No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2013
Of all criticisms of the New Deal, the one most frequently emphasized is the lack of coördination. Headlessness in policy-framing and sprawling aimlessness in policy execution are twin charges which the Administration has been forced to admit. The recent report of the President's Committee on Administrative Management is an indication that the Administration intends to leave to posterity a good record on this score; but both practitioners and students of government are well aware that no reorganization can be so complete, so perfect in its functional allotment of duties to departments, that the problem of horizontal integration will not still need to be faced and solved. This reminder is less an apologia than an indication of the frame of reference of the present note; those who have been administering the government for the past four years have never been unaware of the need for concerted action among the executive departments, and many attempts have been made to achieve it. A device often employed for the purpose has been the interdepartmental committee.
1 Willoughby, W. F., Principles of Public Administration (New York, 1927), p. 45Google Scholar.
2 July 2, 1935; State Department Press Release, July 20, 1935.
3 State Department Order No. 613, April 25,1935.
4 Executive Order No. 6101, April 5, 1933.
5 Emergency Conservation Work, First Annual Report (U. S. Government Printing Office, December, 1936)Google Scholar.
6 Act of Congress approved March 3, 1915; amended March 2, 1929; 50 USCA 151.
7 House Doc. 118, 74th Cong., 1st Sess.
8 H. R. 5379, and S. 1632.
9 H. R. 7321, and S. 2582.
10 Approved June 29, 1936.
11 Executive Order No. 6472, December 2, 1933.
12 48 Stat. 1083, 47 USCA, sec. 305.
13 The Central Statistical Board, which alone would furnish material for a monograph on coördination, is the outstanding example of effective staffing.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.