Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T07:44:32.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Developmental Model of Heterogeneous Economic Voting in New Democracies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2017

Raymond M. Duch*
Affiliation:
University of Houston

Abstract

I argue that information and trust in nascent democratic institutions are two important sources of heterogeneity in economic voting in transition democracies. Economic voting develops in postcommunist electorates as ambiguity regarding the link between government policy and economic outcomes declines. The link becomes less ambiguous as citizens become more informed about how democratic institutions function and gain increasing confidence or trust in the responsiveness of these institutions to public preferences. In the early period of democratization the conditions necessary for an effective agency relationship between voter and incumbent are not yet fully developed. Economic voting increases as these levels of information on, and trust in, government rise. The analysis that tests these propositions is based on a public opinion survey conducted in Hungary in 1997. The test is replicated with a 1997 Polish election survey.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buendia Laredo, Jorge. 1996. “Economic Reform, Public Opinion and Presidential Approval in Mexico, 1988–1993.” Comparative Political Studies 29 (October): 566-92. “Public Support for Emerging Democracies,” special issue, ed. Stokes, Susan C..Google Scholar
Bruszt, Laszlo, Simon, Janos, and Wessels, Bernard. 1993. Codebook of the International Survey on “Political Culture, Political and Economic Orientations in Central and Eastern Europe during Transition to Democracy 1990–1992.” Budapest: Erasmus Foundation for Democracy.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, Feldman, Stanley, and Knight, Kathleen. 1986. “Judging Inflation and Unemployment: The Origins of Retrospective Evaluations.” Journal of Politics 48 (August): 565-88.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry 1996. “Democracy in Latin America: Degrees, Illusions, and Directions for Consolidation.” In Beyond Sovereignty: Collectively Defending Democracy in the America, ed. Farer, Tom. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Pp. 52104.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry, and Linz, Juan. 1989. “Introduction: Politics, Society, and Democracy in Latin America.” In Latin America, vol. 4 of Democracy in Developing Countries, ed. Diamond, Larry, Linz, Juan J., and Lipset, Seymour Martin. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. Pp. 158.Google Scholar
Dominguez, Jorge I., and McCann, James A.. 1996. Democratizing Mexico: Public Opinion and Electoral Choices. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Duch, Raymond M. 1993, “Tolerating Economic Reform: Popular Support for Transition to a Free Market in the Former Soviet Union.” American Political Science Review 87 (September): 590608.Google Scholar
Duch, Raymond M. 1995. “Economic Chaos and the Fragility of Democratic Transition in Former Communist Regimes.” Journal of Politics 57 (February): 121-58.Google Scholar
Duch, Raymond, M. 1998. “The Electoral Connection and Democratic Transition.” Electoral Studies 17 (2): 149-74.Google Scholar
Duch, Raymond M., Palmer, Harvey D., and Anderson, Christopher J.. 2000. “Heterogeneity in Perceptions of National Economic Conditions.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (4): 635-49.Google Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey, and Whitefield, Stephen. 1993. “Identifying the Bases of Party Competition in Eastern Europe.” British Journal of Political Science 23 (October): 521-48.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, ed. Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 5597.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1986. “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control.” Public Choice 50 (Fall): 525.Google Scholar
Finifter, Ada, and Mickiewicz, Ellen. 1992. “Redefining the Political System of the USSR: Mass Support for Political Change.” American Political Science Review 86 (December): 857-74.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. 1978. “Economic Retrospective Voting in American National Elections: A Micro-Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 22 (May): 426-43.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Goidel, Robert K., and Langley, Ronald E.. 1995. “Media Coverage of the Economy and Aggregate Economic Evaluations: Uncovering Evidence of Indirect Media Effects.” Political Research Quarterly 48 (June): 291312.Google Scholar
Goodhart, Charles A. E., and Bhansali, R. J.. 1970. “Political Economy.” Political Studies 18 (March): 43106.Google Scholar
