Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Soss, Joe
and
Canon, David T
1995.
Partisan Divisions and Voting Decisions: U.S. Senators, Governors, and the Rise of a Divided Federal Government.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 2,
p.
253.
Chadha, Anita
and
Bernstein, Robert A.
1996.
Why Incumbents Are Treated So Harshly.
American Politics Quarterly,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 3,
p.
363.
Nannestad, Peter
and
Paldam, Martin
1997.
The grievance asymmetry revisited: A micro study of economic voting in Denmark,1986–1992.
European Journal of Political Economy,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
81.
Edwards III, George C.
1997.
Aligning Tests with Theory: Presidential Approval as a Source of Influence in Congress.
Congress & the Presidency,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 2,
p.
113.
MacDONALD, JASON A.
and
SIGELMAN, LEE
1999.
Public Assessments of Gubernatorial Performance.
American Politics Quarterly,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 2,
p.
201.
Burns, Peter F.
1999.
The Gubernatorial Coattail Hypothesis Considered: Determining the Effects of the Gubernatorial Race on the Senatorial Contest.
Southeastern Political Review,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 1,
p.
151.
Hansen, Susan B.
1999.
“Life Is Not Fair”: Governors' Job Performance Ratings and State Economies.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 1,
p.
167.
Nadeau, Richard
Niemi, Richard G.
and
Amato, Timothy
1999.
Elite Economic Forecasts, Economic News, Mass Economic Judgments, and Presidential Approval.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 61,
Issue. 1,
p.
109.
Blount, Simon
1999.
The microeconomic voter.
Electoral Studies,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
505.
Koch, Jeffrey W
2000.
Candidate status, presidential approval, and voting for US senator.
Electoral Studies,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 4,
p.
479.
Adams, Greg D.
and
Squire, Peverill
2001.
A Note on the Dynamics and Idiosyncrasies of Gubernatorial Popularity.
State Politics & Policy Quarterly,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 4,
p.
380.
Orth, Deborah A.
2001.
Accountability in a Federal System: The Governor, the President, and Economic Expectations.
State Politics & Policy Quarterly,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 4,
p.
412.
Atkesoncc, Lonna Rae
and
Partin, Randall W
2001.
Candidate Advertisements, Media Coverage, and Citizen Attitudes: The Agendas and Roles of Senators and Governors in a Federal System.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 54,
Issue. 4,
p.
795.
Lasley, Scott
and
Stegmaier, Mary
2001.
A Comparison of National Effects on Individual U.S. Senate Elections.
Politics & Policy,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 3,
p.
545.
Barreiro, Belén
2001.
Controlling Governments.
p.
17.
RUDALEVIGE, ANDREW
2001.
Revisiting Midterm Loss.
American Politics Research,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 1,
p.
25.
Hunter, Kenneth G.
2001.
An Analysis of the Effect of Lobbying Efforts and Demand-Side Economic Development Policies on State Economic Health.
Public Administration Quarterly,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 1,
p.
49.
King, James D.
2001.
Incumbent Popularity and Vote Choice in Gubernatorial Elections.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 2,
p.
585.
Gross, Donald A.
and
Goidel, Robert K.
2001.
The Impact of State Campaign Finance Laws.
State Politics & Policy Quarterly,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 2,
p.
180.
Mikhailov, Nikolai
Niemi, Richard G.
and
Weimer, David L.
2002.
Application of Theil group logit methods to district-level vote shares: tests of prospective and retrospective voting in the 1991, 1993, and 1997 Polish elections.
Electoral Studies,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 4,
p.
631.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.