Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-04T23:35:57.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

David Hume’s Balancing Act: The Political Discourses and the Sinews of War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2020

DANIELLE CHARETTE Open the ORCID record for DANIELLE CHARETTE [Opens in a new window]
DANIELLE CHARETTE*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
*
Danielle Charette, PhD Candidate, Committee on Social Thought, University of Chicago, [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Both champions and critics of “neorealism” in contemporary international relations misinterpret David Hume as an early spokesman for a universal and scientific balance-of-power theory. This article instead treats Hume’s “Of the Balance of Power,” alongside the other essays in his Political Discourses (1752), as conceptual resources for a historically inflected analysis of state balancing. Hume’s defense of the balance of power cannot be divorced from his critique of commercial warfare in “Of the Balance of Trade” and “Of the Jealousy of Trade.” To better appreciate Hume’s historical and economic approach to foreign policy, this article places Hume in conversation with Machiavelli, Guicciardini, Andrew Fletcher, and Montesquieu. International relations scholars suspicious of static paradigms should reconsider Hume’s genealogy of the balance of power, which differs from the standard liberal and neorealist accounts. Well before International Political Economy developed as a formal subdiscipline, Hume was conceptually treating economics and power politics in tandem.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 115 , Issue 1 , February 2021 , pp. 69 - 81
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I owe special thanks to Richard Boyd, Ryan Hanley, Joel Isaac, John McCormick, Thomas Merrill, Sankar Muthu, Jennifer Pitts, Pete Rodrigue, Andrew Sabl, Blake Smith, Nathan Tarcov, Adam Woodhouse, and Samuel Garrett Zeitlin for their feedback on earlier drafts of this article. I am also grateful to this journal’s three anonymous reviewers and to the audiences at the University of Chicago Political Theory Workshop, the 46th International Hume Society Conference, and the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting in 2019.

References

Ahn, Doohwan. 2011. “From ‘Jealous Emulation’ to ‘Cautious Politics’: British Foreign Policy and Public Discourse in the Mirror of Ancient Athens (1730–1750).” In Ideology and Foreign Policy in Early Modern Europe (1650–1750), eds. Onnekink, David and Rommelse, Gijs, 93–130. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Andersen, Morton Skumsrud. 2018. “Balance of Power.” In The Encyclopedia of Diplomacy. Vol. 1, ed. Chichester, Gordon Martel., UK: Wiley-Blackwell. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/9781118885154.dipl0339.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.S. 1970. “Eighteenth-Century Theories of the Balance of Power.” In Studies in Diplomatic History: Essays in Memory of David Bayne Horne, eds. Hatton, Ragnhild and Anderson, M. S., 183–98. Hamden, CT: Archon Books.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. [1962] 1966. Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations, trans. Howard, Richard and Fox, Annette Baker. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Ashley, Richard K. 1984. “The Poverty of Neorealism.” International Organization 38 (2): 225–86.10.1017/S0020818300026709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumstark, Moritz. 2010. “Hume’s Reading of the Classics at Ninewells, 1749–51.” The Journal of Scottish Philosophy 8 (1): 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbon, Nicholas. [1690] 1905. A Discourse of Trade. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Beckford, William. [1752] 1813. “Debate in the Commons on the Subsidy to the Elector of Saxony” (January 22, 1752). In The Parliamentary History of England, from the Earliest Period to the Year 1803, vol. 14, ed. Cobbett, William, col. 1132–74. London: T. C. Hansard.Google Scholar
Black, Jeremy. 2004. Parliament and Foreign Policy in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolingbroke, Henry St John (first viscount of). 1727. The Occasional Writer, No. II. London: Printed for A. Moore.Google Scholar
Bolingbroke, Henry St John (first viscount of). 1748. A Collection of Political Tracts. London: Printed for R. Francklin.Google Scholar
