Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-rvxtl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-08T20:34:28.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ideological Interpretations of Presidential Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Teresa E. Levitin  and
Warren E. Miller
Teresa E. Levitin
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Warren E. Miller
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents a new way to define and measure the ideological sentiments of the mass electorate. Citizens are classified in terms of their evaluations and perceptions of liberals and conservatives. The measure is then used to assess the impact of ideology on the 1972 and 1976 presidential elections, to explore citizens' applications of ideological labels to parties, issues, and presidential candidates, and to describe the relationship between ideology and the potential for party realignment as well as meanings of issue voting.

Although many Americans use ideological labels in ways that suggest only a partial understanding of the terms and their implications, those labels have political significance for their political attitudes and election-day decisions.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , September 1979 , pp. 751 - 771
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barnes, Samuel H. (1971). “Left, Right and the Italian Voter.” Comparative Political Studies 4: 157–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, George F.et al. (1978). “Change in the Structure of American Political Attitudes: The Nagging Question of Question Wording.” American Journal of Political Science 22:250–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Richard W. (1972a). “Popular Control of Public Policy: A Normal Vote Analysis of the 1968 Election.” American Political Science Review 66:429–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Richard W. (1972b). “Rejoinder to Comments by Richard A. Brody and Benjamin I. Page and by John H. Kessel.” American Political Science Review 66: 468–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Richard A. (1977). “Stability and Change in Party Identification: Presidential to Off-Years.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Butler, David, and Stokes, Donald E. (1969). Political Change in Britain. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, et al. (1960). The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E., Clausen, Aage E., and Miller, Warren E. (1965). “Electoral Myth and Reality: The 1964 Election.” American Political Science Review 59:321–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E., Clausen, Aage E., and Miller, Warren E. (1966). “The Concept of a Normal Vote.” In Campbell, Anguset al. (eds.), Elections and the Political Order. New York: Wiley, pp. 9–39.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E., Clausen, Aage E., and Miller, Warren E. (1975). “Some Mass Elite Contrasts in the Perception of Political Spaces.” Social Science Information 14:49–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E., Clausen, Aage E., and Miller, Warren E., and Markus, Gregory B. (1979). “Plus ça change…: The New CPS Election Study Panel.” American Political Science Review 73:32–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Murray (1964). The Symbolic Use of Polltics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Holm, John D., and Robinson, John P. (1978). “Ideological Identification and the American Voter.” Public Opinion Quarterly 42:235–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingemann, Hans D. (1972). “Testing the Left-Right Continuum on a Sample of German Voters.” Comparative Political Studies 5:93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingemann, Hans D. (1979, forthcoming). “Ideological Conceptualization of Politics; Indicators and Distributions.” In Barnes, Samuel H. and Kaase, Max (eds.), Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., et al. (1976). “A Majority Party in Disarray: Policy Polarization in the 1972 Election.” American Political Science Review 70: 753–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., and Miller, Warren E. (1976). “Ideology in the 1972 Election: Myth or Reality–A Rejoinder.” American Political Science Review 70:832–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and Levitin, Teresa E. (1977). Leadership and Change: Presidential Elections from 1972 to 1976. Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop.Google Scholar
Nie, Norman H., with Andersen, Kristi (1974). “Mass Belief Systems Revisited: Political Change and Attitude Structure.” Journal of Politics 36: 541–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James A. (1976). “Belief Systems: Constraint, Complexity and the 1972 Election.” In Niemi, Richard G. and Weisberg, Herbert F. (eds.), Controversies in American Voting Behavior. San Francisco: Freeman, pp. 138–59.Google Scholar
Sullivan, John L., Piereson, James E., and Marcus, George E. (1978). “Ideological Constraint in the Mass Public: A Methodological Critique and Some New Findings.” American Journal of Political Science 22: 223–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.