Expectations and Money Growth in the United States. American Economic Review 70:149–61.Google Scholar
Niskanen, William. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Niskanen, William. 1975. Bureaucrats and Politicians. Journal of Law and Economics 18:617–43.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William. 1975. The Political Business Cycle. Review of Economic Studies 42:169–90.Google Scholar
Pack, Janet R. 1985. The Political Policy Cycle: Presidential Effort vs. Presidential Control. University of Pennsylvania. Typescript.Google Scholar
Padgett, John. 1981. Hierarchy and Ecological Control in Federal Budgetary Research. American Journal of Sociology 87:75129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pindyck, Robert S., and Rubinfeld, Daniel L.. 1982. Econometric Models and Economic Forecasting, 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith, and Daniels, R. Steven. 1985. Ideology, Party, and Voting in the U.S. Congress, 1959–1980. American Political Science Review 79:373–99.Google Scholar
Price, Robert W. 1978. Public Expenditure. In British Economic Policy 1960–1974, ed. Blackaby, F.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce. 1982. Defense Expenditures and National Well-Being. American Political Science Review 76:767–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, Allen. 1977. Congressional Control of Expenditures. Report to the House Budget Committee. 95th Cong., 1st sess. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Schick, Allen. 1985. The Budget as an Instrument of Presidential Policy. In The Reagan Presidency and the Governing of America, ed. Salamon, Lester M. and Lund, Michael S.. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1983. The Failure of Congressional Budgeting. Society, May/June.Google Scholar
Smyth, David J. 1970. The Full Employment Budget Surplus: Is It a Useful Policy Guide? Public Policy 18(2):289300.Google Scholar
Thompson, William T. and Zuk, Gary. 1983. American Elections and the International Electoral-Economic Cycle: A Test of the Tufte Hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science 27:464–84.Google Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, Jack E. 1983. WEIS vs. COPDAB: Correspondence Problems. International Studies Quarterly 27:161–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingast, Barry R., Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Johnsen, C.. 1982. The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics. Journal of Political Economy 90:.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.