Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T06:35:38.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining the Democratic Peace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2005

SEBASTIAN ROSATO
SEBASTIAN ROSATO
Affiliation:
The University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I am grateful for the opportunity to respond to the rejoinders to my article, “The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory” (Rosato 2003). In each case, I summarize the core issues at stake and explain why I do not believe that my critics have succeeded in casting serious doubt on my original argument.

Type
FORUM
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 99 , Issue 3 , August 2005 , pp. 467 - 472
Copyright
© 2005 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bueno de Mesquita Bruce, et al. 1999. “An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review 93 (December): 791– 812.Google Scholar
Chiozza Giacomo, and H. E. Goemans. 2004. “International Conflict and the Tenure of Leaders: Is War Still Ex Post Inefficient?” American Journal of Political Science 48 (July): 604– 19.Google Scholar
Doyle Michael W. 1997. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs.” In Debating the Democratic Peace, ed. Michael E. Brown, Sean M. Lynn-Jones, and Steven E. Miller. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Doyle Michael W. 2005. “Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace.” American Political Science Review 99 (August): 463– 66.Google Scholar
Henderson Errol A. 2002. Democracy and War: The End of an Illusion? Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Kinsella David. 2005. “No Rest for the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review 99 (August): 453– 57.Google Scholar
MacDonald Paul K. 2003. “Useful Fiction or Miracle Maker: The Competing Epistemological Foundations of Rational Choice Theory.” American Political Science Review 97 (November): 551– 66.Google Scholar
Powell Robert. 1999. “The Modeling Enterprise and Security Studies.” International Security 24 (Fall): 97– 106.Google Scholar
Rosato Sebastian. 2003. “The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory.” American Political Science Review 97 (November): 585– 602.Google Scholar
Russett Bruce. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post Cold War World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schultz Kenneth A. 2001. Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Singer J. David, and Melvin Small. 1994. Correlates of War Project: International and Civil War Data, 1816–1992 [computer file] (Study 9905). Ann Arbor, MI: J. David Singer and Melvin Small [producers], 1993. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1994.
Slantchev Branislav L., Anna Alexandrova, and Erik Gartzke. 2005. “Probabilistic Causality, Selection Bias, and the Logic of the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review 99 (August): 459– 62.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.