Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Tucker, Joshua A.
2002.
THEFIRSTDECADE OFPOST-COMMUNISTELECTIONS ANDVOTING: What Have We Studied, and How Have We Studied It?.
Annual Review of Political Science,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 1,
p.
271.
Konitzer-Smirnov, Andrew
2003.
Incumbent Electoral Fortunes and Regional Economic Performance during Russia's 2000-2001 Regional Executive Election Cycle.
Post-Soviet Affairs,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
46.
KONITZER-SMIRNOV, ANDREW
2003.
Jurisdictional Voting in Russia's Regions: Initial Results from Individual-level Analyses.
Europe-Asia Studies,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 1,
p.
133.
Gomez, Brad T.
and
Wilson, J. Matthew
2003.
Causal Attribution and Economic Voting in American Congressional Elections.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 3,
p.
271.
Duch, Raymond M.
and
Stevenson, Randy
2005.
Context and the Economic Vote: A Multilevel Analysis.
Political Analysis,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 4,
p.
387.
Tavits, Margit
2005.
The Development of Stable Party Support: Electoral Dynamics in Post‐Communist Europe.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 49,
Issue. 2,
p.
283.
Gerring, John
Bond, Philip
Barndt, William T.
and
Moreno, Carola
2005.
Democracy and Economic Growth: A Historical Perspective.
World Politics,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 3,
p.
323.
Hale, Henry E.
2005.
Why Not Parties in Russia?.
Zielinski, Jakub
Slomczynski, Kazimierz M.
and
Shabad, Goldie
2005.
Electoral Control in New Democracies: The Perverse Incentives of Fluid Party Systems.
World Politics,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 3,
p.
365.
Gomez, Brad T.
and
Wilson, J. Matthew
2006.
Cognitive Heterogeneity and Economic Voting: A Comparative Analysis of Four Democratic Electorates.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 1,
p.
127.
Tavits, Margit
and
Annus, Taavi
2006.
Learning to make votes count: The role of democratic experience.
Electoral Studies,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 1,
p.
72.
KALTENTHALER, KARL C.
CECCOLI, TEPHEN J.
and
MICHTA, ANDREW
2006.
Explaining individual‐level support for privatization in European post‐Soviet economies.
European Journal of Political Research,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Lewis‐Beck, Michael S.
and
Stegmaier, Mary
2008.
The Economic Vote in Transitional Democracies.
Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 3,
p.
303.
Lebo, Matthew J.
and
Box‐Steffensmeier, Janet M.
2008.
Dynamic Conditional Correlations in Political Science.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 3,
p.
688.
Healy, Andrew J.
2008.
How Voters Reward Transfers Compared to Competence: Explaining Pocketbook Voting.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Roberts, Andrew
2008.
Hyperaccountability: Economic voting in Central and Eastern Europe.
Electoral Studies,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 3,
p.
533.
Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.
2008.
Policy-based voting, perceptions of issue space, and the 2000 Mexican elections.
Electoral Studies,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 4,
p.
649.
Singer, Matthew M.
and
Stephenson, Laura B.
2009.
The political context and Duverger's theory: Evidence at the district level.
Electoral Studies,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 3,
p.
480.
Pacek, Alexander C.
Pop-Eleches, Grigore
and
Tucker, Joshua A.
2009.
Disenchanted or Discerning: Voter Turnout in Post-Communist Countries.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 71,
Issue. 2,
p.
473.
STEGMAIER, MARY
and
LEWIS‐BECK, MICHAEL S.
2009.
Learning the Economic Vote: Hungarian Forecasts, 1998‐2010.
Politics & Policy,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 4,
p.
769.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.