Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-04T23:34:41.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factions in Committees: The U.S. House of Representatives*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Glenn R. Parker  and
Suzanne L. Parker
Glenn R. Parker
Affiliation:
Miami University
Suzanne L. Parker
Affiliation:
Miami University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study undertakes a major reanalysis of the decision-making processes in eight committees of the U.S. House of Representatives–Agriculture, Education and Labor, Interior and Insular Affairs, International Relations, Interstate and Foreign Commerce, Post Office and Civil Service, Public Works and Ways and Means. While past studies have relied mainly on interviews, this study uses a data base composed of recorded committee roll-call votes. The analysis consists of a Q-component analysis to determine voting blocs or factions; an R-component analysis to discover issue dimensions; and step-wise regression and correlation utilizing demographic, political and electoral characteristics to define the nature of the voting blocs. The results are then compared with previous analyses of the same eight committees to determine what changes, if any, have occurred since the committees were last analyzed. The findings suggest that partisanship and ideology have become stronger influences on committee decision making than previously noted.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 73 , Issue 1 , March 1979 , pp. 85 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An expanded version of this article was presented at the 1977 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.

The authors wish to acknowledge the encouragement and advice of several colleagues: Larry Dodd, Richard Fenno, Leroy Rieselbach, and Herb Weisberg. None of these individuals, however, bears any responsibility for the interpretations presented in this analysis.

References

Fenno, Richard F. (1973). Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Grumm, John G. (1963). “A Factor Analysis of Legislative Behavior.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 7:336–56.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles O. (1961). “Representation in Congress: The Case of the House Agriculture Committee.” American Political Science Review 55:358–67.Google Scholar
Murphy, James T. (1974). “Political Parties and the Porkbarrel: Party Conflict and Cooperation in House Public Works Committee Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 68:169–85.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Norman J. and Rhode, David W. (1976). “Shifting Forces, Changing Rules and Political Outcomes: The Impact of Congressional Change on Four House Committees.” Paper presented at the Symposium on Legislative Reform and Public Policy, Lincoln, Nebraska.Google Scholar
Price, David E., et al. (1975). The Commerce Committees. New York: Grossman.Google Scholar
Rummel, R. J. (1970). Applied Factor Analysis. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Tacheron, Donald G. and Udall, Morris K. (1970). The Job of the Congressman. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.