Greene, William H. 1999. Econometric Analysis, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haller, Brandon H., and Norpoth, Helmut. 1995. “News and Opinion: The Economy and the American Voter.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. 1996. “The Media's Role in Forming Voters’ National Economic Evaluations in 1992.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (May): 372-95.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. 1998. “The Political Relevance of Political Trust.” American Political Science Review 92 (December): 791808.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. 1999. “The Effect of Political Trust on the Presidential Vote, 1968–96.” American Political Science Review 93 (June): 311-26.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Douglas. 1982The Dynamics of Political Support for American Presidents among Occupational Groups.” American Journal of Political Science 26 (May): 312-32.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Thomas, and Garand, James C.. 1996. “Homo Economus? Economic Information and Economic Voting.” Political Research Quarterly 49 (June): 351-75.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, et al. 2000. World Values Surveys and European Values Surveys, 1981–1984, 1990–1993, and 1995–1997 [computer file] (Study #2790). ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research [producer]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].Google Scholar
Jones, Bradford S., Willerton, John P., and Sobel, Michael E.. 1998. “Direction and Intensity of Russian Macroeconomic Evaluations.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert R., and Zuckerman, Leo. 1998. “Attitudes toward Economic Reform in Mexico: The Role of Political Orientations.” American Political Science Review 92 (June): 359-75.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason. 1998. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Roderick Kiewiet, D.. 1979. “Economic Grievances and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Discontents and Collective Judgements in Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 23 (August): 495527.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Roderick Kiewiet, D.. 1981. “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.” British Journal of Political Science 11 (April): 129-61.Google Scholar
Kramer, Gerald H. 1971. “Short-Term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896–1964.” American Political Science Review 65 (March): 131-43.Google Scholar
Krause, George A. 1997. “Voters, Information Heterogeneity, and the Dynamics of Aggregate Economic Expectations.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (October): 170200.Google Scholar
Lanoue, David J. 1994. “Retrospective and Prospective Voting in Presidential-Year Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 47 (1): 193205.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Crisis, Breakdown, and Reequilibration. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1992. “Peasants or Bankers?: The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy.” American Political Science Review 86 (September): 597611.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael B., and Mouw, Calvin. 1995. “Class and Competence in the Political Economy.” Political Science Department, University of Missouri, St. Louis. Typescript.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard, Przeworski, Adam, and Stokes, Susan C.. 1999. “Introduction” to Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 126.Google Scholar
Markowski, Radoslaw, and Toka, Gabor. 1998. “Left Turn in Poland and Hungary Five Years after the Collapse of Communism.” Sisyphus 1 (9): 7599.Google Scholar
Mateju, Petr, Rehakova, Blanka, and Evans, Geoffrey. 1999. “The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context.” In New Class Politics of Post-Communism, ed. Evans, Geoffrey. New York: Oxford University Press, Pp. 231-53.Google Scholar
Mishler, William, and Rose, Richard. 1994. “Support for Parliaments and Regimes in the Transition Toward Democracy in Post-Communist Europe.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 19 (1): 532.Google Scholar
Mischler, William, and Rose, Richard. 1996. “Trajectories of Fear and Hope: Support for Democracy in Post-Communist Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 28 (4): 553-81.Google Scholar
Mishler, William, and Rose, Richard. 1997. “Trust, Distrust and Skepticism: Popular Evaluations of Civil and Political Institutions in Post-Communist Societies.” Journal of Politics 59 (May): 418-51.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott, and Zechmeister, Elizabeth, 2001. “Better the Devil You Know than the Saint You Don't?Journal of Politics 63 (February): 93119.Google Scholar
