Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:06:47.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Leadership Succession in the Soviet Union

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Valerie Bunce  and
Philip G. Roeder
Valerie Bunce
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Philip G. Roeder
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What happens when there is a change in leadership in the Soviet Union? Does the period of leadership succession present unusual opportunities for domestic policy concerns to be vented? Or, are major issues on the Soviet domestic policy agenda addressed mainly after a succession of leadership is completed? Answers to such questions have a bearing on how the Soviet elite is replenished, and more generally help to improve understanding of Soviet politics. Two specialists on Soviet and East European politics, Valerie Bunce and Philip Roeder, have been drawn to different conclusions about these issues.

Type
Controversies
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 80 , Issue 1 , March 1986 , pp. 215 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

B Ts. K. KPSS, Soveta Ministrov SSSR i VTsSPS. May 21, 1985. Pravda.Google Scholar
Barber, James David. 1972. The Presidential Character. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bialer, Seweryn. 1976. The Soviet Political Elite and Internal Developments in the USSR. In Griffith, William E., ed., The Soviet Empire: Expansion and Detente. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Breslauer, George. 1976. Khrushchev Reconsidered. Problems of Communism, 25:18–33.Google Scholar
Breslauer, George. 1982a. Khrushchev and Brezhnev as headers: Building Authority in Soviet Politics. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Breslauer, George. 1982b. Reformism, Conservatism, and Leadership Authority at the 26th Party Congress. In Gustafson, Thane and Bialer, Seweryn, eds., Russia at the Crossroads. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Branson, David W., and Krueger, Constance. 1971. The Revolution in Soviet Farm Household Income, 1953–1967. In Millar, James, ed., The Soviet Rural Community: A Symposium. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Archie. 1982a. Leadership Succession and Policy Innovation. In Brown, Archie and Kaser, Michael, eds., Soviet Policy in the 1980s. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Archie. 1982b. Political Developments: Some Conclusions and an Interpretation. In Brown, Archie and Kaser, Michael, eds., Soviet Policy in the 1980s. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Archie. 1985. Gorbachev: New Man in the Kremlin. Problems of Communism, 34:1–23.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 1980. The Succession Connection: Policy Cycles and Political Change in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. American Political Science Review, 74:966–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 1981. Do New Leaders Make a Difference? Executive Succession and Public Policy Under Capitalism and Socialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 1983. The Political Economy of the Brezhnev Era: The Rise and Fall of Corporatism. British Journal of Political Science, 13:129–58.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, Lawrence H. 1946. The President, Congress, and Legislation. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colton, Timothy J. 1984. The Dilemma of Reform in the Soviet Union. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
Daniels, Robert Vincent. 1971. Soviet Policies Since Khrushchev. In Strong, H., ed., The Soviet Union Under Brezhnev and Kosygin. New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold.Google Scholar
DeMaio, Alfred. 1974. Soviet Urban Housing. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Garbuzov, V. 1971. O gosudarstvennom biudzhete SSSR na 1972 god i ob ispolnenii gosudarstvennogo biudzheta SSSR na 1971 god. Moscow: Politizdat.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, William M. 1974. The Growth of Presidential Power. Vol. 3, Triumph and Reappraisal. New York: Chelsea House.Google Scholar
Gorbachev, M. April 14, 1985. O sozyve ocherednogo XXVII S'ezda KPSS i zadachakh sviazannikh s ego podgotovkoi i provedeniem. Pravda, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
Hammer, Darrell P. 1974. USSR: The Politics of Oligarchy. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Hough, Jerry. 1976. The Brezhnev Era: The Man and the System. Problems of Communism, 25: 1–17.Google Scholar
Linden, Carl. 1966. Khrushchev and the Soviet Leadership. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Maier, V. 1974. Rost' narodnogo blagososoianiia v usloviakh razvitogo sotsializma. Kommunist, 9: 62–75.Google Scholar
McAuley, Alastair. 1978. Economic Welfare in the Soviet Union. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Narkhoz. See Narodnoe khoziaistvo SSSR.Google Scholar
Narodnoe khoziaistvo SSSR. 1959, 1962, 1976. Moscow: Statistika.Google Scholar
Pryor, Frederik. 1968. Public Expenditures in Communist and Capitalist Countries. Home-wood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
Roeder, Philip G. 1984. Soviet Policies and Kremlin Politics. International Studies Quarterly, 289: 171–94.Google Scholar
Roeder, Philip G. 1985. Do New Leaders Really Make a Difference? Rethinking the “Succession Connection.” American Political Science Review. In press.Google Scholar
Rush, Myron. 1968. Political Succession in the USSR. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
SEV. See Statisticheskii ezhegodnik stran.Google Scholar
Slusser, Robert M. 1967. America, China, and the Hydra-Headed Opposition: The Dynamics of Soviet Foreign Policy. In Juviler, Peter and Morton, Henry, eds., Soviet Policy-Making: Studies of Communism in Transition. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Spitzer, Robert J. 1983. The Presidency and Public Policy: The Four Arenas of Presidential Power. University, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Statisticheskii ezhegodnik stran: Chlenov soveta ekonomicheskoi vzaimopomoshchi. 1971, 1976. Moscow: Statistika.Google Scholar
U.N. Statistical Yearbooks. See United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations. Department of International and Economic Social Affairs, Statistical Office. 1972, 1979. Statistical Yearbooks 1971, 1978. XXIII, XXX. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Volkov, I. 1973. Razvitie sel'skogo khoziaistva SSSR v poslevoenogo gody (1946–1970). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Yevdokimov, V. 1974. Kontrol' za ispolneniem gosudarstvennogo biudzheta SSSR. Moscow: Ekonomika.Google Scholar
Zagladin, V. 1985. Strategiia razvitiia, blagosostoianiia mira. Novoe vremia, 22:5–7.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.