Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:07:09.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do New Soviet Leaders Really Make a Difference? Rethinking the “Succession Connection”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1985

Philip G. Roeder
Philip G. Roeder*
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

According to an increasingly more widely held view, Leninist regimes tend to pump up mass-oriented policies during succession crises. Yet, this empirically based theory contains significant conceptual and methodological flaws, suggesting the need to reexamine the evidence and rethink the thesis. Using the Soviet evidence, a retest of its hypotheses fails to support this thesis. An alternative, consolidation connection is proposed here which considers the impact of political processes upon a General Secretary's capacity to innovate as well as his incentive structure. Tests of these hypotheses show a significantly higher rate of confirmation than the retest of the original thesis.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 79 , Issue 4 , December 1985 , pp. 958 - 976
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adomeit, H. Consensus versus conflict: The dimension of foreign policy. In Bialer, S. (Ed.). The domestic context of Soviet foreign policy. Boulder, Colo.: Westview, 1981.Google Scholar
Allison, G. The essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little, Brown, 1971.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1951.Google Scholar
Bialer, S. The Soviet political elite and internal developments in the USSR. In Griffith, W. (Ed.). The Soviet empire: Expansion and detente. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington, 1976.Google Scholar
Breslauer, G. Khrushchev reconsidered. Problems of Communism, 1976, 25, 18–33.Google Scholar
Breslauer, G. On the adaptability of Soviet welfare-state authoritarianism. In Ryavec, K. (Ed.). Soviet society and the communist party. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Breslauer, G. Khrushchev and Brezhnev as leaders: Building authority in Soviet politics. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1982.Google Scholar
Brown, A. Policy making in the Soviet Union. Soviet Studies, 1971, 23, 120–148.10.1080/09668137108410793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. Political developments: Some conclusions and an interpretation. In Brown, A. & Kaser, M. (Eds.). The Soviet Union since the fall of Khrushchev (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan, 1978.10.1007/978-1-349-15847-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. Leadership succession and policy innovation. In Brown, A. & Kaser, M. (Eds.). Soviet policy in the 1980s. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982.10.1007/978-1-349-16948-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. The Soviet succession: From Andropov to Chernenko. World Today, 1984, 40, 134–141.Google Scholar
Brunk, G., & Minehart, T. How important is elite turnover to policy change? American Journal of Political Science, 1984, 28, 559–569.10.2307/2110904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brzezinski, A., & Huntington, S. Political power: USA/USSR. New York: Viking, 1965.Google Scholar
Bunce, V. Elite succession, petrification, and policy innovation in Communist systems: An empirical assessment. Comparative Political Studies, 1976, 9, 3–41.10.1177/001041407600900101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, V. The succession connection: Policy cycles and political change in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. American Political Science Review, 1980, 74, 966–977.10.2307/1954316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, V. Do new leaders make a difference?: Executive succession and public policy under capitalism and socialism. Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1981.10.1515/9781400853359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, G. The United States Supreme Court and criminal cases, 1935-76: Alternative models of agenda building. British Journal of Political Science, 1981, 11, 449–470.10.1017/S000712340000274XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D. The expansion of the public economy: A comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 1978, 72, 1243–1261.10.2307/1954537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheek, S. Gubernatorial innovations. State Government, 1983, 56, 53–57.Google Scholar
Conquest, R. Power and policy In the U.S.S.R.: A study of Soviet dynasties. New York: Macmillan, 1962.Google Scholar
Cowart, A. The economic policies of European governments: Fiscal policy. British Journal of Political Science, 1978, 8, 425–439. (b)10.1017/S0007123400001484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowart, A. The economic policies of European governments: Monetary policy. British Journal of Political Science, 1978, 8, 285–311. (a)10.1017/S0007123400001381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czudnowski, M. Does who governs matter? Elite circulation in contemporary societies. De Kalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Dallin, A. Domestic factors influencing Soviet foreign policy. In Confino, M. & Shamir, S. (Eds.). The U.S.S.R. and the Middle East. New York: Wiley, 1973.Google Scholar
Daniels, R. Soviet politics since Khrushchev. In Strong, H. (Ed.). The Soviet Union under Brezhnev and Kosygin. New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold, 1971.Google Scholar
