Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:07:30.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Good, the Beautiful, and the Useful: Montaigne's Transvaluation of Values*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

David Lewis Schaefer
David Lewis Schaefer*
Affiliation:
Holy Cross College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Historians of political thought have failed to appreciate the importance of Montaigne's Essays as a major work of modern political philosophy. The neglect of the Essays as a political book is traceable to a widespread belief that Montaigne's thought is too fluctuating and unsystematic to embody a coherent and profound political teaching.

This study challenges the prevailing interpretation of Montaigne's thought by analyzing his critique of the classical understanding of supreme or “heroic” moral virtue, concentrating especially on the chapter entitled “Of Cruelty.” A careful reading of this chapter reveals that underlying the seeming disunity or inconsistency of its argument is a carefully worked out political intention. The essence of Montaigne's political project involves the replacement of a traditional morality based on “beauty” (i.e., one in which humanity aspires to share in the divine) by one embodying “utility” (one in which we understand our needs in the light of what we share with the beasts). The analysis of this “transvaluation of values” helps one to comprehend the foundations of the “bourgeois” morality that characterizes modern liberal regimes.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 73 , Issue 1 , March 1979 , pp. 139 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This article was first presented at the 1978 annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association. I should like to express my gratitude to the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Earhart Foundation, and Holy Cross College for their support, and to the Centre Universitaire International and the Rockefeller Foundation (through its Cultural Center in Bellagio, Italy) for the provision of research facilities. Thanks are also due to Professor Roger Masters of Dartmouth College for his perceptive comments on a previous draft of this article.

References

Bleom, Allan, ed. and trans. (1968). The Republic of Plato. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Brown, Frieda (1963). Religious and Political Conservatism in the “Essais” of Montaigne. Geneva: Librarie Droz.Google Scholar
Descartes, René (1953). Discours de la Méthode. In Bridoux, André (ed.), Oeuvres et Lettres. (Pléiade edition). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Frame, Donald M., ed. and trans. (1957). The Complete Works of Montaigne. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jaffa, Harry V. (1952). Thomism and Aristotelianism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jonas, Hans (1966). “The Practical Uses of Theory.” In The Phenomenon of Life. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Keohane, Nannerl O. (1977). “Montaigne's Individualism.” Political Theory 5, No. 3: 363–90.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò (1964). The Prince. Translated by Musa, Mark. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey C. Jr. (1971). “Thomas Jefferson.” In Frisch, Morton J. and Stevens, Richard G. (eds.), American Political Thought, New York: Scribner's.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de (1962). Oeuvres Complètes. Edited by Thibaudet, Albert and Rat, Maurice (Pléiade edition). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Norton, Grace (1906). Le Plutarque de Montaigne. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Plutarch, (n.d.). The Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romans. Translated by Dryden, John, revised by Clough, Arthur Hugh. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Rosen, Stanley (1969). Nihilism: A Philosophical Essay. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1959–1969). Fragments Autobiographiques. In Gagnebin, Bernard and Raymond, Marcel (ed.), Oeuvres Complètes, 4 vols. (Pléiade edition). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Sayce, Richard A. (1972). The Essays of Montaigne: A Critical Exploration. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schaefer, David Lewis (1975). “Montaigne's Intention and His Rhetoric.” Interpretation 5, No. 1: 58–90.Google Scholar
Schaefer, David Lewis, (forthcoming, 1979). “Montaigne's Political Skepticism.” Polity 9.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo (1958). Thoughts on Machiavelli. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Trafton, Dain (1973). “Ancients and Indians in Montaigne's ‘Des Coches.’” Symposium 27, No. 1: 76–90.Google Scholar
Villey, Pierre (1908). Les Sources et L'Evolution des Essais de Montaigne, 2 vols. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1958). “Science as a Vocation.” In Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright (eds. and trans.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Jacob, ed. and trans. (1935). The Essays of Michel de Montaigne, 3 vols. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.