Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:46:30.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Culturalist Theory of Political Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Harry Eckstein
Harry Eckstein*
Affiliation:
University of California Irvine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The most telling criticism of political culture theory is that it has coped very inadequately with political change. There is a good reason for this: the assumptions of the political culture approach in fact lead to the expectation of continuity. But continuity can be reconciled with changes, though only changes of particular kinds. The nature of political changes consistent with culturalist assumptions and with the culturalist expectation of continuity are here specified by hypotheses about (1) the effects of changes in social context, whether “normal” or involving abrupt discontinuity, and (2) the effects of attempted revolutionary transformation.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 82 , Issue 3 , September 1988 , pp. 789 - 804
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1988 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, Gabriel A., and Coleman, James S.. 1960. The Politics of the Developing Areas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A., and Bingham Powell, G.. 1966. Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A., and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A., and Verba, Sidney, eds. 1979. The Civil Culture Revisited. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1963. On Revolution. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Benedict, Ruth. 1934. Patterns of Culture. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Bill, James, and Hardgrave, Robert L.. 1973. Comparative Politics: The Quest For Theory. Columbus: Merrill.Google Scholar
Brehm, Jack W., and Cohen, Arthur R.. 1962. Explorations in Cognitive Dissonance. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Brinton, Crane. 1965. The Anatomy of Revolution. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. 1923. Reflections on the French Revolution. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Crozier, Michel. 1964. The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dawson, Richard E., and Prewitt, Kenneth. 1969. Political Socialization. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. 1957. American Notes & Pictures from Italy. London: Oxford.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1960. The Division of Labor in Society. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1979a. Support for Regimes. Research Monograph no. 44. Princeton: Center of International Studies.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1979b. On the “Science” of the State. Daedalus 108 (4): 1–20.Google Scholar
Edwards, Lyford P. 1927. The Natural History of Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goodenough, Ward Hunt. 1968. Description and Comparison in Cultural Anthropology. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted R. 1974. Persistence and Change in Political Systems. American Political Science Review. 68: 1482–1504.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Jonathan and Klein, Herbert S.. 1981. Revolution and the Rebirth of Inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kluckhohn, Clyde. 1962. Culture and Behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. 1960. Political Man. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1944. A Scientific Theory of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Massell, Gregory. 1974. The Surrogate Proletariat. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mead, Margaret, and Metraux, Rhoda. 1954. Themes from French Culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Merkl, Peter H. 1970. Modem Comparative Politics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1949. Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur Jr. 1963. Rapid Economic Growth as a Destabilizing Force. Journal of Economic History 23:529–52.Google Scholar
Park, Robert E. 1937. Introduction to The Marginal Man, by Stonequist, E. V.. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1937. Toward a General Theory of Action. New York: McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott, and Shils, Edward A., eds. 1951. Toward a General Theory of Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert B. 1973. The Beliefs of Politicians. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pye, Lucian W., and Verba, Sidney. 1965. Political Culture and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rejai, Mustafa, and Phillips, Kay. 1979. Leaders of Revolutions. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald. 1974. Rational Legitimacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, George. 1950. The Sociology of George Simmel. Trans. K. Wolf. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sumner, William Graham. 1906. Folkways. Boston: Ginn.Google Scholar
Tyler, Edward Burnett. 1871. Primitive Culture. 2 vols. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Wakeford, John. 1969. The Cloistered Bite. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Whitaker, C. Sylvester. 1970. The Politics of Tradition: Continuity and Change in Northern Nigeria 1946–1966. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric R. 1973. Peasant Wars in the Twentieth Century. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Woods, Peter. 1979. The Divided School. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.