Esherick, J. & Perry, E. Leadership succession in the People's Republic of China: “Crisis” or opportunity? Studies in Comparative Communism, 1983, 16, 171–177.10.1016/0039-3592(83)90003-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedgut, T. Political participation in the USSR. Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Hammer, D. USSR: The politics of oligarchy. New York: Praeger, 1974.Google Scholar
Hermann, C. Decision structure and process influences on foreign policy. In East, M., Salmore, S., & Hermann, C. (Eds.). Why nations act. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1978.Google Scholar
Hess, S. Portrait of a president. Woodrow Wilson Quarterly, 1977, 1, 38–48.Google Scholar
Hibbs, D. Political parties and macro-economic policy. American Political Science Review, 1977, 71, 467–487.10.2307/1961490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, J. The bureaucratic model and the nature of the Soviet system. Journal of Comparative Administration, 1973, 5, 13–67.10.1177/009539977300500202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, J. The Brezhnev era: The man and the system. Problems of Communism, 1976, 25, 1–17.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. The common defense. New York: Columbia University Press, 1961.10.7312/hunt93234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, R. Soviet economic development (2nd ed.). New York: New York University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Inkeles, A. The totalitarian mystique: Some impressions of the dynamics of totalitarian society. In Friedrich, C. J. (Ed.). Totalitarianism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. What's wrong with Chinese political studies? Asian Survey, 1982, 22, 919–933.10.2307/2643752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linden, C. A. Khrushchev and the Soviet leadership, 1956-1964. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Lowi, T. American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory. World Politics, 1964, 16, 677–715.10.2307/2009452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, D. S. Policy dilemmas and political unrest in Poland. Journal of Politics, 1983, 45, 397–421.10.2307/2130132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, D. Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Mills, R. The Soviet political leadership. World Politics, 1981, 33, 590–613.10.2307/2010136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neustadt, R. Presidential politics. New York: Wiley, 1960.Google Scholar
Nove, A. An economic history of the U.S.S.R. New York: Penguin, 1982.Google Scholar
Osborn, R. The evolution of Soviet politics. Home-wood, Ill.: Dorsey, 1974.Google Scholar
Pethybridge, R. A key to Soviet politics: The crisis of the ‘anti-party’ group. London: Allen and Unwin, 1962.Google Scholar
Pistrak, L. The grand tactician: Khrushchev's rise to power. New York: Praeger, 1961.Google Scholar
Ploss, S. Conflict and decision-making in Soviet Russia: A case study of agricultural policy, 1953-1965. Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1965.10.1515/9781400875221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigby, T. The Soviet leadership: Towards a self-stabilizing oligarchy? Soviet Studies, 1970, 22, 167–191.10.1080/09668137008410748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeder, P. Soviet policies and Kremlin politics. International Studies Quarterly, 1984, 171–194.10.2307/2600694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rush, M. Political succession in the USSR (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Rush, M. How communist states change their rulers. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Russia. Tsentral'noe statisticheskoe upravlenie. Narod-noe Khoziaistvo SSSR za 19—g. Moscow: Statistika, various years.Google Scholar
Ryavec, K. The Soviet leadership succession: Change and uncertainty. Polity, 1982, 15, 103–122.10.2307/3234596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling, W., Hammond, P. & Snyder, G. Strategy, politics, and defense budgets. New York: Columbia University Press, 1962.10.7312/schi92976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, J. Ambition and politics. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D. (Ed.). Resolutions and decisions of the Communist party of the Soviet Union: The Brezhnev years. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J., & Keech, W. R. Group influence and the policy process in the Soviet Union. American Political Science Review, 1968, 62, 840–851.10.2307/1953434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shishko, R. Defense budget interactions revisited. RAND Study P5882. Santa Monica: RAND, 1977.Google Scholar
Siegel, R., & Weinberg, L. Comparing public policies. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Slusser, R. America, China, and the hydra-headed opposition: The dynamics of Soviet foreign policy. In Juviler, P. & Morton, H. (Eds.). Soviet policymaking: Studies of Communism in transition. New York: Praeger, 1967.Google Scholar
Smith, T. The comparative policy process. Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-Clio Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Tufte, E. Political control of the economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1978.10.1515/9780691219417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zobota partii i pravitel'stva o blage naroda: sbornik dokumentov (oktiabr' 1964-1973). Moscow: Izdatel' stvo Politicheskoi Literatury, 1974.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.