Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T01:25:54.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethics and Politics: A Response to Terchek and Moore

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Thomas W. Smith
Thomas W. Smith*
Affiliation:
Villanova University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I respond to Terchek and Moore by investigating the interrelationship of ethics to politics in Aristotle's thought. To this end I defend two claims. First, doing ethics requires understanding politics. Second, politics requires practical wisdom and ethics. Since even the politics wanted by Terchek and Moore requires these virtues, they are wrong to claim that my account of the common good, resting as it does on similar virtues, is impractical and dangerous.

Type
Forum
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 94 , Issue 4 , December 2000 , pp. 913 - 918
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adkins, A. W. H. 1991. “The Connection between Aristotle's Ethics and Politics.” in A Companion to Aristotle's Politics, ed. Keyt, David and Miller, Fred D. Jr.Oxford: Blackwell. Pp. 75–93.Google Scholar
Aristotelis, . 1986. Politico, ed. Ross, W. D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotelis, . 1988. Ethica Nicomachea, ed. Bywater, I. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bodéüs, Richard. 1993. The Political Dimensions of Aristotle's Ethics, trans. Garrett, Jan Edward. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Burrell, David. 1973. Analogy and Philosophical Language. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, R. A., and Jolif, J. Y.. 1959. L'Éthique à Nicomaque. Louvain et Paris: Publications Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Lord, Carnes. 1981. “The Character and Composition of Aristotle's Politics.” Political Theory 9 (Spring): 459–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclntyre, Alasdair. 1984. After Virtue: Second Edition. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1993. “Equity and Mercy.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 22: 452–76.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1961. The Collected Dialogues, ed. Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntington. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, Christopher. 1991. “Aims and Methods in Aristotle's Politics.” In A Companion to Aristotle's Politics, ed. Keyt, David and Miller, Fred D. Jr.Oxford: Blackwell. Pp. 57–74.Google Scholar
Salkever, Stephen. 1991. “Aristotle's Social Science.” In Essays on The Foundations of Aristotelian Political Science, ed. Lord, Carnes and O'Connor, David. Berkeley: University of Los Angeles Press. Pp. 11–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Peter. 1998. A Philosophical Commentary on the Politics of Aristotle. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Thomas W. 1993. “The Protreptic Character of the Nicomachean Ethics.” Polity 27 (Winter): 307–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Thomas W. 1998. “Mastery in Politics I.” Villanova University. Typescript.Google Scholar
Smith, Thomas W. 1999. “Aristotle on the Conditions for and Limits of the Common Good.” American Political Science Review 93 (09): 625–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Thomas W. N.d. Revaluing Ethics: Aristotle's Dialectical Pedagogy. Albany: State University of New York Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1953. Natural Right and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Terchek, Ronald. 1997. Republican Paradoxes and Liberal Anxieties. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Terchek, Ronald, and Moore, David. 2000. “Recovering the Political Aristotle: A Critical Response to Smith.” American Political Science Review 94 (12): 905–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanderWaerdt, Paul. 1985. “The Plan and Intention of Aristotle's Ethical and Political Writings.” Illinois Classical Studies 16: 231–53.Google Scholar
Voegelin, Eric. 1957. Plato and Aristotle. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.