Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-8cg97 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-10T00:59:09.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Closeness, Expenditures, and Turnout in the 1982 U.S. House Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Gary W. Cox  and
Michael C. Munger
Gary W. Cox
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Michael C. Munger
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Students of elections have repeatedly found that the closeness of an election is modestly correlated with turnout. This may be due to a direct response of instrumentally motivated voters, but recent theoretical work casts doubt on the adequacy of this explanation. Another possibility is that elite actors respond to closeness with greater effort at mobilization. We explore the latter possibility by using FEC and state data on campaign expenditures in House, Senate, and gubernatorial races. Our results indicate that closeness has an effect at both the mass and elite levels. We also provide quantitative estimates of the effect of Senate and gubernatorial expenditure on House turnout.

Type
Research Notes
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 83 , Issue 1 , March 1989 , pp. 217 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ashenfelter, Orley, and Kelley, Stanley. 1975. “Determinants of Participation in Presidential Elections.” Journal of Law and Economics 18: 695–733.Google Scholar
Barzel, Yoram, and Silberberg, Eugene. 1973. “Is the Act of Voting Rational?” Public Choice 16: 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bochel, J. M., and Denver, D. T.. 1971. “Canvassing, Turnout, and Party Support: An Experiment.” British Journal of Political Science 1: 257–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Patterson, Samuel C.. 1982. “Contextual Influences on Participation in U.S. State Legislative Election.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 7:359–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, William N., and Davis, Philip C.. 1978. “Party, Competition, and Mass Participation: The Case of the Democratizing Party System 1824–1852.” In The History of American Electoral Behavior, ed. Silbey, Joel H., Bogue, Allan G., and Flanigan, William H.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1988. “Closeness and Turnout: A Methodological Note.” Journal of Politics 50: 768–75.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Kousser, J. Morgan. 1981. “Turnout and Rural Corruption: New York As a Test Case.” American Journal of Political Science 25:646–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain, Mark, and Deaton, Thomas H.. 1977. “A Note on Political Participation As Consumption Behavior.” Public Choice 32:131–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain, Mark, Leavens, Donald R., and Abbot, Lynn. 1987. “Voting and Not Voting at the Same Time.” Public Choice 53:221–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, Paul A., and Zinser, James E.. 1976. “Political Finance and Participation in Congressional Election.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 425:59–73.Google Scholar
Denzau, Arthur T., and Munger, Michael C.. 1986. “Legislators and Interest Groups: How Unorganized Interests Get Represented.” American Political Science Review 80:89–106.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Eldersveld, Samuel J. 1956. “Experimental Propaganda Techniques and Voting Behavior.” American Political Science Review 50:154–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. 1974. “The Paradox of Not Voting: A Decision Theoretic Analysis.” American Political Science Review 68:525–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John, and Noll, Roger. 1985. “Promises, Promises: Campaign Contributions and the Reputation for Services.” Working Papers in Political Science no. P-85-1. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution.Google Scholar
Fischhoff, Baruch, and Goitein, Bernard. 1984. “The Informal Use of Formal Models.” Academy of Management Review 9:505–12.Google Scholar
Foster, Carroll B. 1984. “The Performance of Rational Voter Models in Recent Presidential Elections.” American Political Science Review 78:678–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia. 1976. “A Note on Competition and Turnout in the American States.” Journal of Politics 38:153–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanushek, Eric A., and Jackson, John E.. 1977. Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hinich, Melvin J. 1981. “Voting As an Act of Contribution.” Public Choice 36:135–40.Google Scholar
Judge, George G., Griffiths, William E., Hill, R. Carter, Lee, Tsoung-chao. 1980. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1973. “On the Psychology of Prediction.” Psychological Review 80:237–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1979. “Intuitive Prediction: Biases and Corrective Procedures.” In Forecasting, ed. Makridakis, S. and Wheelwright, S. C.. TIMS Studies in Management Science vol. 12. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Kau, James B., and Rubin, Paul H.. 1976. “The Electoral College and the Rational Vote.” Public Choice 27:101–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, Valdimer O. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Kramer, Gerald H. 1970–1971. “The Effects of Precinct-Level Canvassing on Voting Behavior.” Public Opinion Quarterly 34:560–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledyard, John. 1984. “The Pure Theory of Two-Candidate Elections.” Public Choice 44:7–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, Sarah, and Slovic, Paul. 1971. “Reversals of Preference between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 89:46–55.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry. 1980. The Organization of Interests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I., Shapiro, Robert Y., and Dempsey, Glenn R.. 1987. “What Moves Public Opinion?” American Political Science Review 81:23–43.Google Scholar
Palfrey, Thomas R., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1985. “Voter Participation and Strategic Uncertainty.” American Political Science Review 79:62–78.Google Scholar
Patterson, Samuel C., and Caldeira, Gregory A.. 1983. “Getting Out the Vote: Participation in Gubernatorial Elections.” American Political Science Review 77:675–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William, and Ordeshook, Peter. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62:25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven, and Wolfinger, Raymond. 1978. “The Effect of Registration Laws on Voter Turnout.” American Political Science Review 72: 22–45.Google Scholar
Rossi, Peter H., and Cutright, Phillips. 1961. “The Impact of Party Organization in an Industrial Setting.” In Community Political Systems, ed. Janowitz, Morris. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Thomas. 1987. “Your Vote Counts on Account of the Way It Is Counted: An Institutional Solution to the Paradox of Not Voting.” Public Choice 54:101–21.Google Scholar
Settle, Russell F., and Abrams, Burton A.. 1976. “The Determinants of Voter Participation: A More General Model.” Public Choice 27:81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silberman, Jonathan, and Durden, Garey. 1975. “The Rational Theory of Voter Participation.” Public Choice 23:101–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill, Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Glass, David P.. 1987. “Residential Mobility and Voter Turnout.” American Political Science Review 81: 45–65.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.