Brewer, John. 1989. The Sinews of Power: War, Money, and the English State 1688–1783. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Brooke, Christopher. 2017. “Eighteenth-Century Carthage.” In Commerce and Peace in the Enlightenment, eds. Kapossy, Béla, Nakhimovsky, Isaac, and Whatmore, Richard, 110–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert. [1966] 1996. “The Balance of Power.” In Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, eds. Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin, 132–48. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert, and Wight, Martin. [1966] 1996. “Preface.” In Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, eds. Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin, 11–13. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chesterfield, Philip Dormer Stanhope (fourth earl of). 1744. Natural Reflexions on the Present Conduct of His Prussian Majesty. London: M. Cooper.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert. 1981. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Theory.” Millennium 10 (2): 126–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, Mette. 2009. “The End of Balance-of-Power Theory? A Comment on Wohlforth et al.’s ‘Testing Balance of Power in World History.’” European Journal of International Relations 15 (2): 347–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, Andrew [1698] 1997a. “A Discourse of Government with Relation to Militias.” In Political Works, ed. Robertson, John, 1–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Andrew. [1703] 1997b. “An Account of a Conversation Concerning a Right Regulation of Governments for the Common Good of Mankind.” In Political Works, ed. Robertson, John, 175–215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Andrew. [1703] 1997c. “Speeches by a Member of Parliament which began at Edinburgh the 6th of May, 1703.” In Political Works, ed. Robertson, John, 129–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
George II, King of Great Britain. [1740] 1812. “The King’s Speech on Opening the Session.” (November 18, 1740). In Corbett’s Parliamentary History of England, from the Norman Conquest in 1066 to the Year 1803, vol. 11, ed. Cobbett, William, col. 610–13. London: T. C. Hansard.Google Scholar
Giarrizzo, Giuseppe. 1962. David Hume Politico e Storico. Turin: Giulio Einaudi.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1975. U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation. New York: Basic Books.10.1007/978-1-349-01354-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1984. “The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism.” International Organization 38: (2): 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guicciardini, Francesco. [1537] 1969. The History of Italy, trans. Alexander, Sidney. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano. 1998. Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1953. “The Balance of Power: Prescription, Conscript, or Propaganda.” World Politics 5 (4): 422–77.10.2307/2009179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halifax, George Montagu Dunk (second earl of). [1744] 1812. “Debate in the Lords on a Resolution Respecting Hanoverian Troops.” (January 31, 1744). In The Parliamentary History of England, from the Earliest Period to the Year 1803, vol. 13, ed. Cobbett, William, col. 552–631. London: T. C. Hansard.Google Scholar
Harris, Robert. 1993. A Patriot Press: National Politics and the London Press in the 1740s. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, James. 2015. Hume: An Intellectual Biography. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, Jonathan. 2002. No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations Since Machiavelli. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hollis, Martin, and Smith, Steve. 1990. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan. 1993. “The Rhapsody of Public Debt: David Hume and Voluntary State Bankruptcy.” In Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain, eds. Phillipson, Nicholas and Skinner, Quentin, 321–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511659980.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hont, Istvan. 2005. Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan. 2010. “Hume’s Knaves and the Shadow of Machiavellianism.” Paper presented at the Anti-Machiavellian Machiavellianism Conference, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
Hulliung, Mark. 1976. Montesquieu and the Old Regime. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David. [1741] 1994a. “Of Civil Liberty.” In Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene F., 87–96. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. [1742] 1994b. “Of Refinement in the Arts.” In Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene F., 268–80. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. [1748] 1994c. “Of the Protestant Succession.” In Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene F., 502–11. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. [1752] 1994d. “Idea of a Perfect Commonwealth.” In Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene F., 512–29. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. [1752] 1994e. “Of the Balance of Power.” In Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene F., 332–41. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.10.1017/CBO9781139170765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. [1752] 1994f. “Of the Balance of Trade.” In Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene F., 308–26. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. [1752] 1994g. “Of Commerce.” In Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene F., 253–67. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. [1752] 1994h. “Of Interest.” In Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene F., 295–307. