Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:12:15.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exposure to Information, Belief Integration, and Individual Responsiveness to Agenda Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Michael MacKuen
Michael MacKuen*
Affiliation:
Washington University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines individual responsiveness to the media's changing political agenda during the years from 1964 to 1980. In the context of a dynamic model, the data indicate that responsiveness is positively associated with education, political interest, and a social motivation to attend to public affairs. A two-component model, in which heightened involvement increases individuals' exposure to information but also decreases their receptivity to the impact of the messages, is considered in a multivariate analysis. Although the results are only suggestive, the exposure function appears to operate for all three variables, whereas the inhibitions owing to the integration of previous information are evident only for political interest. Some speculations are offered about how these results may elaborate models of democratic public choice.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 78 , Issue 2 , June 1984 , pp. 372 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alt, J., & Chrystal, K. A.Political economics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Amemiya, T.Qualitative response models: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 1981, 19, 1483–1536.Google Scholar
Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M.Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. San Francisco: Holden-Day, 1976.Google Scholar
Bybee, C., McLeod, J. M., Luetscher, W., & Garramone, G.Mass communication and voter volatility. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1981, 45, 469–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, R. & Elder, C.Participation in American politics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Converse, P.Information flow and stability of partisan attitudes. In Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, D.. Elections and the political order. New York: Wiley, 1966.Google Scholar
Crenson, M.The un-politics of air pollution. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A preface to democratic theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Davis, O., Hinich, M., & Ordeshook, P.An expository development of a mathematical model of the electoral process. American Political Science Review, 1970, 64, 426–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, A.An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row, 1957.Google Scholar
Dreyer, E.Media use and electoral choices: Some political consequences of information exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1971, 35, 544–553.Google Scholar
Erbring, L., Goldenberg, E., & Miller, A.Front page news and real world cues: A new look at agendasetting by the media. American Journal of Political Science, 1980, 24, 16–49.Google Scholar
Fiorina, M. P.Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Funkhouser, G. R.The issues of the sixties: An exploratory study in the dynamics of public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1973, 37, 62–75.Google Scholar
Genova, B. K. L., & Greenberg, B. S.Interest in the news and the knowledge gap. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1979, 43, 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbs, D. A.The dynamics of political support for American presidents among occupational and partisan groups. American Journal of Political Science, 1982, 26, 212–223. (a)Google Scholar
Hibbs, D. A.Economic outcomes and political support for British governments among occupational classes: A dynamic analysis. American Political Science Review, 1982, 76, 259–279. (b)Google Scholar
Hofstetter, C. R., & Zukin, C.TV network political news and advertising in the Nixon and McGovern campaigns. Journalism Quarterly, 1979, 56, 106–115, 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S., Peters, M. D., & Kinder, D. R.Experimental demonstrations of the “not-so-minimal” consequences of television news programs. American Political Science Review, 1982, 76, 848–858.Google Scholar
Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P.Personal influence. New York: Free Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Kazee, T.Television exposure and attitude change: The impact of political interest. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1981, 45, 507–518.Google Scholar
Klapper, J. T.The effects of mass communication. New York: Free Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Kraus, S., & Davis, D.The effects of mass communication on political behavior. University Park, Penn.: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C.Politics and markets. New York: Basic Books, 1977.Google Scholar
MacKuen, M.Social communication and the mass policy agenda. In MacKuen, M. & Coombs, S., More than news. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1981.Google Scholar
May, R.Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1973.Google ScholarPubMed
McCombs, M.Newspaper versus television: Mass communication effects across time. In Shaw, D. & McCombs, M., The emergence of American political issues. St. Paul: West, 1977.Google Scholar
McCombs, M., & Shaw, D.The agenda-setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1972, 36, 176–187.Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J.Persuasion, resistance, and attitude change. In Pool, I. de Sola, Frey, F., Schramm, W., Maccoby, N., & Parker, E. B.. Handbook of communication. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973.Google Scholar
McKelvey, R.Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control. Journal of Economic Theory, 1976, 12, 472–482.Google Scholar
McLeod, J., Becker, L., & Byrnes, J.Another look at the agenda-setting function of the press. Communication Research, 1974, 1, 131–166.Google Scholar
Mueller, J.War, presidents and public opinion. New York: Wiley, 1973.Google Scholar
Mueller, J.Public expectations of war during the cold war. American Journal of Political Science, 1979, 23, 301–329.Google Scholar
Neuman, W.Differentiation and integration: Two dimensions of political thinking. American Journal of Sociology, 1981, 86, 1236–1268.Google Scholar
Noelle-Neumann, E.The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 1974, 24, 43–51.Google Scholar
Noelle-Neumann, E.Public opinion and the classical tradition: A reevaluation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1979, 43, 143–156.Google Scholar
O'Keefe, G., & Atwood, L. E.Communication and election campaigns. In Nimmo, D. & Sanders, K., Handbook of political communication. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1981, pp. 329–357.Google Scholar
Patterson, T.The mass media election. New York: Praeger, 1980.Google Scholar
Ralston, M., & Jenrich, R. I.DUD, A derivative free algorithm for non-linear least squares. Technometrics, 1978, 1, 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, W. H.Implications from the disequilibrium of majority rule for the study of institutions. American Political Science Review, 1980, 74, 432–446.Google Scholar
Rogers, E.Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Shannon, C., & Weaver, W.The mathematical theory of communication. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Shaw, E.The interpersonal agenda. In Shaw, D. & McCombs, M., The emergence of American political issues. St. Paul, Minn.: West, 1977.Google Scholar
Shepsle, K.Institutional arrangements and equilibrium in multidimensional voting models. American Journal of Political Science, 1979, 25, 27–59.Google Scholar
Sigal, L.Reporters and officials. Lexington, Mass.: Heath, 1973.Google Scholar
Sohn, A.A longitudinal analysis of local non-political agenda-setting effects. Journalism Quarterly, 1978, 55, 325–333.Google Scholar
Tan, A.Mass media use, issue knowledge and political involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1980, 44, 241–248.Google Scholar
Tichenor, P., Donahue, O., & Olien, C.Mass media and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1970, 34, 158–170.Google Scholar
Tipton, L., Haney, R., & Basehart, J.Media agenda-setting in city and state election campaigns. Journalism Quarterly, 1975, 52, 15–22.Google Scholar
Watt, J., & van den Berg, S.How time dependency influences media effects in a community controversy. Journalism Quarterly, 1981, 25, 43–50.Google Scholar
Weaver, D. H., Graber, D. A., McCombs, M. E. & Eyal, C. H.Media agenda-setting in a presidential election. New York: Praeger, 1981.Google Scholar
Winter, J., & Eyal, C. H.Agenda setting for the civil rights issue. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1981, 45, 376–383.Google Scholar
Zukin, C.A reconsideration of the effects of information on partisan stability. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1977, 41, 244–254.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.