Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:31:33.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dynamics of Structural Realignment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Stuart Elaine Macdonald  and
George Rabinowitz
Stuart Elaine Macdonald
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
George Rabinowitz
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Governments render decisions on how resources and values are allocated in a society. In the United States, Congress is the institution in which most of the key allocating decisions are made. To the extent the U.S. political system is integrated, the coalitions that form around the issues debated in Congress should be reflected in the coalitions that support presidential candidates and those that support the major political parties. We formulate a spatial theory of political change in which new ideological cleavages appear in congressional behavior and presidential elections and gradually reorganize the mass party base. The theory leads us explicitly to consider the question of dealignment and to specify conditions under which the parties will lose support from voters.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , September 1987 , pp. 775 - 796
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, John H. 1983. A Spatial Model with Party Activists: Implications for Electoral Dynamics. Public Choice 41:63–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David W. 1985. A Reevaluation of Realignments in American Politics: Evidence from the House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 79:28–49.Google Scholar
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Electoral Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A. 1986. On the Structure and Sequence of Issue Evolution. American Political Science Review 80:901–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Phillip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Clubb, Jerome N., Flanigan, William H., and Zingale, Nancy H. 1980. Partisan Realignment: Voters, Parties, and Government in American History. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Cobb, Roger W., and Elder, Charles D. 1972. Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda Building. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David E. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Cotter, Cornelius P., Gibson, James L., Bibby, John F., and Huchshorn, Robert J. 1984. Party Organization in American Politics. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
David, Paul T. 1972. Party Strength in the United States, 1872-1970. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Enelow, James, and Hinich, Melvin. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erbring, Lutz, Nie, Norman, and Hamburg, Edward. 1986. The Dynamics of Political Realignment: Mobilization, Recruitment, and Conversion. Paper presented at the 1986 meetings of the American Political Science Association, Washington.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
MacRae, Duncan Jr., and Meldrum, James A. 1960. Critical Elections in Illinois: 1888-1958. American Political Science Review 73:538–60.Google Scholar
Nie, Norman H., and Anderson, Kristi. 1974. Mass Belief Systems Revisited: Political Change and Attitude Structure. Journal of Politics 36:541–91.Google Scholar
Pomper, Gerald. 1972. From Confusion to Clarity: Issues and the American Voter. American Political Science Review 66:415–28.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Daniels, R. Steven. 1985. Ideology, Party, and Voting in the U.S. Congress 1959-1980. American Political Science Review 79:373–99.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1985a. A Spatial Model of Legislative Roll Call Analysis. American Journal of Political Science 29:357–84.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1985b. The Unidimensional Congress: 1919–1984. Paper presented at the 1985 meetings of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, George. 1973. Spatial Models of Electoral Behavior: An Empirical Analysis. Chapel Hill, NC: Institute for Research in Social Science.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, George, Gurian, Paul-Henri, and Macdonald, Stuart Elaine. 1984. The Structure of Presidential Elections and the Process of Realignment. American Journal of Political Science 28:611–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven. 1983. Forecasting Presidential Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960. Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1985. The New American Political Party. American Political Science Review 79:1152–69.Google Scholar
Schneider, William. 1978. Democrats and Republicans, Liberals and Conservatives. In Emerging Coalitions in American Politics, ed. Lipset, Seymour Martin. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara D. 1978. From Party Voting to Regional Fragmentation: The House of Representatives from 1933-1956. American Politics Quarterly 6:125–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James A. 1985. Repression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay. American Journal of Political Science 29:914–47.Google Scholar
Sundquist, James L. 1973. Dynamics of the Party System. Washington: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1984. The Decline of American Political Parties: 1952-1980. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.