Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-04T23:41:56.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feminism and Liberalism Reconsidered: The Case of Catharine MacKinnon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2002

Denise Schaeffer
Denise Schaeffer*
Affiliation:
College of the Holy Cross
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Much of contemporary feminist theory presents itself as radically opposed to liberalism. Certain claims made by Catharine MacKinnon have contributed significantly to this view. In this article, however, I argue that certain fundamental aspects of MacKinnon's work must be understood within a liberal framework, even as she challenges the epistemological assumptions that tend to inform liberal political theories. I highlight the ways in which MacKinnon makes use of several fundamental liberal tenets, such as the primacy of individual choice, and then consider how her work contributes to an ongoing discussion about the relevance of liberal theory to contemporary feminist concerns.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 95 , Issue 3 , September 2001 , pp. 699 - 708
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, Anita. 1988. Uneasy Access: Privacy for Women in a Free Society. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Berns, Walter. 1994. “Dirty Words.” The Public Interest 114 (Winter): 119–25.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1996. States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Burgess-Jackson, Keith. 1995. “John Stuart Mill, Radical Feminist.” Social Theory and Practice 21 (Fall): 369–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla. 1991. Beyond Accommodation: Ethical Feminism, Deconstruction and the Law. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla. 1993. Transformations: Recollecting Imaginaion and Sexual Difference. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Daly, Mary. 1978. Gyn/Ecology. The Metaethics of Radical Feminism. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Easton, Susan M. 1994. The Problem of Pornography: Regulation and the Right to Free Speech. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Zillah R. 1993. The Radical Future of Liberal Feminism. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1997. Real Politics: At the Center of Everyday Life. Baltimore, MD, and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Firestone, Shulamith. 1970. The Dialectic of Sex. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Gordon. 1994. “Liberal vs. Radical Feminism Revisited.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 11 (2): 155–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Angela. 1990. “Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory.” Stanford Law Review 42 (3): 581–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1993. Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 1996. “Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom.” Political Theory 24 (February): 46–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Pauline. 1994. Feminism As Radical Humanism. Boulder, CO, and San Francisco: Westview.Google Scholar
Johnston, David. 1994. The Idea of a Liberal Theory: A Critique and Reconstruction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kautz, Steven. 1995. Liberalism and Community. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kensinger, Loretta. 1997. “(In) Quest of Liberal Feminism.” Hypatia 12 (Fall): 178–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiss, Elizabeth. 1997. “Alchemy or Fool's Gold? Assessing the Feminist Doubts about Rights.” In Reconstructing Political Theory: Feminist Perspectives. ed. Mary Lyndon Shanley and Uma Narayan. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, Pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. 1984. Sister/Outsider. New York: Crossing.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1987. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1989. Toward A Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1991a. “Difference and Dominance: On Sex Discrimination.” In Feminist Legal Theory: Readings in Law and Gender. eds. Bartlett, Katharine T. and Kennedy, Rosanne. Boulder, CO: Westview. Pp. 81–94.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1991b. “Feminism, Marxism, Method and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence.” In Feminist Legal Theory: Readings in Law and Gender. ed. Bartlett, Katharine T. and Kennedy, Rosanne. Boulder, CO: Westview. Pp. 181–200.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1992. “Pornography, Civil Rights, and Speech.” In Feminist Philosophies. ed. Janet A. Kourany, James P. Sterba, and Rosemarie Tong. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Pp. 295–308.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1993. Only Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine, and Dworkin, Andrea. 1996. “Statement on Canadian Customs and Legal Approaches to Pornography.” In Radically Speaking: Feminism Reclaimed. ed. Diane Bell and Renate Klein. North Melbourne: Spinifex. Pp. 218–21.Google Scholar
MacLean, Douglas, and Claudia Mills, eds. 1983. Liberalism Reconsidered. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allenheld.Google Scholar
McElroy, Wendy. 1995. XXX: A Woman's Right to Pornography. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1859] 1978. On Liberty. ed. Elizabeth Rapaport. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1869] 1988. The Subjection of Women. ed. Okin, Susan M.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Morgan, Robin. 1996. “Light Bulbs, Radishes, and the Politics of the 21st Century.” In Radically Speaking: Feminism Reclaimed. ed. Diane Bell and Renate Klein. North Melbourne: Spinifex.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 1999. Sex and Social Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1990. “Feminism, the Individual, and Contract Theory.” Ethics 100 (April): 658–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, Gender and the Family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1990. “Sex and Power.” Ethics 100 (January): 398–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, Diana. 1990. “Welfare Is Not for Women: Why the War on Poverty Cannot Conquer the Feminization of Poverty.” In Women, the State, and Welfare. ed. Linda Gordon. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. Pp. 265–79.Google Scholar
Rapaport, Elizabeth. 1993. “Generalizing Gender: Reason and Essence in the Legal Thought of Catharine MacKinnon.” In A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity. Boulder, CO: Westview. Pp. 127–43.Google Scholar
Ring, Jennifer. 1987. “Saving Objectivity for Feminism: MacKinnon, Marx and Other Possibilities.” Review of Politics 49 (Fall): 467–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ring, Jennifer. 1991. Modern Political Theory and Contemporary Feminism: A Dialectical Analysis. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. [1782] 1968. On the Social Contract. trans. Maurice Cranston. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal Thinking: Toward a Politics of Peace. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Scoccia, Danny. 1996. “Can Liberals Support a Ban on Violent Pornography?” Ethics 106 (July): 776–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinopoli, Richard, and Hirschmann, Nancy J.. 1991. “Feminism and Liberal Theory.” American Political Science Review 85 (March): 221–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendell, Susan. 1987. “A Qualified Defense of Liberal Feminism.” Hypatia 2 (Summer): 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yack, Bernard, ed. 1996. Liberalism Without Illusions: Essays on Liberal Theory and the Political Vision of Judith N. Shklar. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.