Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T11:34:48.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Extending Offensive Realism: The Louisiana Purchase and America's Rise to Regional Hegemony

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2004

COLIN ELMAN
COLIN ELMAN
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

John Mearsheimer suggests that, whenever possible, great powers are constrained to seek regional hegemony, the safest feasible situation for a state. This objective is hard to achieve because other great powers want to block the attempt, but it is doable because buck-passing and other hurdles make balancing inefficient. Contra Mearsheimer, I argue that it is the absence of balancers, not balancing inefficiencies, that best explains when states can hope to dominate their neighborhoods. Regional hegemony is only achievable when it is easy. I use property space techniques to develop an extended version of offensive realism that clarifies why states will sometimes prefer not to block a hegemonic bid. In particular, I argue that local considerations will often prevent a continental great power from responding to a rising state in another region. I test my argument by process tracing the U.S. purchase of Louisiana and show that France's decision to sell is best explained by its pursuit of its own territorial ambitions. My extended version of offensive realism suggests that its single success story of the last 200 years, U.S. dominance of North America, provides no encouragement to contemporary states contemplating a bid for regional hegemony.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 98 , Issue 4 , November 2004 , pp. 563 - 576
Copyright
© 2004 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams Mary P. 1955. “Jefferson's Reaction to the Treaty of San Ildefenso.” Journal of Southern History 21 (2): 173– 88.Google Scholar
Aiton Arthur S. 1931. “The Diplomacy of the Louisiana Cession.” American Historical Review 36 (4): 701– 20.Google Scholar
Bailey Hugh C., and Bernerd C. Weber. 1960. “A British Reaction to the Treaty of San Ildefenso.” William and Mary Quarterly 17 (2): 242– 46.Google Scholar
Bailey Kenneth D. 1972. “Polythetic Reduction of Monothetic Property Space.” Sociological Methodology 4: 83– 111.Google Scholar
Bailey Kenneth D. 1973. “Monothetic and Polythetic Typologies and Their Relation to Conceptualization Measurement, and Scaling.” American Sociological Review 38: 18– 32.Google Scholar
Barbé-Marbois Francois. 1830/1977. The History of Louisiana: Particularly of the Cession of That Colony to the United States of America. Philadelphia: Carey and Lea (reprinted 1977 by the Louisiana State University Press).
Barton A. H. 1955. “The Concept of Property-Space in Social Research.” In Language of Social Research, ed. P. F. Lazarsfeld and M. Rosenberg. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 40– 53.
Bennett Andrew, and Alexander George. 2001. “Case Studies and Process Tracing in History and Political Science: Similar Strokes for Different Foci.” In Bridges and Boundaries: Historians, Political Scientists and the Study of International Relations, ed. Colin Elman and Miriam Fendius Elman. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Browning Oscar. 1887. England and Napoleon in 1803: Being the Despatches of Lord Whitworth and Others. London: Longmans, Green.
Cerami Charles A. 2003. Jefferson's Great Gamble: The Remarkable Story of Jefferson, Napoleon and the Men Behind the Louisiana Purchase. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks.
Christie Ian R. 1982. Wars and Revolutions: Britain, 1760–1815. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Colomb R. W. 1929. “Documents Concerning the Financing of the Louisiana Purchase by France and by the United States.” Louisiana Historical Quarterly 12 (2): 202– 37.Google Scholar
DeConde Alexander 1976. This Affair of Louisiana. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Documents. 1927. “Despatches from the United States Consulate in New Orleans, 1801–1803, Part I.” American Historical Review 32 (4): 801– 24.
Documents. 1928. “Despatches from the United States Consulate in New Orleans, 1801–1803, Part II.” American Historical Review 33 (2): 331– 59.
Eckstein Harry. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” In Handbook of Political Science. Vol. 7, ed. Fred Greenstein and Nelson Polsby. Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley, 79– 137.
Elman Colin. 2005. “Explanatory Typologies in the Qualitative Study of International Politics.” International Organization. Forthcoming.
Fletcher Mildred Stahl. 1930. “Louisiana as a Factor in French Diplomacy.” Mississippi Valley Historical Review 17 (3): 367– 76.Google Scholar
George Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gill Conrad. 1909. “The Relations between England and France in 1802.” English Historical Review 24 (93): 61– 78.Google Scholar
Glaser Charles L. 1994/95. “Realists as Optimists: Cooperation as Self-Help.” International Security 19 (Summer): 50– 90.Google Scholar
Glaser Charles L. 1997. “The Security Dilemma Revisited.” World Politics 50 (October): 171– 210.Google Scholar
James J. A. 1914. “Louisiana as a Factor in American Diplomacy, 1795–1800.” Mississippi Valley Historical Review 1 (1): 44– 56.Google Scholar