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. [1752] 1994i. “Of Money.” In Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene F., 281–94. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.10.1017/CBO9781139170765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. [1752] 1994j. “Of Public Credit.” In Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene F., 349–65. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. [1758] 1994k. “Of the Jealousy of Trade.” In Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene F., 327–31. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.10.1017/CBO9781139170765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1932. The Letters of David Hume. 2 vols., ed. Grieg, J.Y.T.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David. [1754–62] 1983. The History of England. 6 vols., Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hume, David. n.d. “Untitled Notes on Several Subjects.” National Library of Scotland 23159, item 14. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Nye, Richard S.. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Knutsen, Torbjøn L. 2016. A History of International Relations Theory. 3rd edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kurki, Milja. 2008. Causation in International Relations: Reclaiming Causal Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurki, Milja. 2006. “Causes of a Divided Discipline: Rethinking the Concept of Cause in International Relations Theory.” Review of International Studies 32 (2): 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2008. “Sociological Approaches.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, eds. Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan, 446–61. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2011. The Puzzle of Politics: Inquiries into the Genesis and Transformation of International Relations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2018. Praxis: On Acting and Knowing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 2005. “What Do Great Powers Balance Against and When?” In Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century, eds. Paul, T. V., James, J. Wirtz, and Fortmann, Michael, 29–51. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S., and Thompson, William. 2005. “Hegemonic Threats and Great-Power Balancing in Europe, 1495–1999.” Security Studies 14 (1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, Richard. 2007. The Balance of Power in International Relations: Relations, Metaphors, Myths, and Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livy. [27–9 BCE] 1938. History of Rome, Volume XII, trans. Sage, Evan and Schlesinger, Alfred. Loeb Classical Library 332. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. [1513–17] 1996. Discourses on Livy, trans. Mansfield, Harvey and Tarcov, Nathan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, Iain. 2017. “Peace, Commerce and Cosmopolitan Republicanism: The Legacy of Andrew Fletcher in Late-Eighteenth-Century Scotland.” In Commerce and Peace in the Enlightenment, eds. Kapossy, Béla, Nakhimovsky, Isaac, and Whatmore, Richard, 192–215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melon, Jean-François. 1734. Essai politique sur le commerce. France.Google Scholar
Miller, Jon. 2013. “Hume’s Citation of Strabo and the Dating of the Memoranda.” Hume Studies 37 (2): 197–202.Google Scholar
Molloy, Seán. 2006. The Hidden History of Realism: A Genealogy of Power Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molloy, Seán. 2013. “‘Cautious Politics’: Morgenthau and Hume’s Critiques of the Balance of Power.” International Politics 50 (6): 768–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles De Secondat. [1734] 2000. “ Considérations sur les causes de la grandeur des Romains et de leur decadence. ” In Œuvres complètes de Montesquieu, Vol. 2. [Reflections on the Causes and the Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire], eds. Weil, Françoise and Courtney, Cecil P.. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles De Secondat. [1748] 1989. Spirit of the Laws, trans. Cohler, Anne M., Miller, Basia C., and Stone, Harold Samuel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1948. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Mossner, Ernest Campbell. 1948. “Hume’s Early Memoranda, 1729–40.” Journal of the History of Ideas 9 (4): 492–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nexon, Daniel H. 2009. “Review: The Balance of Power in the Balance.” World Politics 61 (2): 330–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, David, Norton, Fate, and Norton, Mary J.. 1996. The David Hume Library. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Bibliographical Society.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S.. 1993. Understanding International Conflicts: An Introduction to Theory and History. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. [1979] 1985. “Hume and the American Revolution: The Dying Thoughts of a North Briton.” In Virtue, Commerce, and History: Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century, 125–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patomäki, Heikki. 2007. “Back to the Kantian ‘Idea for a Universal History’? Overcoming Eurocentric Accounts of the International Problematic.” Millennium 35 (3): 575–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patomäki, Heikki, and Wight, Colin. 2000. “After Postpositivism? The Promises of Critical Realism.” International Studies Quarterly 44: 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahe, Paul. 2005. “The Book that Never Was: Montesquieu’s ‘Considerations on the Romans’ in Historical Context.” History of Political Thought 26 (1): 43–89.Google Scholar