Morlang, Diana. 1999. “Competing Constituencies: Using Economic Reform to Build a Future Support Base.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Nannestad, Peter, and Paldam, Peter. 1994. “The VP-Function: A Survey of the Literature on Vote and Popularity Functions after 25 Years.” Public Choice 79 (June): 213-45.Google Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut. 1996. “Presidents and the Prospective Voter.” Journal of Politics 58 (August): 776-92.Google Scholar
Pacek, Alexander C. 1994. “Macroeconomic Conditions and Electoral Politics in East Central Europe.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (August): 723-44.Google Scholar
Paldam, Martin. 1991. “How Robust Is the Vote Function? A Study of Seventeen Nations over Four Decades.” In Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support, ed. Northop, Helmuth, Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Lafay, Jean-Dominique. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Pp. 931.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham, and Whitten, Guy D.. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (May): 391414.Google Scholar
Powers, Denise V., and Cox, James H.. 1997. “Echoes from the Past: The Relationship between Satisfaction with Economic Reforms and Voting Behavior in Poland.” American Political Science Review 91 (September): 617-33.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reform in Eastern Europe and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1995. Sustainable Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1996. “Public Support for Economic Reforms in Poland.” Comparative Political Studies 29 (October): 520-44. “Public Support for Emerging Democracies,” special issue, ed. Stokes, Susan C..Google Scholar
Racz, Barnabas. 2000. “The Hungarian Socialists in Opposition: Stagnation or Renaissance.” Europe-Asia Studies 52 (2): 319-47.Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen L. 1991. “The Political Impact of Economic Crisis in Latin America in the 1980s.” American Political Science Review 85 (September): 777800.Google Scholar
Rivers, Douglas. 1998. “Heterogeneity in Models of Electoral Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 32 (August): 737-57.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard, Mishler, William, and Haerpfer, Christian. 1997. Getting Real: Social Capital in Post-Communists Societies. Studies in Public Policy Monograph. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.Google Scholar
Shabad, Goldie. 1999. “Political Identities in the Initial Phase of Systemic Transformation in Poland: A Test of the Tabula Rasa Hypothesis.” Comparative Political Studies 28 (September): 690723.Google Scholar
Smith, Renée. 1998. “Exposure, Acceptance, and Economic Information: Understanding Change in Citizens’ Views of the American Economy.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1973. “General Economic Conditions and National Elections.” American Economic Review 63 (May): 160-7.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 1996. “Economic Reform and Public Opinion in Peru, 1990–1995.” Comparative Political Studies 29 (October): 544-66. “Public Support for Emerging Democracies,” special issue, ed. Stokes, Susan C..Google Scholar
Suzuki, Motoshi. 1992Political Business Cycles in the Public Mind.” American Political Science Review 86 (December): 989-96.Google Scholar
Toka, Gabor. 1996. “Parties and Electoral Choices in East-Central Europe.” In Stabilising Fragile Democracies: Comparing New Party Systems in Southern and Eastern Europe, ed. Pridham, Geoffrey and Lewis, Paul G.. London: Routledge. Pp. 100-25.Google Scholar
Toka, Gabor. 1994. “Who Is Satisfied with Democracy?” In Democratic Legitimacy in Post-Communist Societies, ed. Andras Bozoki. Budapest: T-TWINS.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary. 1999. CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results: Version 1.2.1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. http://gking.harvard.edu/ (accessed June 1, 2001).Google Scholar
Tucker, Joshua A. 1999a. “It's the Economy, Comrade! A Model of the Effect of Economic Conditions on Election Results in Transition Countries.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Tucker, Joshua A. 1999b. “Reconsidering Economic Voting: Party Type vs. Incumbency in Transition Countries.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Weatherford, M. Stephen. 1983. “Economic Voting and the “Symbolic Politics” Argument: A Reinterpretation and Synthesis.” American Political Science Review 77 (March): 917-38.Google Scholar
Whitten, Guy D., and Palmer, Harvey D.. 1999. “Cross-National Analyses of Economic Voting.” Electoral Studies 18 (March): 4967.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 2001. “Know-Nothing Voters in U.S. Presidential Elections, 1948 to 1996.” Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, http://www.ssc.net.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/zaller (accessed August 5, 2001).Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.