Knudson Jerry W. 1969. “Newspaper Reaction to the Louisiana Purchase: ‘This New, Immense, Unbounded World.’” Missouri Historical Review 63 (January): 182– 213.Google Scholar
Kukla J. 2003. A Wilderness So Immense: The Louisiana Purchase and The Destiny of America. New York, Alfred A. Knopf.
Labs Eric. 1997. “Beyond Victory: Offensive Realism and the Expansion of War Aims.” Security Studies 6 (4): 1– 49.Google Scholar
Layne Christopher. 2005. The Peace of Illusions: International Relations Theory and American Grand Strategy from 1940 to the Present. Forthcoming.
Lazarsfeld P. F. 1937. “Some Remarks on the Typological Procedures in Social Research.” Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 6: 119– 39.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld Paul F. 1965. “Qualitative Measurement in the Social Sciences: Classification, Typologies, and Indices.” In The Policy Sciences, ed. Daniel Lerner and Harold D. Lasswell. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 155– 92.
Levy Jack. 2003. “Balances and Balancing: Concepts, Propositions and Research Design.” In Realism and the Balancing of Power: A New Debate, ed. John A. Vasquez and Colin Elman. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 128– 53.
Lokke Carl Ludwig. 1925. “The Leclerc Instructions.” Journal of Negro History 10 (1): 80– 98.Google Scholar
Lyon E. Wilson. 1932. “The Closing of the Port of New Orleans.” American Historical Review 37 (2): 280– 83.Google Scholar
Lyon E. Wilson. 1934/74. Louisiana in French Diplomacy 1759–1804. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Mahan A. T. 1897. The Influence of Sea Power upon the French Revolution and Empire. Vol. 2. Boston: Little, Brown.
Mearsheimer John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton.
Pelzer Louis. 1913. “Economic Factors in the Acquisition of Louisiana.” Proceedings of the Mississippi Valley Historical Association 5: 109– 28.Google Scholar
Perkins Bradford. 1955. “England and the Louisiana Question.” Huntington Library Quarterly 18: 279– 95.Google Scholar
Perkins Bradford. 1993. The Cambridge History of American Foreign Relations: Vol. I. The Creation of a Republican Empire, 1776–1865. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ragin Charles. 2000. Fuzzy Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Richmond Herbert W. 1941. The Invasion of Britain: An Account of Plans, Attempts, and Counter-Measures from 1586 to 1918. London: Methuen.
Riley F. L. 1897. “Spanish Policy in Mississippi After the Treaty of San Lorenzo.” Annual Report of the American Historical Association for the Year 1897: 175– 92.Google Scholar
Robertson C. F. 1885. “The Louisiana Purchase in Its Influence upon the American System.” Papers of the American Historical Association 1 (4): 253– 90.Google Scholar
Schroeder Paul W. 1994. The Transformation of European Politics 1763–1848. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schweller Randall L. 1993. “Tripolarity and the Second World War.” International Studies Quarterly 37 (1): 73– 103.Google Scholar
Schweller Randall L. 1994. “Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back in.” International Security 19 (1): 72– 107.Google Scholar
Schweller Randall L. 1996. “Neorealism's Status-Quo Bias: What Security Dilemma?” Security Studies 5 (Spring): 90– 121.Google Scholar
Schweller Randall L. 1997. “New Realist Research on Alliances: Refining, Not Refuting, Waltz's Balancing Proposition.” American Political Science Review 91 (December): 927– 30.Google Scholar
Schweller Randall L. 1998. Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler's Strategy of World Conquest. New York: Columbia University Press.
Shepherd William R. 1904. “The Cession of Louisiana to Spain.” Political Science Quarterly 19 (3): 439– 58.Google Scholar
Skolnik Richard. 1969. 1803: Jefferson's Decision—The United States Purchases Louisiana. New York: Chelsea House Publishers.
Sloane William M. 1899. “Napoleon's Plans for a Colonial System.” American Historical Review 4 (3): 439– 55.Google Scholar
Sloane William M. 1904. “The World Aspects of the Louisiana Purchase.” American Historical Review 9: 507– 21.Google Scholar
Smith Ronald D. 1971. “Napoleon and Louisiana: Failure of the Proposed Expedition to Occupy and Defend Louisiana, 1801–1803.” Louisiana History 12 (1): 21– 41.Google Scholar
Snyder Jack. 1991. Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Stoddard T. Lothrop. 1914. The French Revolution in San Domingo. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company: The University Press Cambridge.
Turner Frederick Jackson. 1905. “The Policy of France Toward the Mississippi Valley in the Period of Washington and Adams.” American Historical Review 10 (2): 249– 79.Google Scholar
Van Evera Stephen. 1999. Causes of War: Power and the Roots of Conflict. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Ward A. W., and G. P. Gooch. 1922/70. The Cambridge History of British Foreign Policy 1783–1919: Vol. I (1783–1815). New York: Octagon Books (reprint of Cambridge University Press volume).
Whitaker Arthur P. 1934. “The Retrocession of Louisiana in Spanish Policy.” American Historical Review 39 (3): 454– 76.Google Scholar
Whitaker Arthur P. 1936. “Louisiana in the Treaty of Basel.” Journal of Modern History 8 (1): 1– 26.Google Scholar
Winston J. E. 1929. “How the Louisiana Purchase Was Financed.” Louisiana Historical Quarterly 12 (2): 189– 201.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.