Rahe, Paul. 2009. Montesquieu and the Logic of Liberty. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, John. 1983. “The Scottish Enlightenment at the Limits of the Civic Tradition.” In Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of the Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment, eds. Hont, Istvan and Ignatieff, Michael, 137–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, John. 1985. The Scottish Enlightenment and the Militia Issue. Edinburgh: John Donald.Google Scholar
Robertson, John. 1993. “Universal Monarchy and the Liberties of Europe.” In Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain, eds. Phillipson, Nicholas and Skinner, Quentin, 349–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, John. 1995. “An Elusive Sovereignty. The Course of the Union Debate in Scotland 1698–1707.” In A Union for Empire: Political Thought and the British Union of 1707, ed. Robertson, John, 198–227. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, John. 1997. “Introduction.” In Andrew Fletcher: Political Works, ed. Robertson, John, ix–xxx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Emma. 2009. “The Atlantic Worlds of David Hume.” In Soundings in Atlantic History: Latent Structures and Intellectual currents, 1500–1830, eds. Bailyn, Bernard and Denault, Patricia D., 405–48. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Emma. 2009. “The Atlantic Worlds of David Hume.” In Soundings in Atlantic History: Latent Structures and Intellectual currents, 1500–1830, eds. Bernard Bailyn and Patricia D. Denault, 405–448. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sakamoto, Tatsuya. 2011. “Hume ‘Early Memoranda’ and the Making of His Political Economy.” Hume Studies 39 (2): 197–202.Google Scholar
Seabury, Paul. 1965. Balance of Power. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing.Google Scholar
Shackleton, Robert. 1964. “Montesquieu and Machiavelli: A Reappraisal.” Comparative Literature Studies 1 (1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michael. 1996. The Balance of Power: History and Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Simms, Brendan. 2007. “‘Ministers of Europe’: British Strategic Culture, 1714–1760.” In Cultures of Power in Europe during the Long Eighteenth Century, eds. Scott, Hamish and Simms, Brendan, 110–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sonenscher, Michael. 2007. Before the Deluge: Public Debt, Inequality, and the Intellectual Origins of the French Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, Céline. 2006. “Montesquieu, l’Europe et les nouvelles figures de l’empire.” Revue Montesquieu 8: 17–42.Google Scholar
Spector, Céline. 2010. Montesquieu: Pouvoirs, Richesses et Sociétés. Paris: Hermann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, M.A. 2000. “The Dating of Hume’s Manuscripts.” In The Scottish Enlightenment: Essays in Reinterpretation, ed. Wood, Paul, 267–314. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Van de Haar, Edwin. 2008. “David Hume and International Political Theory: A Reappraisal.” Review of International Studies 34 (2): 225–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasquez, John A. 1986. Classics of International Relations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A. 1997. “The Realist Paradigm and Degenerative versus Progressive Research Programs: An Appraisal of Neotraditional Research on Waltz’s Balancing Proposition.” American Political Science Review 91 (4): 899–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasquez, John A., and Colmin, Elman. 2003. Realism and the Balancing of Power: A New Debate. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. [1954] 2001. Man, the State, and War. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin. 1991. International Theory: The Three Traditions. Leicester, UK: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Wennerlind, Carl. 2008. “An Artificial Virtue and the Oil of Commerce: A Synthetic View of Hume’s Theory of Money.” Chap. 7 in David Hume’s Political Economy, eds. Schabas, Margaret and Wennerlind, Carl, 105–26. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Whelan, Frederick. 2004. Hume and Machiavelli: Political Realism and Liberal Thought. Latham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Whelan, Frederick. 1995. “Robertson, Hume, and the Balance of Power.” Hume Studies 21 (2): 315–32.Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William, Little, Richard, Kaufman, Stuart J., Kang, David, Jones, Charles A., Hui, Victoria Tin-Bor, Eckstein, Arthur, et al. 2007. “Testing Balance-of-Power Theory in World History.” European Journal of International Relations 13 (2): 155–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.